Intel Core i5-1345UE vs Intel Core i7-1195G7 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1345UE and Intel Core i7-1195G7 are both mobile processors from Intel, but they belong to different generations and architectures. The i5-1345UE is a Raptor Lake-U part, while the i7-1195G7 is a Tiger Lake-U part. In the database's head-to-head benchmarks, the i5-1345UE wins every Cinebench test, though the overall average scores are close: the i5 records an average benchmark score of 2698 against the i7's 2638, placing them at the 50th and 49th percentiles respectively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison covers six Cinebench tests, spanning R15, R20, and R23, each with multi-core and single-core variants. The i5-1345UE wins all six, with margins ranging from 5.6% to 6.1%. In multi-core workloads, the i5 leads by a consistent 6% across every version. For example, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5 scores 940 against the i7's 887, a 6% advantage. The same pattern holds in R20 (3918 vs 3697) and R23 (9329 vs 8803), each with a 6% delta. This is expected given the i5's higher core count: 10 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the i7.

The single-core results are more surprising. Despite the i7 having a higher boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz), the i5 still wins. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the i5 scores 132 against 125, a 5.6% lead. R20 single-core shows 553 vs 521, a 6.1% margin, and R23 single-core gives 1317 vs 1242, a 6% advantage. This suggests that the Raptor Lake architecture delivers higher instructions per clock than Tiger Lake, offsetting the lower boost frequency. The i5's base clock is also much lower (1.40 GHz versus 2.90 GHz), but that does not affect peak single-thread performance.

The average benchmark scores reinforce the head-to-head picture. The i5's average of 2698 is 60 points higher than the i7's 2638, a difference of about 2.3%. Both processors sit near the middle of the database's performance distribution, with the i5 at the 50th percentile and the i7 at the 49th. The nearest rivals for the i5 include the Intel Core i7-8700T (average 2701, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-1185G7E (2703, -0.2%), while the i7's closest competitors are the Intel Core i9-8950HK (2641, -0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-5820K (2642, -0.1%). These figures show that both CPUs are competitive with older desktop and mobile parts, but the i5 holds a slight edge in the direct comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on the same 10 nm process node, but they use different microarchitectures. The i5-1345UE is based on Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-U, while the i7-1195G7 uses Tiger Lake, specifically Willow Cove-U. This architectural gap explains the performance differences despite similar process technology.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The i5 has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the i7 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The i5's higher core count directly benefits multi-threaded workloads, as seen in the Cinebench multi-core results. Clock speeds also diverge: the i5 has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, whereas the i7 runs at 2.90 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The i7's higher clocks are offset by the i5's architectural efficiency, which is why the i5 wins even in single-core tests.

Thermal design power (TDP) is another differentiator. The i5 is rated at 15 W, while the i7 is rated at 28 W. This makes the i5 more power-efficient, a key consideration for thin-and-light laptops. The socket also differs: the i5 uses Intel BGA 1744, while the i7 uses Intel BGA 1449, meaning they are not pin-compatible.

Memory support varies. The i5 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the i7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the i5 provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the i7 offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The i7's additional lanes could be beneficial for external GPUs or multiple NVMe drives, though this is not reflected in the Cinebench scores.

Integrated graphics also differ. The i5 features Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the i7 has Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units. The i7's higher EU count suggests better iGPU performance for light gaming or media tasks, but again, this is outside the CPU benchmark scope. The i7 also has a specified die size of 144 mm², while the i5's die size is not listed in the database.

Release timing and production status separate the two further. The i5 was released on January 3, 2023, and is marked as Active, while the i7 launched on May 30, 2021, and is now End-of-life. The i7 also has a part number (SRKSC) and a launch MSRP of $426, which can be stated once as a reference point. The i5 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the i5-1345UE wins in every Cinebench test, both multi-core and single-core. This makes it the clear choice for CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The i5's 10-core, 12-thread configuration gives it a substantial advantage in multi-threaded tasks, while its architectural efficiency allows it to outperform the i7 even in single-threaded scenarios.

The i7-1195G7 does have some theoretical advantages. Its higher boost clock (5.00 GHz) could help in lightly threaded applications that are sensitive to raw frequency, but the data shows the i5 still wins in single-core Cinebench. The i7's 16 PCIe lanes (versus 8 on the i5) might be useful for high-bandwidth peripherals, and its 96EU integrated graphics could deliver better iGPU performance than the i5's 80EU. However, these advantages are not captured in the CPU benchmark suite.

The i5 also holds a power efficiency edge, with a 15 W TDP versus the i7's 28 W. This makes the i5 more suitable for fanless or low-power designs, while the i7 may require more robust cooling. Given that the i7 is end-of-life and the i5 is active, the i5 is the more future-proof option for new system designs. For users upgrading from an older Tiger Lake laptop, the i5 offers a measurable performance uplift across the board.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1345UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-1195G7 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to the i5-1345UE's 4.60 GHz.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?

A: The i5-1345UE scores 9329, while the i7-1195G7 scores 8803, giving the i5 a 6% lead.

Q: How do the TDP ratings compare?

A: The i5-1345UE is rated at 15 W, while the i7-1195G7 is rated at 28 W.

Q: Which CPU has better integrated graphics?

A: The i7-1195G7 has Iris Xe-LP Graphics with 96 execution units, while the i5-1345UE has Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units.

Q: Which CPU is newer?

A: The i5-1345UE was released on January 3, 2023, while the i7-1195G7 was released on May 30, 2021.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i5-1345UE | Intel Core i7-1195G7 |

|-------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 1.40 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel BGA 1449 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-U | Tiger Lake-U |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-U) | Core i7 (Willow Cove-U) |

| Die Size | Not specified | 144 mm² |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2021-05-30 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $426 |

| Part Number | Not specified | SRKSC |