Intel Core i5-1335UE vs Intel Xeon E-2324G Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-1335UE versus the Intel Xeon E-2324G shows a complete sweep in the head-to-head Cinebench tests, with the i5-1335UE winning all six recorded comparisons. The margins are consistent and substantial, ranging from a 13.6% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core to a 14.3% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, Cinebench R20 multi-core, and Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Starting with multi-core performance, the i5-1335UE scores 1013 in Cinebench R15 multi-core against the Xeon E-2324G's 886, a delta of 14.3%. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the i5-1335UE posts 4221 versus 3694, again a 14.3% gap. The Cinebench R23 multi-core results follow the same pattern: 10052 for the i5-1335UE and 8797 for the Xeon, a 14.3% difference. These multi-core wins are notable because the i5-1335UE is a 15 W mobile processor with 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2324G is a 65 W server/workstation chip with only 4 cores and 4 threads. The higher core count of the i5-1335UE appears to drive a consistent performance advantage across all three Cinebench multi-core tests.

Single-core results tell a similar story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the i5-1335UE scores 142 against the Xeon's 125, a 13.6% advantage. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 595 for the i5-1335UE versus 521 for the Xeon, a 14.2% delta. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i5-1335UE records 1419 against 1242, a 14.3% lead. The i5-1335UE's boost clock is listed at 4.50 GHz, while the Xeon E-2324G boosts to 4.60 GHz, yet the i5-1335UE still manages to win every single-core test by roughly 14%. This suggests architectural efficiency differences play a role, as the Raptor Lake design on a 10 nm node outperforms the Rocket Lake design on a 14 nm node despite the Xeon's slightly higher peak clock.

It is importantly the Xeon E-2324G has two additional benchmark scores in the database (Geekbench multi-core at 5257 and Geekbench single-core at 2059), but the head-to-head comparison only includes Cinebench tests. Therefore, the six wins for the i5-1335UE and zero wins for the Xeon E-2324G are based solely on the Cinebench suite. The average benchmark score in the database also reflects the i5-1335UE's edge: 2907 for the i5-1335UE versus 2823 for the Xeon E-2324G, a difference of about 3%.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-1335UE is the clear performance winner in every head-to-head test. The i5-1335UE leads by roughly 14% in all six Cinebench comparisons, both single-core and multi-core. If the selection criterion is raw Cinebench throughput, the i5-1335UE is the better choice without qualification.

The Intel Xeon E-2324G does not win a single recorded benchmark, but it has strengths that are not reflected in the Cinebench scores. The Xeon E-2324G supports ECC memory, has a larger PCIe lane allocation (20 lanes versus 8 lanes for the i5-1335UE), and is designed for the server/workstation segment with a 65 W TDP. The i5-1335UE, by contrast, is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

For users who prioritize Cinebench-style rendering performance and lower power consumption, the i5-1335UE is the obvious pick. For those who need ECC memory support, more PCIe lanes for expansion, or a server-oriented feature set, the Xeon E-2324G may be the appropriate choice despite its lower benchmark scores. The data does not show any performance scenario where the Xeon E-2324G wins, so the decision must rest on non-benchmark features.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core i5-1335UE scores 10052 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G scores 8797, giving the i5-1335UE a 14.3% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2324G win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No, the Xeon E-2324G wins zero of the six recorded head-to-head tests. The i5-1335UE wins all six, with deltas ranging from 13.6% to 14.3%.

Q: What is the single-core Cinebench R20 score for each processor?

A: The i5-1335UE scores 595 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and the Xeon E-2324G scores 521, a 14.2% lead for the i5-1335UE.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-1335UE does not.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i5-1335UE has an average benchmark score of 2907, which is 84 points higher than the Xeon E-2324G's average of 2823.

Q: What is the memory support difference?

A: The i5-1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Xeon E-2324G supports only DDR4 memory.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The Intel Core i5-1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: the i5-1335UE runs at 1300 MHz, while the Xeon E-2324G runs at 3100 MHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the i5-1335UE at 4.50 GHz and the Xeon E-2324G at 4.60 GHz.

Thermal design power is a major differentiator: the i5-1335UE is rated at 15 W, while the Xeon E-2324G is rated at 65 W. The socket types are incompatible: the i5-1335UE uses Intel BGA 1744, while the Xeon E-2324G uses Intel Socket 1200. The i5-1335UE is a mobile processor, whereas the Xeon E-2324G is a server/workstation processor.

Cache configurations also differ. The i5-1335UE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon E-2324G has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon E-2324G has a listed die size of 276 mm², while the i5-1335UE has no die size recorded.

Memory support differs: the i5-1335UE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Xeon E-2324G supports only DDR4. The Xeon E-2324G has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the i5-1335UE has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported only on the Xeon E-2324G. PCIe lanes differ as well: the i5-1335UE has 8 lanes, while the Xeon E-2324G has 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the i5-1335UE uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the Xeon E-2324G uses UHD Graphics P750. The i5-1335UE was released on 2023-01-03, while the Xeon E-2324G was released on 2021-09-07. The Xeon E-2324G has a launch MSRP of $209, and its part number is SRKN7.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is significant. The Intel Core i5-1335UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-U codename, and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Intel Xeon E-2324G is built on Rocket Lake architecture, specifically the Rocket Lake-E codename, and uses a 14 nm process node from Intel. The i5-1335UE is part of the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-U) generation, while the Xeon E-2324G is part of the Xeon E (Rocket Lake-E) generation.

The core topology differs fundamentally. The i5-1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, which implies a hybrid arrangement with more cores than threads. The Xeon E-2324G has 4 cores and 4 threads, a straightforward 4-core, 4-thread configuration. The i5-1335UE's L2 cache is larger per core at 1.25 MB, versus 512 KB per core for the Xeon E-2324G. The L3 cache is also larger on the i5-1335UE at 12 MB shared, compared to 8 MB shared on the Xeon E-2324G.

The Xeon E-2324G belongs to the Xeon E-2300 series and has a die size of 276 mm², which is larger than what would be expected from a 4-core part on 14 nm. The i5-1335UE does not have a listed die size or transistor count. The i5-1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, indicating a newer memory controller, while the Xeon E-2324G is limited to DDR4. The Xeon E-2324G supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i5-1335UE.

The i5-1335UE integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, which is a more capable integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics P750 found on the Xeon E-2324G. The i5-1335UE has 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Xeon E-2324G has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, reflecting the server-oriented expansion capability of the Xeon part. The process node difference (10 nm versus 14 nm) likely contributes to the i5-1335UE's higher benchmark scores despite its much lower TDP of 15 W versus 65 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-1335UE wins all recorded benchmark tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1013 versus 886 for the Xeon E-2324G. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 142 versus 125. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, it scores 4221 versus 3694. In Cinebench R20 single-core, it scores 595 versus 521. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 10052 versus 8797. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1419 versus 1242. Every delta is between 13.6% and 14.3%, so the i5-1335UE wins by a consistent margin across all workload types.

The Intel Xeon E-2324G wins no benchmark tests, but it wins on feature set. It supports ECC memory, which is critical for reliability in server or workstation environments. It has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, enabling more expansion cards or storage devices compared to the i5-1335UE's 8 lanes. The Xeon E-2324G has a higher base clock of 3100 MHz and a slightly higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which may matter in scenarios where sustained clock speed is prioritized over burst performance. It also has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, though the i5-1335UE has no comparable figure in the database.

For rendering workloads as measured by Cinebench, the i5-1335UE is the superior processor. For server deployments requiring ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, and a workstation-oriented socket, the Xeon E-2324G is the only viable option between the two. The i5-1335UE's lower TDP of 15 W makes it suitable for mobile or power-constrained designs, while the Xeon E-2324G's 65 W TDP and Socket 1200 target traditional server motherboards. The i5-1335UE's dual memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) offers more flexibility in system design, while the Xeon E-2324G's single memory type simplifies compatibility with existing DDR4 server platforms.