Intel Core i5-11320H vs Intel Core i5-1335UE Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1335UE and Intel Core i5-11320H are both active mobile processors, but they target different priorities. The data shows a clear split: the 1335UE wins every benchmark comparison, while the 11320H counters with a higher TDP and more PCIe lanes. Benchmark results indicate the 1335UE is the faster CPU in raw compute, but the 11320H remains relevant for specific platform needs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 1335UE dominates the Cinebench suite across the board. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 1335UE scores 10052 against the 11320H's 9158, a 9.8% advantage. This pattern holds in single-core testing: the 1335UE posts 1419 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1293 for the 11320H, a 9.7% lead. The consistency is striking—every delta in the head-to-head data falls between 9.2% and 9.8%.

Looking at older Cinebench versions confirms the trend. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the 1335UE scores 4221 versus 3846, again a 9.8% margin. Single-core R20 shows 595 against 543, a 9.6% difference. The R15 results follow suit: multi-core 1013 versus 923 (9.8%) and single-core 142 versus 130 (9.2%). The 1335UE wins all six head-to-head matchups.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar story. The 1335UE averages 2907 across all tests, while the 11320H averages 2888. Both chips sit at the 51st percentile of all CPUs, placing them in the exact same performance tier overall. The 11320H's nearest rival list even includes the 1335UE with a -0.7% delta, showing how close their aggregate performance is despite the individual test wins.

The 1335UE's wins are not marginal in isolation but consistent across every workload. A 9.8% multi-core advantage in R23 translates to noticeably faster rendering and compilation times. Single-core gains near 10% also improve everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded application performance. The 11320H does have Geekbench scores in its data—5620 multi-core and 1592 single-core—but no comparable Geekbench results exist for the 1335UE in this pack, so no direct comparison is possible there.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from different Intel generations and designs. The 1335UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename, part of the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-U) generation. The 11320H uses Tiger Lake architecture with the Tiger Lake-H codename, from the Core 11th Gen series. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel's foundry, so the manufacturing process is identical.

Core counts differ significantly. The 1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the 11320H has 4 cores and 8 threads. The 1335UE's hybrid configuration likely explains its multi-core advantage—more physical cores can sustain parallel workloads even if individual core performance is similar. The 11320H's lower core count limits its multi-threaded ceiling.

Cache layouts share L1 and L2 sizes: both have 80 KB L1 per core and 1.25 MB L2 per core. The L3 cache diverges—the 1335UE has 12 MB shared, while the 11320H has 8 MB shared. That 4 MB extra L3 on the 1335UE helps with repeated data access and larger working sets. The 11320H does have a documented die size of 146.1 mm², while the 1335UE's die size is not listed in the pack.

Memory support differs. The 1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the 11320H is limited to DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The 11320H has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; no equivalent bandwidth figure is given for the 1335UE. The 11320H also has a part number (SRKSK) and a launch MSRP of $309, details absent for the 1335UE.

Integrated graphics vary. The 1335UE features Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units (80EU), while the 11320H has Iris XE with 96EU. The 11320H's GPU has more execution units, which may benefit lightly-threaded graphics tasks, though no GPU benchmarks are in the pack to quantify this.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1335UE wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 10052 in R23 multi-core versus 9158 for the 11320H, a 9.8% advantage. The R20 and R15 multi-core tests also show 9.8% leads for the 1335UE.

Q: Is the 11320H better at single-core tasks?

A: No. The 1335UE wins every single-core test in the head-to-head data. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 1335UE scores 1419 against 1293, a 9.7% margin. The R20 and R15 single-core tests show 9.6% and 9.2% leads respectively.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The 1335UE averages 2907 across all benchmarks, while the 11320H averages 2888. Both sit at the 51st percentile of all CPUs. The 11320H's nearest rival list includes the 1335UE with a -0.7% delta, indicating near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: Do they use the same process node?

A: Yes, both are built on Intel's 10 nm process. The architecture differs—the 1335UE uses Raptor Lake-U while the 11320H uses Tiger Lake-H—but the manufacturing node is the same.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The 1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the 11320H supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The 11320H has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; no bandwidth figure is available for the 1335UE.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The 1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, compared to 4 cores and 8 threads on the 11320H. This core advantage is the primary driver of the 1335UE's multi-core benchmark wins.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1335UE | Intel Core i5-11320H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 1300.00 MHz | 2500.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel BGA 1449 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-U | Tiger Lake-H |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-U) | Core 11th Gen |

| Die Size | Not listed | 146.1 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Iris XE 96EU |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $309 |

| Part Number | Not listed | SRKSK |

Where Each One Wins

The 1335UE wins every benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Its 9.8% lead in multi-core R23 and R20 tests makes it the clear choice for CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 10-core, 12-thread configuration provides the parallel throughput that the 4-core, 8-thread 11320H cannot match. Single-core wins of 9.2-9.7% also favor the 1335UE for everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light photo editing.

The 11320H's advantages are not in benchmark scores but in platform features. It offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only) versus 8 on the 1335UE, making it better suited for configurations with multiple NVMe drives or discrete GPUs that need more direct CPU connectivity. Its integrated graphics has 96EU versus 80EU on the 1335UE, which may provide better iGPU performance for display output or light gaming, though no GPU benchmarks are available to confirm. The 11320H also has a documented memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, useful for memory-intensive tasks if the system uses fast DDR4 modules.

The 11320H's higher TDP of 28 W versus 15 W suggests it can sustain higher clocks under load, but the benchmark data does not reflect this—the 1335UE wins all tests despite the lower TDP. The 11320H's higher base clock of 2500 MHz versus 1300 MHz does not translate into better real-world scores. For builders prioritizing raw compute, the 1335UE is the stronger option. For those needing more PCIe lanes or a higher-core-count iGPU, the 11320H has specific platform benefits.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-1335UE outperforms the Intel Core i5-11320H in every head-to-head benchmark. The 1335UE's 9.8% multi-core advantage and 9.2-9.7% single-core advantage make it the faster processor for both threaded and single-threaded workloads. Its 10 cores versus 4, 12 MB L3 versus 8 MB, and DDR5 support give it a generational edge that the 11320H cannot overcome.

The 11320H is not without merit. Its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes double the 1335UE's 8 lanes, making it the better choice for systems with multiple high-speed expansion devices. Its 96EU integrated graphics offers more execution units for iGPU-dependent tasks. The 11320H also has a launch MSRP of $309, a figure not stated for the 1335UE, which may factor into purchasing decisions.

Choose the 1335UE if you want the fastest CPU in this comparison. It wins all six head-to-head tests, offers more cores and cache, and supports newer DDR5 memory. Choose the 11320H only if your build specifically requires the extra PCIe lanes or the higher-EU integrated graphics. Both CPUs sit at the 51st percentile of all CPUs with average scores within 19 points of each other, so for general use, the 1335UE's benchmark superiority makes it the default recommendation. The 11320H remains a viable option for niche platform requirements, but the performance crown belongs to the 1335UE.