Intel Core i5-1345UE vs Intel Xeon E-2274G Comparison
Intel Core i5-1345UE
Xeon E-2274G
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-1345UE vs Intel Xeon E-2274G
The Intel Core i5-1345UE and Intel Xeon E-2274G occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data makes the outcome clear. Across every recorded Cinebench test, the mobile-oriented Core i5-1345UE beats the workstation Xeon E-2274G. The wins are consistent and narrow, with the i5-1345UE taking all six head-to-head benchmarks. The Xeon E-2274G does not record a single victory in the comparison. That said, the Xeon counters with higher base and boost clocks, a larger PCIe lane count, and ECC memory support, which are factors the raw Cinebench scores do not capture.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest single-core margin appears in Cinebench R15, where the i5-1345UE scores 132 against the Xeon's 117, a 12.8% advantage. The same test in multi-core shows 940 versus 835, a 12.6% lead for the i5-1345UE. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-1345UE records 553 in single-core and 3918 in multi-core, while the Xeon E-2274G manages 491 and 3481 respectively. Both deltas sit at 12.6%. Cinebench R23 continues the pattern: the i5-1345UE posts 1317 single-core and 9329 multi-core, against 1170 and 8289 for the Xeon, with the multi-core gap at 12.5% and the single-core gap at 12.6%.
The consistency of the delta across all three Cinebench versions suggests the performance gap is structural rather than workload-specific. The i5-1345UE's 10 cores and 12 threads outnumber the Xeon's 4 cores and 8 threads, which explains the multi-core advantage. The single-core lead is more surprising given the Xeon's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus the i5-1345UE's 4.60 GHz. The newer Raptor Lake architecture on the 10 nm node appears to deliver better instructions per clock than the Coffee Lake design on 14 nm, allowing the i5-1345UE to win even at a lower peak frequency.
In average benchmark score, the i5-1345UE reaches 2698, while the Xeon E-2274G sits at 2643. The i5-1345UE lands in the 50th percentile of all CPUs, the Xeon in the 49th. The nearest rivals for the i5-1345UE include the Intel Core i7-8700T with an average score of 2701 (a 0.1% delta) and the Intel Xeon E-2226G at 2709 (a 0.4% delta). For the Xeon E-2274G, the closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-5820K at 2642 (0.1% delta), followed by the Intel Core i9-8950HK at 2641 (0.1% delta). These rival comparisons show both chips sit in a crowded mid-field, but the i5-1345UE edges slightly ahead.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear choice for raw compute performance: the Intel Core i5-1345UE wins every benchmark in this comparison. Anyone looking for higher Cinebench scores, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded, should select the i5-1345UE. The 12.5% to 12.8% margins are not overwhelming, but they are uniform and repeatable across three different Cinebench versions.
The Xeon E-2274G remains relevant only for specific platform requirements. It supports ECC memory, which the i5-1345UE does not. It uses Intel Socket 1151 and provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, while the i5-1345UE uses Intel BGA 1744 and provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Xeon targets the server and workstation segment, while the i5-1345UE is a mobile part. If the workload demands ECC memory and a socketed workstation CPU, the Xeon is the only option here. If the workload is purely about processing speed in Cinebench-style tasks, the i5-1345UE is the superior part.
The Xeon's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz does not translate into a win, which indicates that architectural efficiency matters more than raw frequency in these tests. The i5-1345UE's lead in single-core benchmarks, despite a lower boost clock, reinforces that point. The 10 nm Raptor Lake design outperforms the 14 nm Coffee Lake design on a per-clock basis.
FAQ
Q: Which CPU has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?
A: The Intel Core i5-1345UE scores 9329, while the Intel Xeon E-2274G scores 8289. The i5-1345UE leads by 12.5%.
Q: Does the Xeon E-2274G support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2274G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-1345UE does not support ECC memory.
Q: What is the difference in boost clock between the two processors?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2274G has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-1345UE has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Xeon is 0.30 GHz higher.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i5-1345UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Xeon E-2274G has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each CPU?
A: The Intel Core i5-1345UE has an average benchmark score of 2698, and the Intel Xeon E-2274G has an average benchmark score of 2643.
Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i5-1345UE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Xeon E-2274G has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i5-1345UE uses 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2274G uses 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 1400 MHz for the i5-1345UE and 4000 MHz for the Xeon. Boost clocks are 4600 MHz and 4900 MHz respectively. Thermal design power is 15 W for the i5-1345UE and 83 W for the Xeon. The i5-1345UE uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Xeon uses Intel Socket 1151. The i5-1345UE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Xeon supports only DDR4. The i5-1345UE does not support ECC memory, while the Xeon does. The i5-1345UE provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Xeon provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. The i5-1345UE has an integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the Xeon has HD Graphics P630. The Xeon has a listed memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s; the i5-1345UE has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The Xeon's launch MSRP is $328.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Core i5-1345UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. The Intel Xeon E-2274G uses Coffee Lake architecture with the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, fabricated on a 14 nm process. The i5-1345UE has an 80 KB L1 cache per core and a 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, with a 12 MB shared L3 cache. The Xeon has a 64 KB L1 cache per core and a 256 KB L2 cache per core, with an 8 MB shared L3 cache. The Xeon has a die size of 126 mm²; the i5-1345UE does not have a recorded die size. The i5-1345UE belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-U) generation and targets the mobile segment. The Xeon belongs to the Xeon E (Coffee Lake) generation and targets the server and workstation segment. The Xeon is end-of-life in production status, while the i5-1345UE remains active. The Xeon has a part number of SRFDE; the i5-1345UE has no recorded part number.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-1345UE wins in all six recorded Cinebench benchmarks. It is the faster processor for multi-threaded rendering tasks, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9329 against 8289. It also wins single-threaded workloads, with its highest margin at 12.8% in Cinebench R15 single-core. The i5-1345UE is the choice for any application that relies on raw CPU throughput, given its 10-core configuration and newer architecture.
The Intel Xeon E-2274G wins in platform features rather than raw scores. It supports ECC memory, which is critical for data integrity in server and workstation environments. It offers 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, double the 8 Gen 4 lanes of the i5-1345UE, which allows more expansion cards. The Xeon uses a socketed Intel Socket 1151, making it replaceable in a workstation motherboard, whereas the i5-1345UE is soldered to a BGA 1744 mobile board. The Xeon also has a higher boost clock at 4.90 GHz and a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz, which can help in lightly threaded tasks that do not scale with core count.
For workloads that can use the i5-1345UE's 10 cores, the performance gap is decisive. For workloads that require ECC memory validation or a high lane count for multiple GPUs or storage controllers, the Xeon E-2274G is the only one of the two that fits. The data shows a clear performance winner in the i5-1345UE, but the Xeon retains a functional niche that no benchmark score can replace.