Intel Core i5-14400T vs Intel Core i7-13700H Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700H and Intel Core i5-14400T represent two distinct interpretations of Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, one aimed at mobile performance and the other at desktop efficiency. The benchmark data presents a fascinating split: the i7-13700H dominates in legacy and synthetic workloads, while the i5-14400T counters with surprising wins in the latest Cinebench releases. With a nearly identical average benchmark score—27,355 for the i7 against 27,166 for the i5—the overall performance delta is a razor-thin 0.7% in favor of the mobile chip. This close contest raises a central question: does the higher core count of the i7 or the architectural refresh of the i5 define the better choice for specific tasks? The data suggests the answer depends heavily on which benchmark you trust.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has an average benchmark score of 27,355, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-14400T’s 27,166. This places the i7-13700H ahead in the nearestRivals comparison, as the deltaPct for the i5-14400T is listed as -0.7%.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: This is a key differentiator. The Intel Core i5-14400T wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test with a score of 17,189, while the Intel Core i7-13700H scores 15,474. The deltaPct shows the i5 is 10% ahead of the i7 in this specific benchmark.

Q: Which CPU offers better performance in PassMark integer math?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H is the clear winner in this workload. It scores 92,811 in PassMark integer math, compared to the i5-14400T’s 65,667. This represents a 41.3% advantage for the i7-13700H.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H features 14 cores and 20 threads. In contrast, the Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. This core advantage is a primary driver for the i7’s wins in many multi-threaded tests.

Q: Do these CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes for the i5, no for the i7. The Intel Core i5-14400T has ECC memory support enabled, while the Intel Core i7-13700H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in their integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H is equipped with Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units (96EU). The Intel Core i5-14400T uses a more basic UHD Graphics 730 solution.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel’s 10 nm process node and share the Raptor Lake architecture, but they are distinct implementations. The Core i7-13700H is a Raptor Lake-H part designed for mobile platforms, while the Core i5-14400T is a Raptor Lake-R (Refresh) desktop chip. This fundamental difference is reflected in their physical sockets: the i7 uses Intel BGA 1744, and the i5 uses Intel Socket 1700. The i7-13700H is a mobile chip with a 45W TDP, whereas the i5-14400T is a desktop part with a lower 35W TDP.

The core configuration is a major architectural divergence. The i7-13700H packs 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i5-14400T offers 10 cores and 16 threads. This gives the mobile part a significant thread-count advantage. Cache hierarchies also differ: the i7 has a larger L2 cache at 2 MB per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5 offers 1.25 MB per core of L2 and 20 MB of L3. The i5-14400T is the only one with a listed die size, coming in at 215 mm².

Feature support shows a split. The i5-14400T supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i7-13700H. PCIe connectivity also differs, with the i5 supporting Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), doubling the lane count of the i7’s Gen 5, 8 lanes (CPU only). Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The integrated graphics are a point of separation, with the i7 featuring the more potent Iris Xe Graphics 96EU compared to the i5’s UHD Graphics 730.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are a study in contrasts. The Intel Core i7-13700H wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, but the Intel Core i5-14400T secures two significant victories that cannot be ignored. The i7-13700H’s dominance is most pronounced in the PassMark suite. It leads by 41.3% in integer math (92,811 vs. 65,667), by 41.1% in finding prime numbers (103 vs. 73), and by 38.7% in physics tests (1,725 vs. 1,244). Data encryption shows a 35.7% advantage for the i7 (17,971 vs. 13,244), and floating-point math is 35% higher (66,322 vs. 49,139). In data compression, the i7 leads by 30.6% (307,791 vs. 235,636), and in multithreaded performance, it is 30.5% ahead (26,399 vs. 20,223). The mobile chip also wins random string sorting by 33.4% (33,595 vs. 25,181) and extended instructions by 25.7% (18,303 vs. 14,562).

The Cinebench results tell a more nuanced story. The i7-13700H wins decisively in Cinebench R15 and R20, with a 44.1% lead in R15 multi-core (2,496 vs. 1,732) and a 27.9% lead in R20 multi-core (9,231 vs. 7,219). Single-core scores in these older tests also favor the i7, with a 10.2% advantage in R15 (269 vs. 244) and a 28% lead in R20 (1,303 vs. 1,018). However, the i5-14400T flips the script in Cinebench R23. It scores 17,189 in the multi-core test, a 10% victory over the i7’s 15,474. The single-core R23 result is even more lopsided, with the i5 winning by 23.5% (2,426 vs. 1,856). The only other i5 win is a narrow one in PassMark single-thread tests, where it trails by just 2.3% (3,512 vs. 3,594), still a loss.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear, though counterintuitive, picture. For users prioritizing the latest rendering workloads, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the superior choice based on its commanding 10% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 23.5% lead in R23 single-core. This suggests that the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture brings tangible efficiency improvements in modern, thread-savvy applications. However, for nearly every other measurable metric, the Intel Core i7-13700H is the performance king. Its 14-core, 20-thread configuration delivers massive leads in the PassMark suite, often exceeding 30% and reaching 41.3% in integer math. The i7 is the pick for general productivity, data compression, encryption, and older benchmark suites. The i5-14400T, despite its lower core count and TDP, is not a slouch—its R23 performance proves it can handle modern multi-core loads effectively. Ultimately, the choice hinges on the specific software environment. If the workload is dominated by Cinebench R23 or similar latest-generation rendering tasks, the i5-14400T is the data-backed winner. For everything else, the i7-13700H’s raw core advantage makes it the safer, more versatile choice.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several key specification points. The Intel Core i7-13700H has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, whereas the Intel Core i5-14400T starts lower at 1.50 GHz and boosts to 4.50 GHz. The i7 has a TDP of 45W, while the i5 is rated for 35W. The core and thread counts differ significantly (14 cores/20 threads vs. 10 cores/16 threads). Cache configurations are different, with the i7 offering 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of L3, compared to the i5’s 1.25 MB per core and 20 MB of L3. The i5-14400T has a listed die size of 215 mm², which the i7 lacks. The socket types are unique to each (BGA 1744 vs. Socket 1700). The i5 supports ECC memory (true), while the i7 does not (false). PCIe lane allocation favors the i5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) versus the i7’s 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with the i7 featuring Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and the i5 using UHD Graphics 730. The market segments are distinct (Mobile vs. Desktop), and their release dates are separated by roughly a year (2023-01-03 vs. 2024-01-07). The launch MSRP for the i7-13700H is $502, and for the i5-14400T it is $221.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700H is the definitive winner in the majority of benchmark categories. It excels in data-heavy workloads, as evidenced by its 30.6% lead in data compression and 35.7% lead in data encryption. Mathematical and physics computations are also its strong suit, with a 41.3% win in integer math, a 35% win in floating-point math, and a 38.7% win in physics. For multi-threaded general performance, it holds a 30.5% advantage in the PassMark multithread test. It also shows superior performance in older Cinebench versions, leading by 44.1% in R15 multi-core and 27.9% in R20 multi-core. In single-core tests from the PassMark suite, it edges out the i5 by 2.3%, and it wins the Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core tests by 10.2% and 28%, respectively. Its wins in extended instructions (25.7%), random string sorting (33.4%), and find prime numbers (41.1%) solidify its position as the performance leader for a wide range of compute tasks.

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in a narrower but critical set of scenarios. Its most significant victories come in Cinebench R23, where it outperforms the i7-13700H by 10% in multi-core and by a substantial 23.5% in single-core. This indicates that in the most recent iteration of Cinebench, the i5-14400T’s architecture is more efficient, likely due to its Raptor Lake Refresh design. This makes it the better choice for users whose primary benchmark is Cinebench R23 or for applications with similar performance scaling. It has no other benchmark wins in the head-to-head data, but its strong R23 performance suggests a specialization in modern, heavily optimized rendering and encoding tasks. For those specific workloads, the i5-14400T is the clear data-driven pick, despite its lower core count and TDP.