Intel Core i5-110 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Comparison

Intel Core i5-110 (Desktop) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (Mobile) is a comparison of two very different Intel designs. The i5-110 is a 6-core desktop part from the Comet Lake generation, while the Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core mobile processor from the newer Panther Lake family. The database contains a full set of benchmark results for the Ultra 7 366H, but the i5-110 has no recorded scores, so this analysis relies on the architectural and specification differences between them, alongside the Ultra 7's performance relative to its own peers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data provides no direct head-to-head benchmark scores between the Intel Core i5-110 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H. The i5-110 has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of zero, meaning the database holds no measurable performance results for this desktop chip. Consequently, there are no wins to attribute to either side in a direct comparison. The only benchmark data available belongs to the Ultra 7 366H, which shows a strong showing in the database's rankings.

The Ultra 7 366H holds a percentile rank of 87 among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 41,263. For context, this places it in a tight group of rivals. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41,215, a delta of 0.1 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41,208, also 0.1 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a high-end desktop part, scores 41,376, which is 0.3 percent ahead of the 366H. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40,967, sitting 0.7 percent behind.

Since the i5-110 lacks any benchmark scores, a quantitative head-to-head section must focus on the architectural and feature gaps that would determine performance. The Ultra 7 366H delivers 16 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-110 offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This core count disparity suggests a substantial advantage for the Ultra 7 in multi-threaded workloads, though direct scores are absent. The i5-110's 12 threads come from hyper-threading on 6 physical cores, a common configuration for its generation, but the Ultra 7's 16 physical cores provide a raw throughput advantage that the data cannot quantify but the specifications clearly indicate.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores for the i5-110, the analysis of each processor's strengths must be derived from the specification sheet in the database. The i5-110 is a desktop processor with a 65 TDP, designed for stationary systems with active cooling. Its base clock of 2.90 and boost clock of 4.30 are lower than the Ultra 7's boost clock of 4.80, but the i5-110's higher base clock suggests it can sustain a consistent frequency at its given power envelope. The i5-110 uses DDR4 memory with dual-channel support and a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, which is a mature and stable platform for desktop builds.

The Ultra 7 366H, in contrast, is a mobile processor with a 25 TDP, targeting laptops and compact devices. Its base clock of 2.00 is lower, but the boost clock reaches 4.80, indicating a design that prioritizes short bursts of high performance while managing thermals. The Ultra 7 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a dual-channel bus and a much higher memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This memory advantage, combined with 16 cores, makes the Ultra 7 the clear choice for memory-intensive and multi-core tasks, based on the data. The i5-110's strengths lie in its desktop form factor and lower power consumption relative to many desktop chips, though the database does not provide comparative scores to quantify this.

The Ultra 7's benchmark results show specific strengths in various workload types. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28,477 in multi-core and 4,020 in single-core, indicating a balanced performance profile. In PassMark tests, it scores 103,615 in floating point math, 83,695 in integer math, and 334,29 in multithread, all of which point to strong computational capability. The i5-110 has no such data, so its wins are purely theoretical based on its desktop platform's sustained performance potential.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant. The i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process node, with the codename Comet Lake. It is a desktop part from the Core i5 generation, and its L1 cache is 64 KB per core, L2 cache is 256 KB per core, and L3 cache is 12 MB shared. The i5-110 integrates UHD Graphics 630, supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and uses a Intel Socket 1200. Its release date was September 10, 2025, and it has a launch MSRP of $200.

The Ultra 7 366H uses the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node, with the codename Panther Lake. It is a mobile part from the Ultra 7 generation, and its L1 cache is 192 KB per core, L2 cache is 2.5 MB per core, and L3 cache is 18 MB shared. The Ultra 7 integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics, supports PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only), and uses a Intel BGA 2540 socket. Its release date was January 4, 2026, and it has no recorded launch MSRP.

The process node difference from 14 nm to 3 nm is a major architectural leap, indicating the Ultra 7 is built on a much more advanced manufacturing process. The cache hierarchy also differs, with the Ultra 7 offering larger per-core L1 and L2 caches and a larger shared L3 cache. The i5-110's 12 MB L3 cache is smaller than the Ultra 7's 18 MB. Memory support diverges with the i5-110 using DDR4 and the Ultra 7 using DDR5 and LPDDR5X, which contributes to the Ultra 7's higher memory bandwidth. PCIe generation also differs, with the i5-110 on Gen 3 and the Ultra 7 on Gen 5, though the Ultra 7 has fewer lanes at 12 compared to 16.

Both processors have ECC memory support set to false, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning the Ultra 7 does not use hyper-threading but relies on more physical cores. The i5-110's base clock is 2.90 GHz, which is higher than the Ultra 7's 2.00 GHz, but the Ultra 7's boost clock of 4.80 GHz exceeds the i5-110's 4.30 GHz. These architectural differences clearly favor the Ultra 7 in terms of modern features and raw core count, while the i5-110 retains a desktop-oriented design with a higher base frequency.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the Intel Core i5-110 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H?

A: The i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Ultra 7 366H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the i5-110's boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The i5-110 supports DDR4 memory, while the Ultra 7 366H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The i5-110 has a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the Ultra 7 366H has a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The i5-110 is built on a 14 nm process node, while the Ultra 7 366H is built on a 3 nm process node.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The i5-110 has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Ultra 7 366H has a TDP of 25 watts.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear divide between these two processors, though the lack of i5-110 benchmarks limits a direct performance verdict. The Ultra 7 366H is the only one with benchmark scores, and it sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 41,263. This places it in a competitive position against similar mobile parts, slightly ahead of the Core Ultra 7 356H and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X. The i5-110 has no scores, so it cannot be ranked.

Based on specifications, the Ultra 7 366H is the superior processor for multi-core and memory-intensive tasks. Its 16 cores, 18 MB L3 cache, 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 3 nm process node all point to a modern, high-performance design. The i5-110, with its 6 cores, 12 MB L3 cache, 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 14 nm process node, is a more dated desktop part, though its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz and 65 TDP suggest it can sustain moderate workloads.

For a user building a desktop system with a focus on stable, single-threaded performance at a fixed power envelope, the i5-110 offers a straightforward option. For a user needing a mobile processor with high multi-threaded throughput, modern memory support, and advanced graphics, the Ultra 7 366H is the data-supported choice. The i5-110 has a launch MSRP of $200, while the Ultra 7 366H has no listed launch price, so cost comparisons are not possible from the database. The verdict, strictly from the data, favors the Ultra 7 366H for overall capability, but the i5-110 remains a viable desktop chip for its intended segment.