Intel Core i5-13400E vs Intel Core i7-12800HE Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-13400E

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-12800HE

CORE STATE Alder Lake-H
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE —

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,313
2,253
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
326
318
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,639
9,391
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,360
1,325
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,950
22,360
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,240
3,156

Analysis: Intel Core i5-13400E vs Intel Core i7-12800HE

The Intel Core i7-12800HE and Intel Core i5-13400E are both active, 10 nm Intel parts, but they target different physical envelopes and generations. The benchmark data shows a remarkably consistent outcome: the i5-13400E wins every single Cinebench test in the head-to-head comparison, though by a narrow margin. The i5-13400E takes the R15 multicore test with a score of 2313 against 2253 for the i7-12800HE, a 2.6% lead. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern, with the i5 scoring 326 versus 318, a 2.5% advantage. This consistency extends through the newer R20 and R23 suites, where the i5-13400E leads by exactly 2.6% in every workload. In R20 multicore, the i5 scores 9639 against 9391, and in R23 multicore it posts 22950 versus 22360. The single-core results in R20 (1360 vs 1325) and R23 (3240 vs 3156) confirm that the i5-13400E is uniformly faster, albeit by a small margin that will be hard to notice in daily use.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking aspect of this comparison is the uniformity of the results. The Intel Core i5-13400E wins all six benchmark comparisons, with a delta of 2.6% in the multicore tests and 2.5% to 2.6% in the single-core tests. This is not a case of one chip winning in multi-threaded loads while the other wins in lightly-threaded tasks; the i5-13400E simply has a slight edge across the board. The largest absolute gap is in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, where the i5 scores 22950 versus 22360 for the i7-12800HE. That 590-point difference represents the most significant performance separation, yet it still amounts to less than a 3% margin. For single-core workloads, the R23 test shows the i5 leading with 3240 versus 3156, an 84-point spread. These numbers tell a story of two processors that are effectively in the same performance class, with the i5-13400E consistently ahead by a small but measurable amount.

Looking at the broader context, both processors sit at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. The i7-12800HE has an average benchmark score of 6467, while the i5-13400E averages 6638. This puts the i5 roughly 2.6% ahead on average, which aligns perfectly with the individual test deltas. The nearest rivals for the i7-12800HE include the Intel Xeon D-2796TE (avg score 6510, delta -0.7%), the Intel Xeon W-2191B (6531, -1%), and the Intel Core i9-7960X (6533, -1%). The i5-13400E's nearest rivals are led by the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647, -0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-9940X (6657, -0.3%). Notably, the i5-13400E's own sibling, the Intel Core i9-12900E, is only 0.4% behind it with a score of 6611. This positioning suggests that both chips are squarely in the upper-midrange tier of desktop and mobile performance, with the i5 holding a slight edge that places it just above the i7 in the ranking order.

The Verdict

From a pure performance standpoint, the Intel Core i5-13400E is the clear winner. It outperforms the i7-12800HE in every single benchmark test, from Cinebench R15 to R23, in both single-core and multicore scenarios. The margin is consistent at around 2.6%, which is small but decisive. If your priority is maximum benchmark scores, the i5-13400E is the chip to choose. However, the choice is not purely about performance. The i7-12800HE is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, while the i5-13400E is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP. The i7 is designed for laptops and compact systems, whereas the i5 is meant for standard desktop builds. The i7-12800HE uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform, while the i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which allows for future CPU swaps. For a builder assembling a new desktop, the i5-13400E offers better performance and upgradeability. For someone working within a mobile form factor, the i7-12800HE is the only viable option of the two, even with its slight performance deficit.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and microarchitectures. The Intel Core i7-12800HE is based on Alder Lake, specifically the Alder Lake-H variant, while the Intel Core i5-13400E is based on Raptor Lake, the Raptor Lake-S variant. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process and fabricated by Intel, but the i5 is a newer design. The i7-12800HE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the i5 manages to outperform the i7, which indicates that the Raptor Lake cores are more efficient per-core than the Alder Lake cores. The cache configurations also differ: both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, but the i7 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache while the i5 has 20 MB. The i7's larger L3 cache does not translate into a performance advantage in these benchmarks.

The memory support is identical on paper, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. However, there are key differences in other specifications. The i7-12800HE supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the i5-13400E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This is a significant architectural difference, as the i5 offers a newer PCIe standard, though fewer lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well: the i7 has Iris Xe 96EU, while the i5 has UHD Graphics 730. The i5 also supports ECC memory, which is a feature the i7 lacks. The i7 has a die size of 217 mm², while the i5 is slightly smaller at 215 mm². Both have a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which matches their identical clock speed specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800HE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Is the i5-13400E always faster than the i7-12800HE?

A: Yes, the i5-13400E wins all six Cinebench benchmarks, with a consistent lead of 2.5% to 2.6% in both single-core and multicore tests.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but only the i5-13400E supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in PCIe support?

A: The i7-12800HE supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the i5-13400E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Are both processors on the same socket?

A: No, the i7-12800HE uses Intel BGA 1744 (a mobile, soldered socket), while the i5-13400E uses Intel Socket 1700 (a desktop, upgradeable socket).

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i7-12800HE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-13400E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13400E wins in every measured performance category. The data shows it is faster in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, covering both single-core and multicore workloads. The average benchmark score of 6638 for the i5 versus 6467 for the i7 confirms this across the board. The i5 also wins on platform flexibility, as it uses the standard Socket 1700, which is compatible with a wide range of desktop motherboards and allows for future CPU upgrades. Its support for PCIe Gen 5 and ECC memory makes it a more feature-rich choice for a desktop workstation. The i7-12800HE, on the other hand, wins in the mobile segment. With a 45 W TDP, it is designed for laptops and compact systems where power efficiency is critical. It has more cores (14 vs 10) and more threads (20 vs 16), which could be an advantage in highly parallel workloads if power and thermals are not constrained, although the benchmark data does not reflect this. The i7 also has a larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB) and a higher-end integrated GPU (Iris Xe 96EU vs UHD Graphics 730), which makes it a better choice for a mobile device that needs decent graphics performance without a discrete GPU.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences between the two processors are as follows. The i7-12800HE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The TDP differs significantly: the i7 is rated at 45 W, while the i5 is rated at 65 W. The sockets are different: the i7 uses Intel BGA 1744, and the i5 uses Intel Socket 1700. The architecture and codename differ: the i7 is Alder Lake (Alder Lake-H), and the i5 is Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-S). The L3 cache sizes are different: 24 MB for the i7, 20 MB for the i5. The PCIe support differs: the i7 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the i5 has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics differ: the i7 has Iris Xe 96EU, and the i5 has UHD Graphics 730. The i5 supports ECC memory, while the i7 does not. The die size is slightly different: 217 mm² for the i7, 215 mm² for the i5. Both have the same base clock (2.40 GHz) and boost clock (4.60 GHz), and both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The i5-13400E was released on 2023-01-03, while the i7-12800HE has no listed release date. Both processors are active in production and neither has a launch MSRP listed.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-13400E
i7-12800HE
Core Specs
Cores
10
14 +40.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.4 0.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.6 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.4 0.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.6 0.0%
Multiplier
24
24 0.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
20 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
45 -30.8%
PL1
65 W
45 W
PL2
148 W
115 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Alder Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake)
Core i7 (Alder Lake-H)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
217 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
H610, H610E, Q670, Q670E, R680E, W680
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
1800 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Iris Xe 96EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
SRMG5
SRLE6
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i5-13400E Details View Core i7-12800HE Details