Intel Core i5-13500TE vs Intel Core i7-11700B Comparison

The Intel Core i7-11700B and Intel Core i5-13500TE represent two very different interpretations of what an Intel processor should be, separated by nearly two years of development. The i7-11700B is a mobile Tiger Lake-H part, designed for laptops and compact systems, while the i5-13500TE is a low-power desktop Raptor Lake chip aimed at efficiency-conscious builds. The benchmark data in the database shows a clear, if narrow, performance hierarchy between them, with the older i7 winning every Cinebench test recorded. However, the specifications tell a more complex story about platform capabilities, memory support, and intended use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500TE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11700B has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i5-13500TE also has a lower TDP of 35 watts compared to 65 watts for the i7-11700B.

Q: How do their single-core scores compare?

A: The i7-11700B leads in every single-core Cinebench test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i7-11700B scores 2558 versus 2441 for the i5-13500TE, a 4.8% advantage. The gap is similar in R20 (1074 vs 1025) and R15 (257 vs 246).

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The i7-11700B supports DDR4 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The i5-13500TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, though the database does not list its bandwidth figure.

Q: Does the i5-13500TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13500TE has ECC memory support enabled. The i7-11700B does not support ECC memory.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The i7-11700B uses Intel BGA 1787, which is a soldered mobile socket. The i5-13500TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a standard desktop LGA socket.

Q: What is the production status of each chip?

A: The i7-11700B is marked as end-of-life, while the i5-13500TE is listed as active production. The i5-13500TE has a launch MSRP of $235.

The Verdict

The data in the database is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-11700B outperforms the Intel Core i5-13500TE in every single benchmark recorded. All six head-to-head Cinebench tests, covering both multicore and single-core workloads across R15, R20, and R23, are won by the i7-11700B. The margins are consistent, ranging from 4.5% to 4.8% in favor of the older chip. If raw performance is the sole criterion, the i7-11700B is the better processor.

However, the i5-13500TE offers qualities that do not appear in benchmark scores. It has a much lower TDP of 35 watts, making it significantly more power-efficient on paper. It supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i7-11700B, and it can use both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders more flexibility in system design. The i5-13500TE also sits on a desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, which allows for user-replaceable CPUs, whereas the i7-11700B uses a soldered BGA package.

The average benchmark score in the database illustrates the overall picture. The i7-11700B has an average score of 5241, placing it at the 60th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-13500TE averages 5002, at the 59th percentile. These are nearly identical overall performance tiers, but the i7-11700B edges ahead by roughly 4.8% in aggregate. The nearest rivals for each chip reinforce this: the i7-11700B sits within 0.6% of the Intel Core i5-13400T and within 0.3% of the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, while the i5-13500TE matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G exactly and sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-1375PRE.

Who should pick which? A user needing maximum compute in a mobile or compact form factor, with no concern for ECC or memory variety, should choose the i7-11700B. Its performance is strictly higher across all recorded tests. A user building a low-power desktop system, especially one requiring ECC memory or the option to use DDR5, should choose the i5-13500TE. The performance penalty is small, around 4.8% in multicore workloads, and the power savings plus platform flexibility may outweigh that deficit.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, and the Intel Core i7-11700B wins all six. The margins are remarkably uniform, which simplifies the analysis. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-11700B scores 1826 against 1743 for the i5-13500TE, a 4.8% lead. The R15 single-core test shows a similar story: 257 versus 246, a 4.5% advantage for the i7-11700B.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the i7-11700B scores 7609 in multicore versus 7263 for the i5-13500TE, again a 4.8% difference. In R20 single-core, the scores are 1074 and 1025, a 4.8% gap. The largest absolute differences appear in Cinebench R23, where the i7-11700B posts 18119 multicore and the i5-13500TE posts 17294, a 4.8% margin. The R23 single-core test shows 2558 versus 2441, which is also a 4.8% difference.

The consistency of these margins suggests a fundamental clock speed or architectural advantage for the i7-11700B, despite its older Tiger Lake architecture. The i7-11700B boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the i5-13500TE boosts to 4.50 GHz, a 0.30 GHz difference that likely explains much of the single-core gap. In multicore, the i5-13500TE's extra cores (14 versus 8) do not translate into a win, as the i7-11700B's higher base clock of 3.20 GHz, compared to the i5-13500TE's 1300.00 MHz base clock, appears to compensate. The i5-13500TE's base clock figure is unusually low, which suggests heavy power limiting, and that is reflected in its multicore scores.

The overall win count stands at 6 for the i7-11700B and 0 for the i5-13500TE. No recorded test favors the newer chip. The average benchmark scores confirm this hierarchy: 5241 for the i7-11700B versus 5002 for the i5-13500TE, a difference of 239 points or roughly 4.8%. In percentile terms, the i7-11700B ranks at the 60th percentile of all CPUs, one point higher than the i5-13500TE at the 59th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every key specification field. The most obvious difference is core count: the i7-11700B has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-13500TE has 14 cores and 20 threads. The i5-13500TE also has a much lower TDP of 35 watts, versus 65 watts for the i7-11700B. The base clocks are starkly different, with the i7-11700B running at 3.20 GHz and the i5-13500TE running at 1300.00 MHz. Boost clocks are closer: 4.80 GHz for the i7-11700B and 4.50 GHz for the i5-13500TE.

The sockets are incompatible. The i7-11700B uses Intel BGA 1787, a mobile soldered socket, while the i5-13500TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop LGA socket. Memory support diverges as well. The i7-11700B supports only DDR4, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The i5-13500TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, though its bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory is supported on the i5-13500TE but not on the i7-11700B.

PCIe capability also differs. The i7-11700B offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the i5-13500TE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are different: the i7-11700B has UHD Graphics (Xe-LP), while the i5-13500TE has UHD Graphics 770. The market segments reflect their physical designs, with the i7-11700B classified as mobile and the i5-13500TE as desktop.

Production status and release dates are distinct. The i7-11700B was released in May 2021 and is now end-of-life. The i5-13500TE was released in January 2023 and remains active. The i5-13500TE has a launch MSRP of $235, while the i7-11700B has no recorded launch MSRP. The part numbers are also different: SRKU5 for the i7-11700B and SRMFZ for the i5-13500TE. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking.

Architecture Differences

The i7-11700B is built on Tiger Lake-H, Intel's 10 nm mobile architecture. Its die measures 190 mm². The i5-13500TE uses Raptor Lake-S, also on a 10 nm process, but with a larger die of 215 mm². Both processors are manufactured by Intel and use the same 10 nm process node. The architecture names reflect their different design targets: Tiger Lake-H is optimized for high-performance mobile systems, while Raptor Lake-S is a desktop architecture with a focus on efficiency in this particular TE variant.

Cache configurations are identical on paper. Both chips have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The database does not list transistor counts for either processor. The i5-13500TE's larger die size of 215 mm², compared to 190 mm² for the i7-11700B, likely accommodates its additional cores, but the cache layout per core remains the same.

The core count difference is the primary architectural distinction. The i5-13500TE has 14 cores and 20 threads, which implies a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake, though the database does not specify performance versus efficiency core types. The i7-11700B has a uniform 8-core, 16-thread layout. The i5-13500TE's 35 watt TDP, combined with 14 cores, suggests heavily power-constrained operation, which aligns with its low base clock of 1300.00 MHz. The i7-11700B runs at a much higher base clock of 3.20 GHz within a 65 watt envelope, indicating a more conventional power curve.

The integrated graphics differ architecturally as well. The i7-11700B uses UHD Graphics (Xe-LP), Intel's Xe-LP graphics architecture from Tiger Lake. The i5-13500TE uses UHD Graphics 770, which is the newer Raptor Lake integrated GPU. PCIe support also differs: the i7-11700B provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the i5-13500TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a newer but narrower connection.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-11700B wins in every measured performance category. All six Cinebench tests, including multicore and single-core variants, go to the i7-11700B. The largest percentage lead is 4.8%, which appears in R15 multicore, R20 multicore, R20 single-core, R23 multicore, and R23 single-core. The smallest lead is 4.5% in R15 single-core. The i7-11700B also wins in average benchmark score, 5241 versus 5002, and in percentile ranking, 60th versus 59th.

The i5-13500TE wins in areas not covered by Cinebench. It has a 35 watt TDP, which is 30 watts lower than the i7-11700B, indicating superior power efficiency for thermally constrained systems. It supports ECC memory, which the i7-11700B does not, making it suitable for workstation or server applications where data integrity is critical. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more flexibility in memory selection. It uses a desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, which enables CPU replacement without soldering, unlike the BGA package of the i7-11700B. It also has PCIe Gen 5 support, albeit with fewer lanes (16 versus 20), which may matter for future expansion cards.

For workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, or any task that scales with Cinebench scores, the i7-11700B is the stronger choice. Its multicore performance is consistently 4.8% higher across R15, R20, and R23. For single-threaded tasks such as legacy software or lightly threaded applications, the i7-11700B again leads, with single-core scores 4.5% to 4.8% higher. The i7-11700B is the pick for raw compute density.

The i5-13500TE is the pick for low-power desktop builds, silent systems, or any scenario where the 35 watt TDP and ECC support are decisive. Its performance deficit is modest, around 4.8% in multicore, which many users will not notice in everyday tasks. The ability to use DDR5 memory and a standard LGA socket adds long-term flexibility. The i5-13500TE is also an active product, while the i7-11700B is end-of-life, which may affect availability and long-term support. The i5-13500TE's launch MSRP of $235 provides a reference point for its market positioning, though the i7-11700B has no recorded launch price.

In summary, the i7-11700B wins every benchmark, but the i5-13500TE wins the platform argument. The choice depends on whether the user values maximum measured performance or lower power consumption, ECC support, and memory flexibility.