Intel Core i5-14400T vs Intel Core i7-1370P Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests overall?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T wins 10 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core i7-1370P wins 7. However, the average benchmark scores are very close: the i5-14400T averages 27166, and the i7-1370P averages 26900, a difference of only about 1%.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench multicore tests?

A: The i5-14400T leads consistently across all three Cinebench multicore versions. In R15 multicore, it scores 1732 versus 1649 (5% ahead); in R20 multicore, 7219 versus 6873 (5% ahead); and in R23 multicore, 17189 versus 16365 (5% ahead).

Q: Are there any workloads where the i7-1370P clearly beats the i5-14400T?

A: Yes, particularly in PassMark integer math and floating-point math. The i7-1370P scores 78675 in integer math (16.5% ahead) and 54105 in floating-point math (9.2% ahead). It also wins PassMark physics by 15.1% (1466 vs 1244) and find prime numbers by 24.7% (97 vs 73).

Q: Which chip has higher single-threaded performance?

A: The i7-1370P edges out the i5-14400T in PassMark single-thread tests, scoring 3557 versus 3512 (1.3% ahead). However, the i5-14400T wins all Cinebench single-core tests, with the largest margin in R15 single-core (244 vs 232, 5.2% ahead).

Q: What are the physical specifications that differ between them?

A: The i5-14400T uses Intel Socket 1700 (desktop), while the i7-1370P uses Intel BGA 1744 (mobile). The i5-14400T has a 35W TDP, the i7-1370P has a 28W TDP. The i5-14400T supports ECC memory; the i7-1370P does not.

Q: How do their cache sizes differ?

A: The i5-14400T has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-1370P has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The i5-14400T carries the Raptor Lake-R codename, targeting the desktop market with a 215 mm² die, while the i7-1370P uses the Raptor Lake-P codename for mobile platforms with a slightly larger 217 mm² die.

The core configurations diverge sharply. The i5-14400T packs 10 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-1370P has 14 cores and 20 threads. This gives the mobile chip four additional cores and four additional threads, a structural advantage in heavily parallel workloads. Yet the desktop part's higher TDP (35W vs 28W) allows it to maintain competitive performance despite fewer cores.

Cache hierarchy also differs. The i5-14400T provides 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The i7-1370P doubles the per-core L2 to 2 MB and raises shared L3 to 24 MB. The extra cache on the i7-1370P likely contributes to its wins in math-heavy PassMark tests, where data reuse patterns benefit from larger caches.

Integrated graphics differ meaningfully. The i5-14400T ships with UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-1370P features Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. For a desktop chip, the i5-14400T's graphics are basic; the i7-1370P's Iris Xe is a more capable integrated solution for mobile systems.

PCIe support also separates them. The i5-14400T offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-1370P uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The desktop chip's newer PCIe generation provides higher bandwidth for compatible devices, though the mobile chip has more lanes overall.

Memory support is identical on paper: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. However, ECC memory is supported only on the i5-14400T, which aligns with its desktop positioning for workstation-adjacent tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14400T dominates the Cinebench suite, winning all six tests (R15, R20, R23, both single and multicore). Its margins range from 4.9% to 5.2%, showing a consistent performance advantage in rendering and 3D workloads. It also wins PassMark data compression (235636 vs 217676, 8.3% ahead) and extended instructions (14562 vs 12822, 13.6% ahead). Random string sorting also favors the i5-14400T by 6.8%.

The i7-1370P counters in mathematical and physics-based PassMark tests. Its largest win is find prime numbers, where it scores 97 versus 73, a 24.7% gap. It also wins floating-point math (54105 vs 49139, 9.2% ahead) and integer math (78675 vs 65667, 16.5% ahead). Physics simulation favors the i7-1370P by 15.1%, and it narrowly takes PassMark multithread (20303 vs 20223, 0.4% ahead) and single-thread (3557 vs 3512, 1.3% ahead).

The split is clear: the i5-14400T handles rendering, compression, and general instruction execution better, while the i7-1370P excels in raw arithmetic, prime-number computation, and physics simulations. The i7-1370P's extra cores and larger cache appear to aid math-heavy algorithms, while the i5-14400T's higher clock headroom (boost 4.50 GHz vs 5.20 GHz for the i7-1370P, though base clocks differ) may benefit sustained rendering loads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14400T | Intel Core i7-1370P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 1900.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 35W | 28W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Raptor Lake-P |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 217 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $438 |

| Part Number | SRN3N | SRMJ6 |

Both chips share the same L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), and are not multiplier-unlocked.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results paint a consistent picture. In R15 multicore, the i5-14400T scores 1732 against the i7-1370P's 1649, a 5% advantage. R15 single-core shows the i5-14400T at 244 versus 232, a 5.2% lead. Moving to R20, the i5-14400T maintains its edge: 7219 vs 6873 in multicore (5%) and 1018 vs 970 in single-core (4.9%). In R23, the i5-14400T posts 17189 vs 16365 multicore (5%) and 2426 vs 2310 single-core (5%). Across all six Cinebench tests, the i5-14400T never falls behind.

PassMark results are more varied. The i5-14400T wins data compression decisively: 235636 vs 217676, an 8.3% margin. Data encryption goes narrowly to the i5-14400T at 13244 vs 13067 (1.4%). Extended instructions favor the i5-14400T by a substantial 13.6% (14562 vs 12822). Random string sorting goes to the i5-14400T with 25181 vs 23580 (6.8%).

The i7-1370P takes the remaining tests. Find prime numbers is its strongest showing: 97 vs 73, a 24.7% victory. Integer math sees the i7-1370P at 78675 vs 65667 (16.5% ahead). Floating-point math goes to the i7-1370P at 54105 vs 49139 (9.2%). Physics also favors the i7-1370P at 1466 vs 1244 (15.1%). PassMark multithread is nearly a tie, with the i7-1370P at 20303 vs 20223 (0.4% ahead). Single-thread PassMark gives the i7-1370P a slim 1.3% win (3557 vs 3512).

The overall benchmark score averages are close: the i5-14400T averages 27166, and the i7-1370P averages 26900. Both sit at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The i5-14400T's nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-9900K (avg score 27097, 0.3% delta), while the i7-1370P's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (avg score 26936, -0.1% delta).

The Verdict

For desktop users prioritizing rendering and compression workloads, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the clear choice. It wins every Cinebench test by roughly 5%, demonstrating a reliable advantage in multi-threaded rendering tasks. Its wins in data compression (8.3%) and extended instructions (13.6%) further solidify its position for content creation and general productivity.

For mobile users or those focused on mathematical and physics-based computations, the Intel Core i7-1370P offers specific strengths. Its 24.7% lead in find prime numbers, 16.5% lead in integer math, and 15.1% lead in physics indicate superior performance in scientific and simulation workloads. The i7-1370P also has a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz vs 4.50 GHz) and more cores (14 vs 10), which helps in arithmetic-heavy tasks.

The i5-14400T's lower launch MSRP ($221 vs $438) makes it a more accessible desktop option, though pricing should not be the primary consideration given the performance profiles. The i5-14400T's ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 make it suitable for desktop workstations, while the i7-1370P's BGA 1744 socket and mobile segment target laptops and compact systems.

In aggregate, the i5-14400T wins more benchmarks (10 vs 7) and has a slightly higher average score (27166 vs 26900). The i7-1370P's advantages are concentrated in specific math-centric tests, whereas the i5-14400T's wins span rendering, compression, and instruction execution. For most users, the i5-14400T offers broader performance coverage. The i7-1370P is the pick only when arithmetic throughput or physics simulation is the dominant workload. Both chips deliver comparable overall performance, with the i5-14400T providing a more balanced profile for desktop use.