AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Intel Core i5-1335U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Core i5-1335U are two mobile processors that target similar thin-and-light laptops but deliver contrasting performance profiles. Benchmark data reveals a clear split: the AMD chip dominates multi-threaded and specialized workloads, while the Intel chip holds a decisive edge in single-core tasks. Their overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical—19047 for the AMD and 18982 for the Intel—placing both in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. The head-to-head results show the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS winning 9 of 15 tests, with the Intel Core i5-1335U taking the remaining 6.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking divergence appears in PassMark’s extended instruction test, where the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 15411 against the Intel Core i5-1335U’s 8974. That is a 71.7% advantage for AMD, the largest margin in any shared benchmark. This suggests the Zen 3+ architecture handles AVX-style workloads with far greater efficiency than Raptor Lake-U. Similarly, in data compression, the AMD chip posts 221668 versus 159593, a 38.9% lead. Data encryption shows the same pattern: 13656 for AMD against 10009 for Intel, a 36.4% gap. These are not marginal differences; they represent a substantial performance tier gap in compute-heavy, non-gaming tasks.

The AMD processor also wins the general multi-threaded race. PassMark multithread scores put the Ryzen 5 7535HS at 17914, which is 25.4% higher than the Intel’s 14281. Integer math follows suit with a 21.7% advantage (62372 vs 51244). Random string sorting goes to AMD by 26.9% (22781 vs 17953). Even in floating-point math, where the margin shrinks, AMD still leads 35540 to 35176, a modest 1% edge. The only close loss for AMD is in PassMark’s prime number finding, where the scores are 49 and 48—a 2.1% difference that is effectively a tie. Physics simulation also favors AMD narrowly, 844 to 837, a 0.8% gap.

The Intel Core i5-1335U, however, owns single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 1684.5 against AMD’s 1445, a substantial 14.2% lead. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a similar story: 238 vs 232, a 2.5% advantage. PassMark single-thread confirms this, with Intel at 3336 versus AMD’s 3123, a 6.4% delta. Interestingly, Intel also wins the multi-core Cinebench tests despite having a lower TDP. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 8889.5 versus AMD’s 8613, a 3.1% lead. Cinebench R15 multi-core goes to Intel by a hair: 1464 vs 1457, only 0.5%. This means Intel’s hybrid core design can outpace AMD’s uniform six-core setup in time-limited rendering workloads, even though AMD wins sustained multithreaded PassMark tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core i5-1335U leads in all single-thread benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1684.5 versus the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS’s 1445, a 14.2% delta. PassMark single-thread shows a smaller but consistent edge: 3336 vs 3123, a 6.4% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-threaded rendering?

A: The results are mixed. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel wins 8889.5 to 8613 (3.1% lead). However, in PassMark multithread, AMD wins convincingly with 17914 versus 14281, a 25.4% advantage. The Cinebench result may reflect short-duration boost behavior, while PassMark’s longer test favors AMD’s sustained output.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap in either direction?

A: The largest delta is AMD’s 71.7% lead in PassMark extended instructions (15411 vs 8974). The second-largest is AMD’s 38.9% win in data compression. Intel’s biggest win is a 14.2% margin in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: Do both processors have the same thread count?

A: Yes, both have 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS achieves this with 6 physical cores, while the Intel Core i5-1335U uses 10 physical cores (with a hybrid architecture) to reach the same thread count.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average benchmark score of 19047, compared to the Intel Core i5-1335U’s 18982. The difference is 0.3%, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to the AMD in integer math?

A: AMD wins PassMark integer math with 62372 versus Intel’s 51244, a 21.7% advantage. This indicates stronger general-purpose arithmetic throughput for the Ryzen 5 7535HS.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is the clear choice for workloads that rely on sustained multi-threaded execution and data manipulation. Its wins in PassMark multithread (25.4% over Intel), integer math (21.7%), and random string sorting (26.9%) make it better suited for software compilation, video encoding, database operations, and scientific computing. The massive 71.7% lead in extended instructions suggests it is also superior for cryptography, financial modeling, and any application using advanced SIMD instructions. Data compression and encryption workloads, where AMD leads by 38.9% and 36.4% respectively, are another stronghold—this chip will handle archive extraction and full-disk encryption more comfortably.

The Intel Core i5-1335U wins in scenarios where single-thread latency and short burst performance matter most. Its 14.2% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core makes it preferable for lightweight productivity apps, web browsing, and responsive UI interactions. The 6.4% PassMark single-thread advantage reinforces this. Intel also edges out AMD in both Cinebench multi-core tests, which suggests it may be faster in brief rendering tasks that finish quickly before thermal throttling kicks in. For users who prioritize snappy day-to-day feel and occasional short rendering bursts over sustained throughput, the Intel chip has a measurable edge.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in core configuration and power envelope. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-1335U has 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ dramatically: AMD runs at 3.30 GHz, while Intel’s base is listed at 1300.00 MHz—a figure that reflects the efficiency cores in Intel’s hybrid design. Boost clocks are nearly identical, with AMD at 4.55 GHz and Intel at 4.60 GHz. The TDP tells a different story: AMD is rated at 35 watts, while Intel is rated at 15 watts. This makes the Intel chip more suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs, though AMD’s higher power budget explains its sustained multi-threaded dominance.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-1335U supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but has no listed bandwidth figure. PCIe connectivity is another differentiator: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP7, whereas Intel uses Intel BGA 1744. Both processors have an integrated GPU, but they are not the same: AMD features Radeon 660M, while Intel has Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Neither supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is built on Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. It uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core i5-1335U uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, with a 10 nm process node from Intel. These process differences explain some of the power and efficiency characteristics, though Intel’s hybrid core layout is the larger factor in its behavior.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. While Intel has more per-core L1 and L2, AMD’s larger shared L3 (16 MB vs 12 MB) may benefit workloads that share data across cores. Both processors are manufactured with distinct transistor layouts—AMD’s 6 nm process from TSMC versus Intel’s 10 nm process—though neither lists transistor counts. The AMD chip’s 35-watt TDP and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes suggest a more desktop-like connectivity suite, while Intel’s 15-watt TDP and 8 lanes target lower-power integration. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $340; the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. Both are active in production and were released on the same date, January 3, 2023.