Intel Core i5-14401E vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison
Intel Core i5-14401E
Core i5-14401TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14401E vs Intel Core i5-14401TE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded database does not contain a direct head-to-head benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i5-14401E and the Intel Core i5-14401TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has a wins count assigned in a direct matchup. This means there are no side-by-side scores for the pair in the Cinebench R15, R20, or R23 test suites.
However, the Core i5-14401E has a complete set of benchmark scores, while the Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark results at all. The 14401E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and a single-core score of 2564. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 1830 multi-core and 258 single-core.
The Core i5-14401TE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of zero and no percentile ranking data beyond the 50th percentile. The absence of scores for the TE variant means any performance delta between the two parts cannot be quantified from the database. The E variant sits at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, while the TE variant sits at the 50th percentile, but that percentile gap is not accompanied by any actual test scores for the TE.
When comparing the E variant to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, which has an average score of 5259 versus the 14401E's 5253, a delta of -0.1%. The Core i7-11700B averages 5241, which is 0.2% behind the 14401E. The Core i9-10850K also sits 0.2% behind at 5240. The closest rival is the Core i5-13400T at 5210, which trails by 0.8%. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating the 14401E performs in a very tight band around its nearest competitors.
For the TE variant, there are no nearest rivals listed in the database, so no comparative analysis can be made against other processors. The only meaningful statement is that the TE carries a 50th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the E carries a 60th percentile rank. That percentile difference suggests the E holds a higher overall standing, but with no TE scores recorded, the magnitude of that advantage remains unspecified.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14401E?
A: The database records an average benchmark score of 5253 for the Core i5-14401E. This places it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs.
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. The TE variant has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. Its only ranking data is a 50th percentile position among all CPUs.
Q: How does the Core i5-14401E compare to its closest rival, the Core i5-13400T?
A: The Core i5-13400T has an average score of 5210, which is 0.8% lower than the 14401E's 5253. The 14401E holds a slight edge in average benchmark performance.
Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the Core i5-14401E?
A: The Core i5-14401E records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and a single-core score of 2564.
Q: Are the two processors from the same generation and architecture?
A: Yes. Both are Core 14th Gen parts based on Raptor Lake architecture, with the Raptor Lake-R codename. Both use the same 10 nm process node and a 215 mm² die size.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The base clocks differ as well: 2.50 GHz for the E and 2.00 GHz for the TE.
The Verdict
The data points clearly in one direction for raw performance: the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. The 14401E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and a single-core score of 2564. Its average benchmark score of 5253 puts it within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, all of which are within a single percentage point.
The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores in the database. Its average score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals to compare against. The only quantitative distinction is the 50th percentile rank, which is ten percentile points below the E variant. For any workload that relies on multi-threaded or single-threaded performance as measured by Cinebench, the E variant is the only part with verified results.
The TE variant does carry a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 65 watts for the E variant. That thermal difference may matter for systems with tighter cooling or power budgets, but the database provides no performance figures for the TE to weigh against that power advantage. Without scores, any performance claim for the TE is unsupported. The E variant is the defensible choice based on the recorded data.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several specifications, all of which are recorded in the database.
Clock speeds: The Core i5-14401E has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Core i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The E variant is 0.50 GHz higher at base and 0.20 GHz higher at boost.
Thermal design power: The E variant has a TDP of 65 watts. The TE variant has a TDP of 45 watts, a 20-watt difference.
Part number: The E variant carries part number Q49JSRNJS. The TE variant carries part number Q4T4SRNJP.
All other specifications are identical. Both have 6 cores and 12 threads. Both use Intel Socket 1700. Both have the same cache layout: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. Both support ECC memory. Both feature PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both use UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics. Both are desktop parts with active production status. Both were released on the same date. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the same underlying architecture. They are both Raptor Lake parts with the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core i5 generation under the Raptor Lake Refresh family. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a 215 mm² die size. The foundry is Intel for both.
The core configuration is identical: 6 cores and 12 threads. The cache hierarchy matches exactly. L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and L3 is 20 MB shared. There is no 3D V-Cache on either part.
Memory support is the same. Both accept DDR4 and DDR5, both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both have ECC memory capability. The PCIe implementation is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are the same UHD Graphics 730.
The only architectural difference between the two parts is the clock speed configuration, which stems from the different TDP targets. The E variant runs at higher clocks with a 65-watt TDP, while the TE variant runs at lower clocks with a 45-watt TDP. The silicon itself, as described by architecture, codename, process node, die size, and cache structure, is the same. The TE designation typically indicates a lower-power variant in Intel's naming scheme, and the clock and TDP data confirm that pattern. The benchmarks, however, only exist for the E variant, so any architectural performance advantage from the higher clocks cannot be directly measured against the TE in the database.