Intel Core i5-11300H vs Intel Xeon D-1567 Comparison

# Intel Core i5-11300H vs Intel Xeon D-1567

The Intel Core i5-11300H and Intel Xeon D-1567 are both active Intel processors, but they target completely different worlds. The Core i5-11300H is a 4-core, 8-thread Tiger Lake-H mobile chip with a 28 W TDP, while the Xeon D-1567 is a 12-core, 24-thread Broadwell-DE server/workstation part with a 65 W TDP. The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: the Xeon D-1567 wins every single head-to-head Cinebench test, by margins between 4.7% and 5.1%. However, both processors sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs, with nearly identical average benchmark scores — 2792 for the Core i5 versus 2770 for the Xeon. This is a story of two very different designs converging on similar overall performance, but with very different strengths.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the Intel Xeon D-1567 is the faster processor in every measured Cinebench workload. It beats the Core i5-11300H by 4.7% to 5.1% across single-core and multi-core tests, from Cinebench R15 through R23. If raw rendering performance is the only criterion, the Xeon is the pick.

But the choice is not that simple. The Core i5-11300H is a mobile chip with a 28 W TDP and integrated Iris XE 80EU graphics, making it suitable for laptops and compact systems where power and space are limited. The Xeon D-1567 is a server/workstation processor with a 65 W TDP, ECC memory support, and no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

The Core i5 also benefits from a much newer architecture (Tiger Lake, 10 nm) compared to the Xeon’s Broadwell (14 nm) design. The Core i5 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Xeon uses PCIe Gen 3 with 24 lanes. The Core i5 has a higher boost clock (4.40 GHz versus 2.70 GHz) and a lower base clock (2.60 GHz versus 2.10 GHz). The Xeon counters with three times the cores and threads, which matters in heavily threaded workloads beyond the tested Cinebench suite.

Pick the Core i5-11300H if you need a balanced mobile processor with integrated graphics, modern PCIe Gen 4, and DDR4 memory support in a low-power package. Pick the Xeon D-1567 if you need ECC memory, more cores for server virtualization or multi-threaded compute, and are willing to accept slower single-thread performance and an older platform.

Architecture Differences

The Core i5-11300H uses Intel’s Tiger Lake architecture, specifically Tiger Lake-H, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. Its die size is 146.1 mm². The Xeon D-1567 uses the Broadwell architecture, specifically Broadwell-DE, on a 14 nm process, with a die size of 246 mm² and 3,200 million transistors.

The Core i5 has 4 cores and 8 threads, with an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon has 12 cores and 24 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 1.5 MB of L3 cache per core. The Xeon’s total L3 cache scales with core count, whereas the Core i5 uses a shared pool.

Memory support differs significantly. The Core i5 supports DDR4 only, in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and no ECC support. The Xeon supports both DDR3 and DDR4, also dual-channel, with ECC memory enabled. The Core i5 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Xeon offers PCIe Gen 3 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

The Core i5 includes integrated Iris XE 80EU graphics; the Xeon has no integrated graphics. The Core i5 is a mobile segment part with a 28 W TDP, released in January 2021 with a launch MSRP of $309. The Xeon is a server/workstation part with a 65 W TDP, released in February 2016 with a launch MSRP of 1199. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1567 wins every single-core Cinebench test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Xeon scores 1352 versus the Core i5-11300H’s 1288, a 4.7% lead. In R20 single-core, the Xeon scores 567 versus 540 (4.8% lead), and in R15 single-core, 136 versus 129 (5.1% lead).

Q: Does the Core i5-11300H have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The Core i5-11300H includes Iris XE 80EU integrated graphics. The Xeon D-1567 has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for video output.

Q: Can the Xeon D-1567 use ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Xeon D-1567 supports ECC memory and accepts both DDR3 and DDR4 in dual-channel configuration. The Core i5-11300H does not support ECC and only supports DDR4.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Xeon D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads, three times the Core i5-11300H’s 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the Xeon a significant advantage in workloads that scale with core count.

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The Core i5-11300H has an average benchmark score of 2792, while the Xeon D-1567 averages 2770. Both sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs. Their nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-8600K (2807, 0.5% above the Core i5) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G (2774, 0.2% below the Xeon).

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Core i5-11300H has a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for mobile devices. The Xeon D-1567 has a 65 W TDP, indicating a higher power draw for server/workstation use.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification. The Core i5-11300H has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1567 has 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 2.60 GHz for the Core i5 and 2.10 GHz for the Xeon; boost clocks are 4.40 GHz and 2.70 GHz, respectively. TDP is 28 W versus 65 W.

The Core i5 uses an Intel BGA 1449 socket, while the Xeon uses Intel BGA 1667. The Core i5 is built on a 10 nm process with a 146.1 mm² die; the Xeon uses a 14 nm process with a 246 mm² die and 3,200 million transistors. Cache layouts differ: the Core i5 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3; the Xeon has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 1.5 MB L3 per core.

Memory support: the Core i5 supports DDR4 only, dual-channel, with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC. The Xeon supports DDR3 and DDR4, dual-channel, with ECC enabled and no listed bandwidth. PCIe: the Core i5 offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes; the Xeon offers Gen 3 with 24 lanes. The Core i5 has Iris XE 80EU integrated graphics; the Xeon has none. Market segments are Mobile for the Core i5 and Server/Workstation for the Xeon. Release dates are January 2021 for the Core i5 and February 2016 for the Xeon. Part numbers are SRKH6 and SR2M3, respectively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data shows a clean sweep for the Xeon D-1567. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon scores 965 against the Core i5’s 919, a 4.8% advantage. In R15 single-core, the Xeon leads 136 to 129, a 5.1% margin — the largest gap in any test.

Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern. The Xeon wins multicore with 4022 versus 3833 (4.7% lead) and single-core with 567 versus 540 (4.8% lead). In Cinebench R23, the Xeon again takes both: multicore 9578 versus 9127 (4.7% lead) and single-core 1352 versus 1288 (4.7% lead).

The consistency is notable. Across all six tests, the Xeon’s margin stays between 4.7% and 5.1%, never exceeding that narrow band. This suggests the Xeon’s advantage is uniform across the Cinebench suite, regardless of core count scaling. The Core i5’s higher boost clock (4.40 GHz versus 2.70 GHz) does not compensate for the Xeon’s extra cores in multicore tests, nor does it overcome the Xeon’s slight edge in single-core tests.

Interestingly, the Core i5-11300H also has Geekbench scores (4907 multicore, 1589 single-core) that are not matched by any Geekbench result for the Xeon in the data. The Xeon D-1567 has no listed Geekbench scores, so those cannot be compared directly.

Where Each One Wins

The Xeon D-1567 wins every benchmark in the head-to-head set, so its strengths are clear: it is faster in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multicore, by roughly 5%. For users running Cinebench or similar rendering workloads, the Xeon is the better performer.

The Core i5-11300H has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head data, but it has structural advantages that matter outside Cinebench. It offers integrated Iris XE 80EU graphics, enabling systems without a discrete GPU. It supports PCIe Gen 4, doubling the per-lane bandwidth of the Xeon’s PCIe Gen 3. It has a lower TDP of 28 W, making it viable for thin laptops and small-form-factor designs. Its launch MSRP of $309 is substantially lower than the Xeon’s 1199, though pricing is not a performance metric.

The Xeon D-1567 wins in core count, thread count, and ECC memory support. Its 12 cores and 24 threads make it the better choice for server virtualization, multi-VM hosting, or heavily threaded compute tasks that extend beyond the Cinebench suite. ECC memory support is critical for data integrity in server environments. The Xeon also supports DDR3 in addition to DDR4, offering flexibility in memory selection.

In practical terms: choose the Core i5-11300H for a mobile workstation or compact PC where integrated graphics, low power draw, and modern PCIe Gen 4 matter. Choose the Xeon D-1567 for a server or workstation where ECC memory, 24 threads, and consistent Cinebench leadership are priorities. The data shows the Xeon is the faster chip in every measured test, but the Core i5’s feature set serves a different use case entirely.