Intel Core i5-11500H vs Intel Xeon D-2733NT Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a clean sweep for the Intel Core i5-11500H across all six head-to-head Cinebench tests. The widest margin comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the i5-11500H scores 201 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 195, a 3.1% advantage. Every other head-to-head comparison lands at a 2.8% delta in favor of the mobile part, including the multi-core tests where the Xeon's two extra cores might have been expected to tip the balance.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-11500H posts 14,166 versus 13,775 for the Xeon D-2733NT. That 2.8% gap is consistent across R15 multi-core (1,427 vs. 1,388), R20 multi-core (5,949 vs. 5,785), and R20 single-core (839 vs. 816). The R23 single-core result shows 1,999 for the i5-11500H and 1,944 for the Xeon, again a 2.8% difference. The pattern is remarkably uniform: the i5-11500H leads by roughly three percent in every workload, regardless of thread count.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar story. The i5-11500H averages 4,187 points across all recorded tests, while the Xeon D-2733NT sits at 3,984. That places the i5-11500H 5.1% ahead in aggregate performance. Both processors land at the 57th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they occupy similar overall performance tiers despite the consistent head-to-head margins.

The nearest rival data provides additional context. The i5-11500H's average score sits just 0.6% above the Intel Core i9-9900 (4,163), and 0.7% below the Core i5-12500T (4,216). The Xeon D-2733NT, meanwhile, matches the Intel Xeon E-2336 exactly at 3,985, and edges the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G by 0.2%. These figures suggest both processors are firmly mid-pack performers, with the i5-11500H holding a small but measurable edge in every direct comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different Intel families and target different markets. The Core i5-11500H belongs to the Tiger Lake-H generation, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 190 mm². The Xeon D-2733NT is part of the Ice Lake-D line, also on 10 nm, though its die size is not recorded in the database. Both use the same per-core cache configuration: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache differs, with the i5-11500H carrying 12 MB shared against 15 MB shared for the Xeon.

Core counts favor the server part. The Xeon D-2733NT has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-11500H has 6 cores and 12 threads. Clock speeds reverse the advantage: the i5-11500H runs at a 2.40 GHz base and boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the Xeon D-2733NT starts at 2.10 GHz and reaches only 3.20 GHz. The thermal envelope tells a similar story, with the i5-11500H rated at 35 W TDP versus 80 W for the Xeon, though the database does not record cooler requirements.

Memory architecture splits them further. The i5-11500H uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Xeon D-2733NT employs quad-channel DDR4 at 85.3 GB/s. ECC memory support exists only on the Xeon, which is typical for its server/workstation positioning. PCIe connectivity also differs: the i5-11500H provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Xeon offers Gen 4 with 32 lanes.

The i5-11500H includes integrated UHD Graphics 750, whereas the Xeon D-2733NT has no integrated graphics recorded. The mobile chip uses an Intel BGA 1787 socket, and the server chip uses Intel BGA 2579. Both are production-active, with the i5-11500H released in May 2021 and the Xeon in February 2022. The i5-11500H carries a launch MSRP of $250; the Xeon's launch price is not recorded.

Neither processor supports an unlocked multiplier. The i5-11500H's part number is SRKT2, and the Xeon's is SRLCJ.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward choice for most users: the Intel Core i5-11500H wins every benchmark recorded, despite having fewer cores and a lower TDP. Its higher boost clock, 4.60 GHz against 3.20 GHz, appears to compensate for the core deficit in multi-threaded workloads. The six core, 12 thread configuration beats the eight core, 16 thread Xeon by 2.8% in every Cinebench test, which indicates the i5-11500H extracts more performance per core in these workloads.

The Xeon D-2733NT retains advantages that matter outside raw Cinebench scores. Its quad-channel memory with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, ECC support, and 32 PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it suitable for server environments where data integrity and expansion capacity are priorities. The i5-11500H's dual-channel 51.2 GB/s memory and 20 lanes suffice for a mobile platform but do not match the server part's throughput.

The 35 W TDP of the i5-11500H versus 80 W for the Xeon suggests the mobile chip is more power-efficient, though the database does not include power consumption measurements. The i5-11500H also brings integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic display scenarios.

The Xeon D-2733NT is the choice for systems requiring ECC memory, high memory bandwidth, or extensive PCIe expansion. The i5-11500H is the better pick for general computing performance, especially in single-threaded tasks, and for mobile or low-power deployments. The benchmark results do not favor the Xeon in any recorded test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-11500H scores 1,999, which is 2.8% higher than the Xeon D-2733NT's 1,944.

Q: Does the Xeon D-2733NT support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for the Xeon D-2733NT, while the Core i5-11500H does not support ECC.

Q: How do the multi-core scores compare in Cinebench R20?

A: The i5-11500H posts 5,949 versus 5,785 for the Xeon, a 2.8% advantage for the i5-11500H.

Q: What is the core count difference between the two chips?

A: The Xeon D-2733NT has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-11500H has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The i5-11500H averages 4,187 points, compared to 3,984 for the Xeon D-2733NT.

Q: Are both processors on the same manufacturing node?

A: Yes, both are built on Intel's 10 nm process, though the i5-11500H records a die size of 190 mm² while the Xeon's is not listed.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i5-11500H: Wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Its strengths are most pronounced in single-threaded performance, where the 4.60 GHz boost clock drives a 3.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core. The multi-core victories, though smaller at 2.8%, are consistent across R15, R20, and R23. The lower 35 W TDP makes it suitable for laptops and compact systems. Integrated UHD Graphics 750 adds display capability without a separate GPU. The 2.40 GHz base clock is higher than the Xeon's 2.10 GHz, supporting sustained performance in lighter workloads.

Intel Xeon D-2733NT: Wins on platform features rather than benchmark scores. The quad-channel memory bus delivers 85.3 GB/s, a 66.6% bandwidth advantage over the i5-11500H's 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory support provides error correction for data-critical workloads. The 32 PCIe Gen 4 lanes double the i5-11500H's 20 lanes, enabling more expansion devices. The 15 MB shared L3 cache exceeds the i5-11500H's 12 MB. Its 8 core, 16 thread configuration offers more parallel headroom, even if Cinebench results do not reflect an advantage. The 80 W TDP and server/workstation market segment indicate it is designed for always-on, rack-mounted duties rather than mobile use.