Intel Core i5-1145G7E vs Intel Xeon E-2224G Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1145G7E and the Intel Xeon E-2224G are both 4-core Intel processors, but they serve fundamentally different market segments: one is a low-power mobile chip, the other a workstation-oriented desktop part. The benchmark data shows a clear and consistent winner across all recorded Cinebench tests: the i5-1145G7E. Despite its lower base clock and lower TDP, the mobile Tiger Lake part outperforms the Coffee Lake Xeon in every single-core and multi-core workload measured. The Xeon E-2224G does hold advantages in other areas, notably PCIe lane count, ECC memory support, and a higher boost clock, but in raw rendering performance, the i5-1145G7E is decisively ahead.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are remarkably uniform. The Intel Core i5-1145G7E wins all six recorded benchmark comparisons, with the margin hovering consistently around 17.5 percent. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-1145G7E scores 757 against the Xeon E-2224G's 644, a 17.5 percent advantage. The single-core R15 result is similar: 106 versus 90, a 17.8 percent lead. This pattern repeats in every subsequent test generation. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the i5-1145G7E posts 3156 versus 2687, again a 17.5 percent gap, while the single-core test shows 445 against 379, a 17.4 percent difference. The most demanding workload, Cinebench R23, follows the same trajectory: the i5-1145G7E scores 7516 multi-core and 1061 single-core, compared to the Xeon's 6398 and 903, with the multi-core delta at 17.5 percent and single-core at 17.5 percent as well.

The consistency of these margins is notable. It indicates that the i5-1145G7E's architectural efficiency, not just a single workload quirk, drives the advantage. The Xeon E-2224G does have a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus 4.10 GHz, and a much higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, yet it still loses by roughly the same fraction in every test. This suggests the Tiger Lake architecture's IPC (instructions per clock) advantage, combined with the i5's hyper-threading (8 threads versus 4), is enough to overcome the raw clock speed deficit. The average benchmark score for the i5-1145G7E is 2174, compared to 2117 for the Xeon, a modest overall gap that reflects the Xeon's additional Geekbench results, where it scores 4299 multi-core and 1535 single-core. Those Geekbench numbers do not appear in the head-to-head table, but they help contextualize the two chips' overall database standings.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-1145G7E is the clear winner in every Cinebench rendering workload, both single-threaded and multi-threaded. Its 8 threads, enabled by hyper-threading, give it a structural advantage in multi-core tasks, allowing the 4 physical cores to process two threads each. The Xeon E-2224G, with only 4 threads, cannot match this throughput. For users running CPU-bound rendering, video encoding, or any workload that scales with thread count, the i5-1145G7E is the superior choice based on the recorded data.

The Xeon E-2224G, however, wins in areas not covered by Cinebench. It supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the i5-1145G7E, which is critical for error-sensitive server and workstation environments. It also provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, compared to only 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes on the i5-1145G7E. This makes the Xeon far more suitable for systems requiring multiple expansion cards, high-bandwidth storage controllers, or discrete GPUs. The Xeon also has a higher boost clock (4.70 GHz versus 4.10 GHz) and a higher base clock (3.50 GHz versus 1.50 GHz), which can benefit lightly threaded workloads that do not rely on the i5's architectural gains. Its integrated graphics, HD Graphics P630, is less capable than the i5's Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU, but the Xeon's market segment is server/workstation, where the iGPU is typically just for basic display output. The Xeon also has a recorded memory bandwidth figure of 42.7 GB/s, while the i5's bandwidth is not specified in the data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-1145G7E scores 1061, which is 17.5 percent ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2224G's 903.

Q: Does the Xeon E-2224G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon E-2224G supports ECC memory, while the i5-1145G7E does not.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does each processor provide?

A: The Xeon E-2224G provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, while the i5-1145G7E provides 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each chip?

A: The i5-1145G7E has an average benchmark score of 2174, while the Xeon E-2224G has an average score of 2117.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Xeon E-2224G has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to the i5-1145G7E's 4.10 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The i5-1145G7E has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Xeon E-2224G has a TDP of 71 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every key specification. The i5-1145G7E has 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2224G has 4. Base clocks are drastically different: 1.50 GHz for the i5 versus 3.50 GHz for the Xeon. Boost clocks also differ, with the Xeon reaching 4.70 GHz compared to the i5's 4.10 GHz. TDP is another major split: the i5 is rated at 28 watts, the Xeon at 71 watts. The socket types are incompatible: the i5 uses Intel BGA 1449, while the Xeon uses Intel Socket 1151. The i5's process node is 10 nm versus the Xeon's 14 nm. Die size also differs: 144 mm² for the i5, 126 mm² for the Xeon. Cache layouts are distinct: the i5 has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, while the Xeon has 64 KB L1 per core and 256 KB L2 per core. Both share 8 MB of L3 cache. Memory support varies, with the i5 supporting DDR4 and LPDDR4X, while the Xeon supports only DDR4. The Xeon has a specified memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s; the i5's is not listed. ECC memory is supported only on the Xeon. PCIe generation and lane counts differ: the i5 offers Gen 4 with 4 lanes, the Xeon offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are different as well: Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on the i5, HD Graphics P630 on the Xeon. The market segments are mobile versus server/workstation. The i5 was released in September 2020 and remains active in production, while the Xeon was released in May 2019 and is now end-of-life. Their launch MSRPs are $312 for the i5 and $213 for the Xeon.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two chips is substantial. The i5-1145G7E is built on Intel's Tiger Lake architecture, specifically the Tiger Lake-U codename, using a 10 nm process node. It belongs to the Core i5 generation with Willow Cove-U cores. The Xeon E-2224G, in contrast, is built on the Coffee Lake architecture, codename Coffee Lake-S WS, using a 14 nm process node. It belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series with Coffee Lake cores. The i5's newer process node and architecture deliver higher IPC, which explains its benchmark dominance despite lower clock speeds. The i5 also features hyper-threading, giving it 8 threads versus the Xeon's 4, and a larger per-core L2 cache (1.25 MB versus 256 KB) and larger L1 cache (80 KB versus 64 KB). The Xeon compensates with a higher base and boost clock, but the data shows that clock speed alone cannot overcome the i5's architectural and threading advantages. The Xeon's 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes reflect its workstation heritage, allowing for more expansion capability, while the i5's 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are typical for a mobile part. The i5's integrated Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU is a more modern and capable GPU than the Xeon's HD Graphics P630, but the Xeon's ECC memory support and server market positioning make it a different class of product.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for rendering workloads: the Intel Core i5-1145G7E is the faster processor. It wins every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, by margins of roughly 17.5 percent. Its 8 threads, newer 10 nm Tiger Lake architecture, and larger cache configuration give it a decisive edge over the Xeon E-2224G, which uses older 14 nm Coffee Lake cores and lacks hyper-threading. The i5 also achieves this performance at a much lower TDP of 28 watts, making it dramatically more power-efficient. Users who prioritize CPU rendering, encoding, or any multi-threaded application should choose the i5-1145G7E without hesitation.

The Xeon E-2224G is not without its merits, but they lie outside the Cinebench suite. It supports ECC memory, which is essential for data integrity in server and workstation environments. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes allow for far more expansion options, including multiple GPUs or high-speed storage controllers. Its higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz can benefit workloads that are latency-sensitive and lightly threaded. However, its production status is end-of-life, and it consumes 71 watts, more than double the i5's TDP. The Xeon is the right choice for a system that requires ECC memory, extensive PCIe expansion, and a workstation form factor, provided the user does not need maximum Cinebench performance. The i5-1145G7E is the right choice for nearly everything else, especially mobile or low-power systems where its 28-watt TDP and compact BGA socket are assets. Its 47th percentile ranking versus the Xeon's 46th percentile confirms that, on average, the i5 is slightly stronger across all benchmark categories recorded in the database.