Intel Core i5-12450HX vs Intel Core i7-1360P Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data splits these two mobile processors along clear lines. The Intel Core i7-1360P wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i5-12450HX wins 5. That raw win count, however, flatters the i7 in overall impact. The average benchmark score for the i5-12450HX is 24576, marginally ahead of the i7-1360P’s 24344. The i5 also holds a slightly better percentile rank at 77 versus 76 for the i7. In practice, the i7-1360P is the more consistent performer across most workloads, but the i5-12450HX delivers a decisive single-core advantage in one key test and superior extended instruction throughput.

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded rendering in the latest Cinebench iteration, the i5-12450HX edges ahead by 1.1% in R23 multi-core. For nearly everything else, the i7-1360P is the safer choice. The i7 wins both R15 and R20 multi-core tests by margins of 18.6% and 3.5%, respectively, and dominates integer math with a 15.9% lead. The i5-12450HX, despite having fewer cores and threads, counters with a 15.9% win in R23 single-core and a 19.4% advantage in extended instructions. The verdict: the i7-1360P suits mixed workloads and general productivity, while the i5-12450HX appeals to users who need specific single-core performance and advanced instruction set efficiency.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1360P establishes its dominance in classic multi-core benchmarks and integer-heavy tasks. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1858 against the i5’s 1512, a substantial 18.6% gap. The R20 multi-core test shows a narrower 3.5% lead, with scores of 6530 versus 6304. PassMark integer math heavily favors the i7, which posts 67963 against 57189, a 15.9% advantage. Prime number finding is a standout for the i7, winning by 30.8% (78 versus 54). Floating-point math also goes to the i7 by 6.2% (45997 versus 43126). Physics simulation and multithread tests follow the same pattern, with the i7 ahead by 15.2% and 1.9%, respectively. Data encryption leans slightly to the i7 at 2.8%.

The Intel Core i5-12450HX claims its wins in more specialized areas. The most significant is Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 2119 against the i7’s 1829, a 15.9% margin. Extended instructions favor the i5 by 19.4% (13832 versus 11581). Data compression is another clear win, with the i5 posting 219707 versus 203746, a 7.8% edge. Random string sorting goes to the i5 by 3.5% (23306 versus 22522). The R23 multi-core test is a narrow 1.1% win for the i5 (11390 versus 11266.5). These results suggest the i5 excels in scenarios that leverage its specific cache hierarchy and instruction handling, while the i7 is broadly faster in conventional throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use different underlying designs. The i5-12450HX is built on Alder Lake architecture with the codename Alder Lake-HX, while the i7-1360P uses Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-P. Both are fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node. The core configurations differ notably: the i5 has 8 cores and 12 threads, whereas the i7 has 12 cores and 16 threads. The i5 features a larger L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB, while the i7 doubles that to 2 MB per core. The i7 compensates for the per-core difference with a larger shared L3 cache of 18 MB versus the i5’s 12 MB. Both have identical L1 caches at 80 KB per core.

Clock speeds separate them further. The i5 has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the i7 operates at a lower 2.20 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.00 GHz. Power envelopes differ substantially, with the i5 rated at 55W TDP and the i7 at a more efficient 28W. The socket types are incompatible: the i5 uses Intel BGA 1964, while the i7 uses Intel BGA 1744. PCIe support also diverges, with the i5 offering Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and the i7 limited to Gen 4 with the same lane count.

Integrated graphics separate the two as well. The i5 carries UHD Graphics 710, while the i7 features the more capable Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and neither supports ECC memory. The i5 has an unlocked multiplier, while the i7 is locked. The i5’s die size is listed at 215 mm², while the i7’s is not specified. Release dates differ by roughly eight months, with the i5 launching in May 2022 and the i7 in January 2023. Launch MSRP for the i5 is $284; launch MSRP for the i7 is $480.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better overall multi-core performance?

A: The data is mixed. The i7-1360P wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 18.6% and R20 by 3.5%, but the i5-12450HX wins R23 multi-core by 1.1%. The PassMark multithread test slightly favors the i7 by 1.9% (18632 versus 18274).

Q: Is the i5-12450HX faster in single-core tests?

A: No, not consistently. The i7-1360P wins R15 single-core by 17.4% and R20 single-core by 3.5%. However, the i5-12450HX wins R23 single-core decisively by 15.9% (2119 versus 1829). PassMark single-thread also goes to the i7 by 3.5%.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest delta is in PassMark find_prime_numbers, where the i7-1360P leads by 30.8% (78 versus 54). The second-largest is in PassMark extended_instructions, where the i5-12450HX leads by 19.4% (13832 versus 11581).

Q: Do they support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. Neither supports ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i7-1360P boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the i5-12450HX boosts to 4.40 GHz. The i5, however, has a higher base clock at 2.40 GHz versus 2.20 GHz.

Q: Are the sockets interchangeable?

A: No. The i5-12450HX uses Intel BGA 1964, while the i7-1360P uses Intel BGA 1744. They are physically incompatible.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided results define the comparison. The i7-1360P crushes the i5-12450HX in Cinebench R15 multi-core with a score of 1858 against 1512, a 18.6% margin. The single-core version of that same test shows a 17.4% gap, with the i7 scoring 258 versus 213. In PassMark find_prime_numbers, the i7’s 78 beats the i5’s 54 by a commanding 30.8%. Integer math follows with a 15.9% lead for the i7 (67963 versus 57189). Physics simulation goes to the i7 by 15.2% (1280 versus 1086). Floating-point math favors the i7 by 6.2% (45997 versus 43126). The PassMark multithread test is close, with the i7 ahead just 1.9% (18632 versus 18274). Data encryption is nearly even, with the i7 winning by 2.8% (12463 versus 12110). PassMark single-thread tests show a 3.5% edge for the i7 (3461 versus 3340). The R20 multi-core and single-core tests both give the i7 a 3.5% advantage (6530 versus 6304, and 921 versus 889).

The i5-12450HX’s wins are concentrated in fewer tests but are equally distinct. Extended instructions show a 19.4% advantage for the i5 (13832 versus 11581). Cinebench R23 single-core goes to the i5 by 15.9% (2119 versus 1829). Data compression favors the i5 by 7.8% (219707 versus 203746). Random string sorting is a 3.5% win for the i5 (23306 versus 22522). The R23 multi-core test is the tightest of all, with the i5 winning by just 1.1% (11390 versus 11266.5). These results indicate that the i5’s architecture, despite fewer cores, handles certain instruction streams and compression workloads more efficiently. The i7’s higher core count and larger L3 cache give it the edge in most conventional benchmarks, but the i5’s per-core capabilities in R23 single-core and extended instructions make it a specialist in those areas.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The core and thread counts are the most visible split: 8 cores and 12 threads for the i5-12450HX versus 12 cores and 16 threads for the i7-1360P. Base clock speeds are close, with the i5 at 2.40 GHz and the i7 at 2.20 GHz, but boost clocks diverge significantly at 4.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP ratings show a 27W difference, with the i5 at 55W and the i7 at 28W. The L2 cache per core doubles from 1.25 MB on the i5 to 2 MB on the i7, while the L3 cache jumps from 12 MB shared to 18 MB shared. The process node is identical at 10 nm, but the die size is only listed for the i5 at 215 mm². Socket compatibility is impossible, with Intel BGA 1964 for the i5 and Intel BGA 1744 for the i7. PCIe generation differs, with the i5 supporting Gen 5 and the i7 supporting Gen 4, both with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are a clear differentiator: UHD Graphics 710 on the i5 versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the i7. The multiplier is unlocked on the i5 but locked on the i7. Release dates are separated by eight months, and the launch MSRP reflects the positioning, with the i5 at $284 and the i7 at $480. Memory support, memory bus width, ECC support, and market segment are identical. The part numbers also differ: SRLGJ for the i5 and SRMJ8 for the i7.