Intel Core i5-14401E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL Comparison

Intel Core i5-14401E and Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL are two desktop processors from Intel that target different segments of the market. The i5-14401E is a 14th Generation part built on Raptor Lake architecture, while the Ultra 7 155HL belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 lineup based on Meteor Lake. The benchmark database contains a full set of six Cinebench scores for the i5-14401E, but no benchmark entries for the Ultra 7 155HL, so the comparative analysis relies on the architectural specifications and the recorded performance of the i5-14401E against its nearest rivals.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E clearly wins in terms of available performance data. The database records six Cinebench results for this processor, covering both single-core and multi-core tests across three versions of the Cinebench suite. These scores place the i5-14401E at the 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 5253. The processor’s nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 with an average score of 5259, the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241, the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240, and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210. The recorded deltas are narrow, ranging from 0.1 percent behind the Xeon to 0.8 percent ahead of the i5-13400T, indicating that the i5-14401E sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has no benchmark scores in the database, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. Its percentile ranking is 50, which places it below the i5-14401E in the overall distribution, but this ranking is not supported by any direct measurements, so it should be treated as a placeholder rather than a verified result. The Ultra 7 does win on core count and thread count, offering 16 cores and 22 threads compared to the i5-14401E’s 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has a higher boost clock, reaching 4.80 GHz versus 4.70 GHz for the i5-14401E.

For workloads that depend on many parallel threads, the Ultra 7 155HL has a structural advantage on paper. Its 16 cores and 22 threads suggest a design intended for multithreaded throughput, while the i5-14401E, with fewer cores but a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 1.40 GHz, leans toward single-thread responsiveness. The i5-14401E wins on recorded performance data, while the Ultra 7 wins on raw thread count and integrated graphics capability, featuring Arc Xe-LPG 128EU compared to UHD Graphics 730.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is part of the Core i5 generation described as Raptor Lake Refresh. It is built on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Meteor Lake architecture with the Meteor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Ultra 7 generation. Its process node is 7 nm, and no die size is recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 155HL has larger per-core allocations: 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. These differences reflect the architectural shift between generations, with Meteor Lake providing larger cache structures per core.

Memory support also separates the two. The i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The Ultra 7 155HL supports DDR5 only, with the database noting that support depends on the motherboard, also in dual-channel mode. The Ultra 7 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is listed for the i5-14401E.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The i5-14401E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 7 155HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the i5-14401E a clear advantage for high-throughput expansion devices, including modern graphics cards and NVMe storage, though the Ultra 7’s lower lane count may suffice for more modest configurations.

The sockets are incompatible. The i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 155HL uses Intel Socket 1851. Thermal design power also differs, with the i5-14401E rated at 65 watts and the Ultra 7 155HL rated at 45 watts. The Ultra 7’s lower power envelope, combined with its smaller process node, suggests a more energy-efficient design, though the database does not include any power consumption measurements. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports user overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results between the i5-14401E and the Ultra 7 155HL are not present in the database. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means the only quantitative comparison available comes from the i5-14401E’s own Cinebench results and its position relative to its nearest rivals.

The i5-14401E’s recorded scores are as follows: in Cinebench R15, it scores 1830 in multi-core and 258 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7627 in multi-core and 1076 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18161 in multi-core and 2564 in single-core. These numbers show a consistent pattern: the multi-core scores scale with the test version, and the single-core scores also improve across the suite. The R23 multi-core score of 18161 is roughly ten times the R15 multi-core score of 1830, which is typical for the increasing workload demands of newer Cinebench versions.

Comparing the i5-14401E to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 has an average score of 5259, which is 0.1 percent higher than the i5-14401E’s 5253. The Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5241, 0.2 percent lower. The Intel Core i9-10850K also scores 5240, 0.2 percent lower, and the Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5210, 0.8 percent lower. These deltas are small, meaning the i5-14401E performs nearly identically to a Xeon from a different era and slightly better than several mainstream desktop chips.

For the Ultra 7 155HL, no scores exist to compare, so any statement about its performance relative to the i5-14401E must rely on architecture. The Ultra 7’s 16 cores and 22 threads would likely handle heavily threaded workloads differently than the i5-14401E’s 6 cores and 12 threads, but the database provides no measurements to confirm this. The i5-14401E’s higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 1.40 GHz suggests better single-thread performance in lightly threaded tasks, but again, no direct benchmark confirms this.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the processor with verifiable performance metrics. Its six Cinebench scores and its 60th percentile ranking provide concrete evidence of its capabilities, and its average benchmark score of 5253 places it among a cluster of capable desktop and workstation chips. The Ultra 7 155HL, with no benchmark entries and an average score of zero, cannot be evaluated on the same basis.

For users who prioritize recorded performance and a proven track record, the i5-14401E is the clear choice from the database’s perspective. It offers a higher base clock, PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes, ECC memory compatibility, and a wider range of memory types including DDR4 and DDR5. Its 65 watt TDP is higher than the Ultra 7’s 45 watts, but the data does not suggest any efficiency trade-off that would favor the Ultra 7.

For users who prioritize thread count and integrated graphics, the Ultra 7 155HL has structural advantages. Its 16 cores and 22 threads double the core count and nearly double the thread count of the i5-14401E. Its Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated graphics are more capable on paper than the UHD Graphics 730. Its larger L3 cache of 24 MB and higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz also point toward a design that emphasizes multithreaded throughput and graphics performance. However, without benchmark scores, these advantages remain unverified.

The database’s percentile rankings place the i5-14401E at the 60th percentile and the Ultra 7 155HL at the 50th percentile, but the Ultra 7’s ranking lacks supporting measurements. The i5-14401E’s nearest rivals all fall within a 0.8 percent range of its average score, confirming that it performs as expected for its class. The Ultra 7’s lack of data means it cannot be positioned relative to any rivals, leaving its performance an open question.

The choice depends on whether the user trusts architectural specifications over measured results. The i5-14401E delivers what the database can confirm: strong Cinebench scores, a solid percentile rank, and a competitive position among its peers. The Ultra 7 155HL offers a newer architecture, more cores, and a lower TDP, but the database contains no evidence of its actual performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock, the Intel Core i5-14401E or the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14401E?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, placing it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL, and its average benchmark score is zero.

Q: Which socket does each processor use?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What type of integrated graphics does each processor feature?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E features UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL features Arc Xe-LPG 128EU.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i5-14401E and Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL differ in several key specifications. The i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node and a die size of 215 mm², while the Ultra 7 155HL uses Meteor Lake architecture with a 7 nm process node and no recorded die size.

Core and thread counts differ: the i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 155HL has 16 cores and 22 threads. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the i5-14401E and 1.40 GHz for the Ultra 7 155HL, with boost clocks of 4.70 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively. TDP ratings are 65 watts for the i5-14401E and 45 watts for the Ultra 7 155HL.

Cache configurations differ in size: the i5-14401E has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The Ultra 7 155HL has 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support also differs, with the i5-14401E supporting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 155HL supports DDR5 only, and the Ultra 7 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe connectivity differs: the i5-14401E offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 7 155HL offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14401E but absent on the Ultra 7 155HL. The sockets are different, with the i5-14401E using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 7 155HL using Intel Socket 1851. The integrated graphics are also different, with UHD Graphics 730 on the i5-14401E and Arc Xe-LPG 128EU on the Ultra 7 155HL. Both processors have locked multipliers, and both are active in production status. The Ultra 7 155HL has a launch MSRP of $438, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14401E.