Intel Core i5-11260H vs Intel Core i7-9700KF Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-11260H

CORE STATE Tiger Lake-H
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Tiger Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-9700KF

CORE STATE Coffee Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 95W
ARCHITECTURE Coffee Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,300
1,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
183
172
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,420
5,082
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
764
717
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,905
12,100
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,821
1,708
geekbench_multicore
5,780
7,620
geekbench_singlecore
1,595
1,681

Analysis: Intel Core i5-11260H vs Intel Core i7-9700KF

The Intel Core i7-9700KF and Intel Core i5-11260H represent two very different Intel design philosophies: a desktop Coffee Lake part versus a mobile Tiger Lake-H chip. The benchmark data shows a fascinating split, with the mobile part dominating Cinebench while the desktop chip takes Geekbench by a wide margin. Both processors land at the 56th percentile among all CPUs, yet their average benchmark scores tell slightly different stories: the i7-9700KF averages 3787, while the i5-11260H sits at 3721. This places the desktop chip 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-8086K, while the mobile chip matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE at -0.3% and trails the Intel Xeon Silver 4116 by the same margin. The i5-11260H also sits 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980HK, a notable result for a lower-tier mobile processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are emphatically one-sided. The Intel Core i5-11260H wins all six Cinebench tests, and it does so with remarkable consistency. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the mobile chip scores 1300 against 1219 for the i7-9700KF, a 6.2% advantage. The single-core R15 test follows the same pattern: 183 for the i5-11260H versus 172, again a 6% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-11260H posts 5420 multicore and 764 single-core, compared to 5082 and 717 for the i7-9700KF. The deltas remain locked at 6.2% for both metrics. Cinebench R23 continues the trend with the i5-11260H scoring 12905 multicore and 1821 single-core, while the i7-9700KF manages 12100 and 1708 respectively. The consistency of the 6.2% delta across every Cinebench generation suggests a fundamental architectural advantage for Tiger Lake in this workload, not a test-specific quirk.

The Geekbench results flip the script entirely. Here, the Intel Core i7-9700KF asserts its dominance with a 31.8% lead in multicore performance: 7620 versus 5780. That is a massive margin, far exceeding any of the Cinebench deltas. The single-core Geekbench test is closer, with the i7-9700KF winning 1681 to 1595, a 5.4% advantage. This divergence between benchmark suites is striking. In Cinebench, the i5-11260H leads by roughly 6% across the board; in Geekbench, the i7-9700KF leads by over 30% in multicore and over 5% in single-core. The data suggests that the two processors excel in different types of workloads, and the winner depends heavily on the specific application being used.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-9700KF has an average benchmark score of 3787, compared to 3721 for the Intel Core i5-11260H. The i7-9700KF sits 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, while the i5-11260H is 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-11260H wins both Cinebench R23 tests. It scores 12905 in multicore versus 12100 for the i7-9700KF, and 1821 in single-core versus 1708, with a 6.2% delta in both cases.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two chips?

A: The largest delta is in Geekbench multicore, where the Intel Core i7-9700KF leads by 31.8%, scoring 7620 against 5780 for the i5-11260H.

Q: Does the i5-11260H win any single-core tests?

A: Yes, the i5-11260H wins all single-core Cinebench tests: R15 (183 vs 172), R20 (764 vs 717), and R23 (1821 vs 1708), each by approximately 6%. However, it loses Geekbench single-core to the i7-9700KF (1595 vs 1681).

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-9700KF has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is higher than the 4.40 GHz boost clock of the Intel Core i5-11260H.

Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i5-11260H wins 6 out of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Core i7-9700KF wins 2. The i5-11260H wins all Cinebench tests, and the i7-9700KF wins both Geekbench tests.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-11260H is the clear winner for Cinebench-oriented workloads. Its consistent 6.2% advantage across R15, R20, and R23, in both multicore and single-core tests, indicates a processor that handles rendering and 3D animation tasks with greater efficiency. The data points to a chip that is well-suited for content creation applications that rely on Cinebench-style rendering engines. The i5-11260H also holds its own in single-core performance, winning all three Cinebench single-core tests, which suggests it can handle lightly-threaded tasks like everyday productivity and general responsiveness with ease.

The Intel Core i7-9700KF is the champion of Geekbench, and its 31.8% multicore lead is a decisive statement. This suggests the desktop chip is better suited for workloads that Geekbench measures, which tend to reflect real-world applications like web browsing, image processing, and file compression. The i7-9700KF also wins Geekbench single-core by 5.4%, further solidifying its position for general-purpose computing tasks. For users who prioritize the specific mix of workloads represented by Geekbench, the i7-9700KF is the stronger performer, despite losing the Cinebench sweep to its mobile rival.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-9700KF has 8 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-11260H has 6 cores and 12 threads. The desktop chip runs at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boosts to 4.90 GHz, whereas the mobile chip operates at 2.10 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The i7-9700KF has a TDP of 95 watts, compared to just 35 watts for the i5-11260H. The socket differs as well: the i7-9700KF uses Intel Socket 1151, while the i5-11260H uses Intel BGA 1787, reflecting its soldered mobile design. The i7-9700KF is an end-of-life product released on 2019-01-07, while the i5-11260H is active and was released on 2021-05-10. The i7-9700KF has an unlocked multiplier, but the i5-11260H does not. The i5-11260H includes integrated UHD Graphics, while the i7-9700KF has no integrated graphics. The i7-9700KF has a launch MSRP of $374, while the i5-11260H has a launch MSRP of $250. The i5-11260H offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the i7-9700KF provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Memory bandwidth is also higher on the mobile chip: 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is substantial. The Intel Core i7-9700KF is built on Coffee Lake, a 14 nm process, while the Intel Core i5-11260H uses the newer Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm node. The die sizes are close, at 180.3 mm² for the i7-9700KF and 190 mm² for the i5-11260H, but the cache layouts differ significantly. The i7-9700KF has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, while the i5-11260H has 80 KB of L1 and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core. Both share 12 MB of L3 cache, but the mobile chip’s larger per-core L2 cache is a key architectural advantage. The i5-11260H also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, a generational leap over the i7-9700KF’s PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The i7-9700KF is a desktop part with a 95-watt TDP and no integrated graphics, while the i5-11260H is a mobile part with a 35-watt TDP and UHD Graphics onboard. The i5-11260H’s higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s further underscores its more modern design. The i7-9700KF belongs to the Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) generation, while the i5-11260H is part of the Core i5 (Tiger Lake-H) lineup. These architectural differences explain the benchmark split: the newer 10 nm Tiger Lake design excels in Cinebench, while the older 14 nm Coffee Lake chip with more physical cores dominates Geekbench multicore.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-11260H
i7-9700KF
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
8 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.1
3.6 +71.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.4
4.9 +11.4%
Frequency (GHz)
2.1
3.6 +71.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.4
4.9 +11.4%
Multiplier
21
36 +71.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
95 +171.4%
Architecture
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Coffee Lake
Codename
Tiger Lake-H
Coffee Lake
Generation
Core i5 (Tiger Lake-H)
Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
Process Size
10 nm
14 nm
Die Size
190 mm²
180.3 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
42.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 1787
Intel Socket 1151
Chipsets
QM580, HM570, WM590
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$250
$374
Part Number
SRKT0
SRG16SRFAC
Package
FC-BGA16F
FC-LGA14C
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i5-11260H Details View Core i7-9700KF Details