Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Xeon W-1290E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a consistent picture: the Intel Xeon W-1290E wins every single head-to-head comparison in the Cinebench suite, taking all six recorded tests. The margins are remarkably uniform, with the Xeon leading by 4.8% in five of the six tests and by 4.7% in the remaining one.

Starting with multi-core workloads, the Xeon W-1290E posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,510 against the Core i5-1340P's 15,716, a 4.8% advantage. The gap narrows slightly in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the Xeon scores 6,934 versus 6,600, again a 4.8% lead. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Xeon's 1,664 edges out the i5's 1,584, with the same 4.8% delta. Across all three multi-core tests, the Xeon W-1290E demonstrates a small but consistent advantage, despite having fewer physical cores.

Single-core results follow nearly the same pattern. The Xeon W-1290E scores 2,330 in Cinebench R23 single-core, beating the i5-1340P's 2,218 by 4.8%. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Xeon's 978 outpaces the i5's 931, again a 4.8% margin. The only slightly different result comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Xeon's 234 beats the i5's 223 by 4.7%. The consistency of these deltas suggests the Xeon's higher boost clock, 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz, provides a steady per-core advantage across all rendering workloads.

The aggregate benchmark average tells a similar story. The Xeon W-1290E records an average benchmark score of 4,775, while the i5-1340P sits at 4,545. This places the Xeon in the 59th percentile of all CPUs in the database, one point above the i5's 58th percentile. The Xeon's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-1350P with an identical 4,776 average score, the AMD EPYC 7252 at 4,772, and the Intel Xeon E-2386G at 4,799. Meanwhile, the i5-1340P's closest competitors include the Intel Core i7-10700KF at 4,547 and the Intel Core i5-1250P at 4,515.

The Xeon W-1290E's performance advantage, while consistent, is modest. A 4.8% lead in rendering benchmarks is measurable but not transformative. The data shows a processor that wins every comparison, yet the margins are tight enough that real-world differences in daily use would likely be subtle.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and target different market segments, which explains much of their performance and feature divergence.

The Intel Core i5-1340P is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P variant, and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 12 cores and 16 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid arrangement typical of modern mobile processors. The i5-1340P uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, indicating its mobile-first design, and carries a 28 W TDP. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and lacks ECC memory support. It offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU and includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU as integrated graphics. The i5-1340P belongs to the mobile segment and was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $353.

The Intel Xeon W-1290E, by contrast, uses Comet Lake architecture and is built on Intel's older 14 nm process node. It packs 10 cores and 20 threads, relying on a more traditional symmetric core design. The Xeon uses the Intel Socket 1200 and has a substantially higher 95 W TDP, reflecting its workstation and server positioning. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a larger 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon supports only DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, a critical feature for workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of Intel UHD Graphics P630. The Xeon targets the server and workstation segment and was released on May 12, 2020, with a launch MSRP of $552. Its die size is recorded at 206 mm².

The architectural differences are stark. The i5-1340P benefits from a newer process node and architecture, which helps it achieve competitive performance at a fraction of the power envelope. The Xeon W-1290E compensates with higher clock speeds and a larger L3 cache, along with workstation-specific features like ECC memory support. The Xeon also has more threads despite fewer cores, thanks to a 10-core, 20-thread configuration that uses two threads per core on all cores, while the i5-1340P's 12 cores and 16 threads indicate a mix of performance and efficiency cores with fewer total threads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Xeon W-1290E scores 16,510 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i5-1340P scores 15,716. The Xeon leads by 4.8%.

Q: Does the Core i5-1340P win any benchmark comparisons?

A: No. The recorded head-to-head data shows the Xeon W-1290E winning all six Cinebench tests, including all multi-core and single-core variants. The i5-1340P records zero wins in the head-to-head set.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Core i5-1340P has 12 cores and 16 threads. The Xeon W-1290E has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Xeon achieves more threads with fewer cores by using two threads per core across all 10 cores.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon W-1290E supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-1340P does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Core i5-1340P has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Xeon W-1290E has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which explains its consistent single-core advantage in the benchmark results.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores and percentile rankings?

A: The Xeon W-1290E has an average benchmark score of 4,775 and sits in the 59th percentile of all CPUs. The Core i5-1340P has an average benchmark score of 4,545 and sits in the 58th percentile.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice for users prioritizing raw rendering performance: the Intel Xeon W-1290E. It wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark, with a consistent 4.8% lead across both single-core and multi-core tests. Its higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz and larger 20 MB L3 cache contribute to this edge. The Xeon also brings workstation-specific capabilities that the i5-1340P lacks, including ECC memory support and a server/workstation market segment designation. For anyone building a system where data integrity and stability in professional workloads matter, the Xeon W-1290E is the justified pick.

The Intel Core i5-1340P, however, has its own strengths that the benchmark scores do not fully capture. It operates at a 28 W TDP versus the Xeon's 95 W, making it far more suitable for power-constrained mobile environments. Its newer Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process allows it to approach the Xeon's performance while consuming roughly a third of the power. The i5 also supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4, features the older Xeon lacks. The i5-1340P's 12 cores and hybrid design, combined with its mobile socket, indicate a processor built for laptops and compact systems where efficiency takes priority over maximum throughput.

The choice depends on the use case. Workstation builders requiring ECC memory, higher sustained multi-threaded performance, and a traditional desktop socket should select the Xeon W-1290E. Mobile users or those building power-efficient compact systems should choose the Core i5-1340P, accepting a 4.8% performance deficit in exchange for dramatically lower power consumption and newer platform features. The performance gap, while uniform, is modest enough that the Xeon's advantages in reliability features and the i5's advantages in efficiency will likely weigh more heavily than the raw benchmark differences.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1340P | Intel Xeon W-1290E |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.90 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 95 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 46.9 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2020-05-12 |

| Launch MSRP | $353 | $552 |

| Part Number | SRMJ7 | SRJFB |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 206 mm² |