Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i5-14500T are both 10 nm Raptor Lake desktop parts on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they target very different design goals. The data shows a complete sweep: the 13490F wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with its average benchmark score of 28185 sitting just 0.4% above the 14500T's 28065. Both CPUs land in the 80th percentile among all tested processors, placing them in the same performance tier overall, yet the distribution of wins reveals a much larger gap in specific workloads than the aggregate scores suggest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation occurs in the Cinebench suite. In the R23 multi-core test, the 13490F scores 22747 against the 14500T's 11790, a 92.9% advantage. That is nearly double the rendering throughput, a massive margin for two CPUs that share the same architecture and appear in the same performance percentile. The R23 single-core test tells a similar story, with the 13490F at 3211 versus 1838, a 74.7% lead. Moving back to Cinebench R20, the multi-core delta shrinks to 16.8% (9553 vs 8177), and the single-core delta is also 16.8% (1348 vs 1154). In Cinebench R15, the 13490F leads by 13.4% in multi-core (2292 vs 2022) and by 28.2% in single-core (323 vs 252).

PassMark results follow the same pattern, though with smaller margins in some areas. The 13490F wins the PassMark multi-thread test by 16% (26569 vs 22910) and the physics test by a commanding 48.7% (1915 vs 1288). The find prime numbers test shows a 40.7% delta (114 vs 81), and extended instructions come in at 29.9% (20837 vs 16043). Data compression shows a 25.1% edge (328397 vs 262417), while random string sorting is 19.6% ahead (34042 vs 28462). Data encryption shows a 16.2% lead (17902 vs 15410). The narrowest margins appear in floating point math (2.4%, 60273 vs 58869), integer math (3.5%, 83723 vs 80922), and single-thread PassMark scores (2.5%, 3828 vs 3736). Notably, the 13490F also has 3DMark results in its benchmark list—7556 for 16 threads, 1959 for 2 threads, 3552 for 4 threads, 5731 for 8 threads, 7550 for max threads, and 1002 for single thread—while the 14500T has no corresponding 3DMark entries in the data, making direct comparison impossible for those tests.

Where Each One Wins

The 13490F wins everywhere the data covers. There is no benchmark in the head-to-head set where the 14500T takes the lead. The closest contest is PassMark single-thread performance, where the 13490F's 3828 beats the 14500T's 3736 by just 2.5%. That small margin suggests both CPUs have similar per-core potential for lightly threaded tasks like everyday desktop responsiveness or legacy software. But the 14500T's 3DMark and GeekBench results exist outside the head-to-head table; its GeekBench multi-core score of 11894 and single-core score of 2229 are not directly comparable to any 13490F GeekBench numbers, since none are listed. The 14500T also has integrated UHD Graphics 770, which the 13490F lacks entirely—meaning the 14500T can output video without a discrete GPU, while the 13490F requires one.

The 14500T's biggest practical advantage is its 35 W TDP against the 13490F's 65 W, a difference that points to dramatically lower power draw and heat output. The 14500T also supports ECC memory, while the 13490F does not. These are not benchmark wins, but they define where each chip fits: the 14500T for compact, low-power, or reliability-focused builds; the 13490F for raw compute performance when power efficiency is secondary.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Core i5-13490F is the clear performance pick. It wins every head-to-head benchmark, with particularly large margins in CPU-intensive workloads like rendering and physics simulation. The R23 multi-core result alone—92.9% faster—makes it the obvious choice for anyone running 3D rendering, video encoding, or other heavily threaded applications. Its average benchmark score of 28185 also edges out the 14500T, and its nearest rival list includes the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at a 0.2% delta, confirming it sits in a competitive mid-range tier.

The Intel Core i5-14500T is the pick for constrained environments. Its 35 W TDP is nearly half the 13490F's 65 W, which matters for small-form-factor systems, passive-cooling builds, or any setup where heat dissipation is a challenge. It also brings integrated graphics and ECC memory support, making it a more self-sufficient and fault-tolerant option. Its average score of 28065 is only 0.4% behind the 13490F overall, so in mixed workloads the difference may be negligible. But the benchmark data is unambiguous: if performance is the priority, the 13490F is the faster chip across the board.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F scores 22747 versus the 14500T's 11790, a 92.9% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14500T have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 14500T includes UHD Graphics 770, while the 13490F has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has a 35 W TDP, compared to the 13490F's 65 W.

Q: How close are the average benchmark scores?

A: The 13490F has an average benchmark score of 28185, and the 14500T scores 28065, a difference of 0.4%.

Q: Do both CPUs support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both the 13490F and 14500T support DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which CPU has more cores?

A: The 14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the 13490F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Architecture Differences

Both CPUs are built on Intel's 10 nm process with the Raptor Lake architecture, and both have the same 215 mm² die size. The 14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename as part of the Core 14th Gen series, a refresh of the original Raptor Lake-S design found in the 13th Gen 13490F. The cache hierarchy is identical: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The 14500T packs more cores (14 vs 10) and more threads (20 vs 16), yet it loses in every benchmark. The 13490F boosts to 4.80 GHz, and the 14500T also boosts to 4.80 GHz, so the clock ceiling matches; the base clocks differ, with the 13490F at 2.50 GHz and the 14500T at 1.70 GHz. The 13490F lacks ECC memory support, while the 14500T includes it, and the 14500T has integrated UHD Graphics 770 while the 13490F has none. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and both are socketed for Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The 14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads versus the 13490F's 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: the 13490F runs at 2.50 GHz, while the 14500T sits at 1.70 GHz; both boost to 4.80 GHz. TDP is a major split—65 W for the 13490F and 35 W for the 14500T. The 14500T supports ECC memory; the 13490F does not. The 14500T includes integrated UHD Graphics 770; the 13490F has no integrated graphics. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses, share the same 24 MB L3 cache, and use the same 10 nm process and 215 mm² die size. The 13490F launched on 2023-02-09 with a launch MSRP of $235, while the 14500T launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $232. Their part numbers differ (SRMC0 for the 13490F, SRN3P for the 14500T), and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The 13490F has 3DMark benchmark scores in its record (7556 for 16 threads, 1959 for 2 threads, 3552 for 4 threads, 5731 for 8 threads, 7550 for max threads, 1002 for single thread), while the 14500T has GeekBench scores instead (11894 multi-core, 2229 single-core). Both CPUs are Active in production status and target the Desktop market segment.