Intel Core i5-14400 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-14400

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14701E

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,148
2,237
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
303
315
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
8,952
9,321
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,263
1,315
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
21,315
22,195
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,009
3,133
geekbench_multicore
9,807
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,905
N/A
passmark_data_compression
314,995
282,939
passmark_data_encryption
16,731
14,862
passmark_extended_instructions
19,816
18,528
passmark_find_prime_numbers
80
176
passmark_floating_point_math
61,549
61,873
passmark_integer_math
82,017
81,325
passmark_multithread
25,080
26,112
passmark_physics
1,396
2,399
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,346
29,158
passmark_single_thread
3,741
4,305
passmark_singlethread
3,741
4,305

Analysis: Intel Core i5-14400 vs Intel Core i7-14701E

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear split between these two Intel 14th Gen desktop processors. The Intel Core i7-14701E wins 12 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the Intel Core i5-14400 takes 5 wins. The i7-14701E delivers consistent multi-core and single-core advantages in rendering and compute workloads, but the i5-14400 counters in several specialized data-processing tests.

The i7-14701E leads across the entire Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 2237 against 2148 for the i5-14400, a 4% margin. The R20 multi-core test shows 9321 versus 8952, again 4% ahead. Cinebench R23 multi-core records 22195 for the i7-14701E versus 21315 for the i5-14400, a 4% gap. Single-core results follow the same pattern: R15 single-core is 315 versus 303 (3.8% ahead), R20 single-core is 1315 versus 1263 (4% ahead), and R23 single-core is 3133 versus 3009 (4% ahead). The consistent 4% delta across all three Cinebench versions indicates a uniform clock-speed advantage rather than workload-specific behavior.

PassMark multi-thread testing shows the i7-14701E at 26112 versus 25080, a 4% lead. The physics subtest is a major differentiator: the i7-14701E scores 2399, which is 41.8% higher than the i5-14400's 1396. Prime number finding follows with a 176 versus 80 result, a 54.5% advantage for the i7-14701E. Floating-point math is nearly even, with 61873 versus 61549, a 0.5% edge for the i7-14701E. Single-thread performance is strongly in favor of the i7-14701E: 4305 versus 3741, a 13.1% lead.

The i5-14400 takes its wins in data-oriented workloads. Data compression shows 314995 versus 282939, an 11.3% advantage. Data encryption records 16731 versus 14862, a 12.6% lead. Extended instructions score 19816 versus 18528, 7% higher. Random string sorting is 32346 versus 29158, a 10.9% edge. Integer math is the narrowest i5-14400 win: 82017 versus 81325, just 0.9% ahead.

These results indicate the i7-14701E is the stronger general-purpose processor, particularly for physics simulation, prime-number computation, and any workload that scales with clock speed. The i5-14400's wins in compression, encryption, and sorting suggest its memory subsystem or core scheduling favors those specific instruction patterns.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Raptor Lake architecture on the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Both are desktop parts on Intel Socket 1700 with dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, ECC memory capability, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The core configuration differs significantly. The i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i7-14701E achieves its thread count with fewer physical cores, which means it relies more heavily on simultaneous multithreading. Despite having fewer cores, the i7-14701E has a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz versus 2.50 GHz, and a substantially higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.70 GHz.

Cache allocations favor the i7-14701E. Both share 80 KB of L1 per core, but L2 is 2 MB per core on the i7-14701E versus 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14400. L3 cache is 33 MB shared versus 20 MB shared. The die size also differs, with the i7-14701E measuring 257 mm² against 215 mm² for the i5-14400.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The i5-14400 includes UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770. The i7-14701E released later, on 2024-06-30, versus 2024-01-07 for the i5-14400. The i5-14400 carries a launch MSRP of $221; the i7-14701E has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Why does the i7-14701E win most benchmarks despite having fewer cores?

A: The i7-14701E has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.70 GHz, a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz versus 2.50 GHz, and more cache, including 33 MB L3 versus 20 MB L3. These advantages offset its two-core deficit in most measured workloads.

Q: In which tests does the i5-14400 outperform the i7-14701E?

A: The i5-14400 wins data compression by 11.3%, data encryption by 12.6%, extended instructions by 7%, random string sorting by 10.9%, and integer math by 0.9%.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The i7-14701E scores 4305 in PassMark single-thread testing versus 3741 for the i5-14400, a 13.1% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 3133 versus 3009, a 4% lead.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The i7-14701E has 33 MB shared L3 cache, while the i5-14400 has 20 MB shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14400 | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |

Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, memory support, memory bus, PCIe configuration, ECC support, and locked multiplier status. The part numbers differ: SRN3QSRN46 for the i5-14400, Q49FSRNJK for the i7-14701E.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14701E is the clear choice for compute-heavy and latency-sensitive workloads. Its 13.1% single-thread advantage in PassMark and 4% lead across all Cinebench versions make it stronger for rendering, physics simulation, and any application where peak clock speed dominates. The 41.8% physics win and 54.5% prime-number win are decisive for scientific computing and simulation tasks. The 4% multi-thread lead in Cinebench and PassMark multi-thread confirms it handles parallel rendering workloads better despite fewer physical cores.

The i5-14400 wins where data throughput and instruction-level parallelism matter more than raw clock speed. Its 11.3% data compression lead and 12.6% data encryption lead indicate an advantage in archive management, database operations, and cryptographic workloads. The 10.9% random string sorting win points to better performance in text processing and data organization tasks. The 7% extended instructions lead suggests stronger SIMD or specialized instruction execution in certain code paths.

For mixed workloads, the overall average benchmark score favors the i7-14701E at 33206 versus 32115, and it sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs compared to the 82nd percentile for the i5-14400. The i7-14701E also compares favorably to its nearest rivals, matching AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H within 0%, while the i5-14400's closest competitor is Intel Core i7-12800H with a 0% delta. The i7-14701E's nearest rivals are all mobile or HX-series parts, while the i5-14400 competes with older desktop and mobile processors, reflecting their respective performance tiers.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-14400
i7-14701E
Core Specs
Cores
10
8 -20.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.5
2.6 +4.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.7
5.4 +14.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2.5
2.6 +4.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.7
5.4 +14.9%
Multiplier
25
26 +4.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
20 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
65 W
65 W
PL2
154 W
219 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
—
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$221
—
Part Number
SRN3QSRN46
Q49FSRNJK
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Laminar RM1
—
View Core i5-14400 Details View Core i7-14701E Details