Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data delivers a decisive verdict: the Intel Core i5-14400F wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE secures only 2. The margin is not narrow. Across the Cinebench suite, the i5-14400F leads by a consistent 27% in both single-core and multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5 scores 21645 against 17035 for the i7, a delta of 27.1%. The single-core R23 result mirrors this: 3055 versus 2405, a 27% advantage. This pattern repeats in R15 and R20, where the i5-14400F posts 2181 and 9090 multi-core scores, respectively, versus 1716 and 7154 for the i7. The single-core R15 and R20 results show the same 27% gap.

The Passmark suite reveals where the i5-14400F extends its lead even further. In data encryption, the i5 scores 16949 against 11699, a 44.9% delta, its largest win. Data compression shows a 43.1% advantage (315521 versus 220520), and random string sorting follows at 43.6% (32680 versus 22760). Single-thread performance in Passmark favors the i5 by 40.3%: 3701 versus 2637. Extended instructions also lean heavily toward the i5, with 19937 against 14354, a 38.9% gap. Integer math and floating-point math are closer but still clear wins for the i5: 23.9% (81524 versus 65792) and 22.1% (61319 versus 50219), respectively. The multi-thread Passmark score confirms the Cinebench trend, showing a 27.1% lead for the i5 (25470 versus 20042).

The i7-14701TE wins only two tests, and both are specific physics or prime-number workloads. In Passmark find prime numbers, the i7 scores 143 against 86 for the i5, a 39.9% margin. In Passmark physics, the i7 posts 1860 versus 1523, an 18.1% advantage. These isolated wins do little to offset the broader pattern. The overall average benchmark score for the i5-14400F is 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The i7-14701TE averages 26013, sitting in the 78th percentile. The i5’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (delta 0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-11900 (delta 0.2%), while the i7’s closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (delta 0.1%).

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same foundation: Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry. They use the same Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. Both also enable ECC memory and provide Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU. The core configurations, however, diverge. The i5-14400F packs 10 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-14701TE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The i5 achieves its higher thread count through a mix of performance and efficiency cores; the i7 relies on fewer physical cores but compensates with a higher boost clock.

Clock speeds tell a distinct story. The i5-14400F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The i7-14701TE starts lower at 2.10 GHz base but boosts higher, reaching 5.20 GHz. This explains the i7’s wins in physics and prime-number tests, which often respond to raw single-thread frequency. The i5, despite a lower boost ceiling, wins single-thread benchmarks by a wide margin, indicating that its core count and cache configuration matter more than peak frequency in the recorded tests.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The i5-14400F carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 20 MB of shared L3. The i7-14701TE also has 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and increases shared L3 to 33 MB. The larger cache on the i7 should theoretically help in data-heavy workloads, yet the benchmark results show the i5 winning data compression and encryption by over 40%. Die size also differs: the i5 measures 215 mm², while the i7 is larger at 257 mm². The i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listing N/A, whereas the i7-14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The i5’s launch MSRP is $196; the i7 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14400F dominates nearly every measured workload. It wins all three Cinebench versions in both single-core and multi-core tests, indicating a broad advantage in rendering and CPU-intensive compute. The Passmark results reinforce this: the i5 leads in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. For general productivity, content creation, and software compilation, the data points squarely to the i5. Its 15 wins out of 17 head-to-head tests make it the default choice for anyone prioritizing overall throughput.

The i7-14701TE wins only in two specific Passmark subtests: find prime numbers and physics. These are narrow, specialized workloads. The prime-number test often relies on efficient integer loops and branch prediction, where the i7’s higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz likely provides an edge. The physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics, also benefits from high single-thread frequency and possibly the larger 33 MB L3 cache. Outside these two cases, the i7 lags. Its multi-core scores are consistently 27% behind, and its single-thread scores trail by 27% in Cinebench and 40% in Passmark. The i7’s lower TDP of 45 watts versus the i5’s 65 watts suggests an efficiency-focused design, but the benchmark data does not show a corresponding performance benefit.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes the choice straightforward for most users. The Intel Core i5-14400F is the superior processor in 15 of 17 tests, with an average benchmark score of 32279 versus 26013 for the i7-14701TE. That is a 24% gap in favor of the i5, and it holds across every Cinebench iteration and the majority of Passmark subtests. The i5’s 10 cores and 16 threads outpace the i7’s 8 cores and 16 threads in multi-threaded workloads, and its single-thread scores, despite a lower boost clock, defeat the i7 by 27% to 40%. For anyone running rendering, compression, encryption, or general compute tasks, the i5-14400F is the clear winner.

The i7-14701TE is only preferable in niche scenarios. If the workload consists primarily of prime-number finding or physics simulations, the i7’s wins in those two tests, with margins of 39.9% and 18.1%, make it a targeted choice. Its lower 45 watt TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 also set it apart, but the benchmarks do not quantify any power or graphics advantage. The i7 also carries a larger L3 cache (33 MB versus 20 MB) and more L2 per core, yet the recorded tests show no benefit outside the two physics-oriented wins. The i5-14400F, with a launch MSRP of $196 and a higher average score, delivers broader performance. The i7-14701TE has no launch MSRP in the database, and its 78th percentile ranking trails the i5’s 83rd.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F wins all multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21645 versus 17035, a 27.1% advantage. Passmark multithread shows the same margin: 25470 versus 20042.

Q: Does the i7-14701TE beat the i5-14400F in any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins two tests: Passmark find prime numbers (143 versus 86, a 39.9% margin) and Passmark physics (1860 versus 1523, an 18.1% margin).

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do their clock speeds differ?

A: The i5-14400F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The i7-14701TE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The i7-14701TE has more L2 and L3 cache. It provides 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3, while the i5-14400F has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory and PCIe?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and both provide Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both also support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The i5-14400F averages 32279, placing in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The i7-14701TE averages 26013, placing in the 78th percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14400F | Intel Core i7-14701TE |

|----------------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Launch MSRP | $196 | None recorded |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | SRN3RSRN47 | Q49GSRNJL |