CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2324G and Intel Core i5-11300H are both 4-core Intel parts, but they target different worlds: one is a server/workstation chip, the other a mobile processor. Benchmark results show a clear split between Cinebench and Geekbench workloads. The Core i5-11300H wins all six Cinebench tests, with the Xeon E-2324G taking both Geekbench tests. The margins matter more than the win counts. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-11300H scores 9127 versus the Xeon’s 8797, a 3.6% edge. Similar 3.5-3.6% gaps appear across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single and multi-core runs. The Geekbench results flip the narrative. The Xeon E-2324G posts 5257 in Geekbench multi-core versus 4907 for the i5-11300H, a 7.1% lead. Single-core Geekbench is the biggest divergence: 2059 for the Xeon versus 1589 for the i5, a massive 29.6% advantage. This inconsistency suggests the two chips have very different performance characteristics depending on the benchmark’s workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench sweep by the Core i5-11300H is consistent but narrow. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5 scores 919 against 886 for the Xeon, a 3.6% difference. Single-core R15 shows 129 versus 125, a 3.1% gap. Moving to R20, the i5’s 3833 multi-core beats the Xeon’s 3694 by 3.6%, while single-core R20 is 540 versus 521, a 3.5% lead. R23 multi-core sees 9127 against 8797, again 3.6% apart. Single-core R23 is 1288 versus 1242, also 3.6%. The pattern is uniform: the i5-11300H is roughly 3.5% faster across all Cinebench versions and core counts. This consistency points to a fundamental throughput advantage in render-style workloads, likely tied to the i5’s 8 threads versus the Xeon’s 4 threads.

The Geekbench results tell a different story. The Xeon E-2324G wins Geekbench multi-core with 5257 against 4907, a 7.1% margin. That is a larger gap than any Cinebench win for the i5. Single-core Geekbench is where the Xeon dominates: 2059 versus 1589, a 29.6% blowout. This is the single biggest head-to-head delta in the data. The Xeon’s single-core score is not just higher; it is nearly a third faster. Relative to the field, the Xeon’s average benchmark score of 2823 sits near its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U at 2829 (0.2% higher) and the Intel Core i7-6800K at 2838 (0.5% higher). The i5-11300H’s average of 2792 is similarly clustered, with the Intel Core i5-8600K at 2807 (0.5% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G at 2774 (0.6% lower). Both chips land at the 51st percentile of all CPUs, meaning they are dead average in the overall database.

The deltaPct values in the head-to-head table reveal the asymmetry. For the six Cinebench tests, the i5’s win margins are all negative for the Xeon, ranging from -3.1% to -3.6%. For the two Geekbench tests, the Xeon’s win margins are positive, at +7.1% and +29.6%. The data shows no test where the two chips are close; every benchmark has a clear winner. The Xeon’s Geekbench single-core win is so large that it skews the overall picture. If a workload resembles Geekbench’s mix, the Xeon is the clear pick. If it resembles Cinebench’s rendering, the i5 wins consistently but by a modest amount.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-11300H wins in all Cinebench scenarios, which are heavily threaded render tests. Multi-core Cinebench R23, R20, and R15 all favor the i5 by about 3.6%. Single-core Cinebench also favors the i5, but by a slightly smaller margin (3.1-3.6%). This makes the i5 the better choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and any CPU-bound productivity task that uses multiple threads. The i5’s 8 threads versus 4 threads on the Xeon explain the consistent multi-core advantage. Even in single-core Cinebench, the i5’s higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz against the Xeon’s 4.60 GHz does not hurt it; the i5 still leads, likely due to architectural efficiency from the 10 nm Tiger Lake process versus the 14 nm Rocket Lake process.

The Intel Xeon E-2324G wins Geekbench, which is a more varied test mixing integer, floating-point, and memory workloads. The multi-core win of 7.1% is substantial, and the single-core win of 29.6% is decisive. For tasks like software compilation, spreadsheet calculations, or general desktop responsiveness, the Xeon’s Geekbench scores suggest superior per-core performance. The Xeon also has a higher base clock (3.10 GHz versus 2.60 GHz) and a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz versus 4.40 GHz), which contributes to its single-core dominance. The Xeon’s 65W TDP versus the i5’s 28W TDP also reflects a desktop-class design with more thermal headroom for sustained clocks.

Use-case split: if you are rendering frames or encoding video, the i5-11300H is the safer bet, with consistent 3.5%+ wins across Cinebench. If you are running mixed productivity or single-threaded applications, the Xeon E-2324G is clearly faster, especially in single-core Geekbench where it is 29.6% ahead. The Xeon’s ECC memory support is another factor; the i5 lacks ECC. For a workstation that needs error-correcting memory, the Xeon is the only option here. For a mobile or low-power build, the i5’s 28W TDP is far more manageable than the Xeon’s 65W.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different Intel architectures and process nodes. The Xeon E-2324G uses Rocket Lake (codename Rocket Lake-E), built on Intel’s 14 nm process. The Core i5-11300H uses Tiger Lake (codename Tiger Lake-H), built on the newer 10 nm process. The die sizes reflect this: the Xeon measures 276 mm², while the i5 is much smaller at 146.1 mm². The Xeon’s larger die on an older node suggests a more complex or power-hungry design, but the i5’s smaller die on a newer node delivers comparable multi-core performance with far lower TDP.

Core and thread counts differ. The Xeon has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the i5 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The i5’s Hyper-Threading doubles its thread count, which explains its Cinebench multi-core wins. Cache layouts also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 8 MB of shared L3. The L2 cache differs significantly: the Xeon has 512 KB per core, while the i5 has 1.25 MB per core. That is more than double the L2 per core on the i5, which helps with data reuse in threaded workloads. The Xeon’s smaller L2 may contribute to its lower Cinebench scores.

Memory support is similar: both use DDR4 with dual-channel buses and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Xeon supports ECC memory; the i5 does not. PCIe is identical: Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) for both. Integrated graphics differ: the Xeon has UHD Graphics P750, while the i5 has Iris XE 80EU. The i5’s Iris XE is a more capable integrated GPU for mobile use, though neither chip is meant for gaming without a discrete GPU. The Xeon’s socket is Intel Socket 1200, while the i5 uses Intel BGA 1449 (soldered). The Xeon is a server/workstation part with a release date of September 2021; the i5 is a mobile part released in January 2021. The Xeon’s launch MSRP is $209; the i5’s is $309.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload. Choose the Intel Xeon E-2324G if you prioritize single-core performance or need ECC memory. Its 29.6% lead in Geekbench single-core over the i5 is the largest performance gap in this comparison. The 7.1% Geekbench multi-core win also shows it handles mixed workloads well. The Xeon’s 65W TDP is fine for a desktop workstation, and its Socket 1200 allows for a standard motherboard. It also has a lower launch MSRP at $209.

Choose the Intel Core i5-11300H if you are doing heavy multi-threaded rendering. Its wins in all Cinebench tests (3.1-3.6% margins) are consistent across R15, R20, and R23. The 8 threads give it a real advantage in render workloads. The 28W TDP makes it viable for compact or mobile systems, though the BGA 1449 socket means it is soldered and not upgradeable. The i5 also has more L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 512 KB) and a newer 10 nm process. The higher launch MSRP of $309 reflects its mobile positioning with integrated Iris XE graphics.

Neither chip is a clear overall winner. Both sit at the 51st percentile of all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are close: 2823 for the Xeon versus 2792 for the i5. The Xeon’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U (0.2% higher average score), while the i5’s nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 (0.1% higher). The data shows two chips with similar overall performance but opposite strengths. For a workstation that runs single-threaded applications or needs ECC, the Xeon is the pick. For a render box or mobile workstation, the i5 is the pick.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in single-core Geekbench?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G scores 2059 in Geekbench single-core, which is 29.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-11300H’s 1589.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-11300H win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the i5 wins all six Cinebench tests: R15 multi-core (919 vs 886), R15 single-core (129 vs 125), R20 multi-core (3833 vs 3694), R20 single-core (540 vs 521), R23 multi-core (9127 vs 8797), and R23 single-core (1288 vs 1242).

Q: What is the thread count difference?

A: The Xeon E-2324G has 4 threads, while the Core i5-11300H has 8 threads. Both have 4 cores.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2324G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-11300H does not.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The Xeon E-2324G uses Intel’s 14 nm process, while the Core i5-11300H uses Intel’s 10 nm process.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Xeon E-2324G has an average benchmark score of 2823, and the Core i5-11300H has 2792. Both are at the 51st percentile of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2324G | Intel Core i5-11300H |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Xeon E-2300 series | Core 11th Gen |

| Cores | 4 | 4 |

| Threads | 4 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.10 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel BGA 1449 |

| Architecture | Rocket Lake | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Rocket Lake-E | Tiger Lake-H |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 276 mm² | 146.1 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 | Iris XE 80EU |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2021-09-07 | 2021-01-10 |

| Launch MSRP | $209 | $309 |

| Part Number | SRKN7 | SRKH6 |