Intel Core i5-110 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H holds the only recorded benchmark data in this comparison, with a full suite of scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests. The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark results in the database, so every measurable performance comparison defaults to the Ultra 7 356H's results.

The Core Ultra 7 356H posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18395 and a single-core score of 2040. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 12153 multicore and 1715 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3055 multicore and 303 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Passmark results reinforce the multicore strength. The multithread score of 33978 and integer math score of 83111 indicate substantial parallel throughput. Floating point math reaches 103128, and extended instructions score 27898. Data compression hits 336177, while data encryption records 26345. Random string sorting produces 40990, and find prime numbers scores 327. Physics testing yields 2895, and single-thread performance measures 4072.

Because the i5-110 has no benchmark entries, the database shows zero wins for it and zero wins for the Ultra 7 356H in head-to-head terms. The available data permits only one-sided analysis. The Ultra 7 356H's average benchmark score of 41215 places it in close competition with several rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits at 41208 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41263 with a -0.1% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X reaches 41376 with a -0.4% delta, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H records 40967 with a 0.6% delta. These margins, all within 0.6%, indicate the Ultra 7 356H performs essentially on par with its nearest competitors in aggregate workload results.

The i5-110, without any recorded scores, cannot be positioned against these figures. Its 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database suggests a mid-pack standing, but no specific measurement exists to quantify its performance relative to the Ultra 7 356H.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 356H wins every measurable category by default. Its Cinebench scores show strong scaling from R15 through R23, with the multicore R23 result of 18395 representing the highest recorded multicore figure across the Cinebench suite. Single-core results also improve across generations, from 303 in R15 to 2040 in R23.

Passmark data reveals specific strengths. The data compression score of 336177 dwarfs other integer-oriented tasks, suggesting the processor handles compression workloads particularly well. Floating point math at 103128 nearly doubles the integer math result of 83111, indicating robust FP throughput. Extended instructions at 27898 show capable SIMD and specialized instruction execution. Random string sorting at 40990 reflects solid memory and cache handling for data manipulation tasks.

The single-thread score of 4072, combined with a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 2040, places the Ultra 7 356H in a competitive position for lightly threaded applications. The 4.70 GHz boost clock supports this single-thread capability, though the base clock sits at 1.90 GHz.

The i5-110 wins no benchmark categories because no data exists for it. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, paired with a 4.30 GHz boost clock, suggest it can handle typical desktop workloads, but the database records no measurements to confirm specific strengths. The 65 W TDP and desktop market segment indicate a conventional mainstream processor, while the Ultra 7 356H's 25 W TDP and mobile segment point to efficiency-oriented design.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different architectural eras. The Intel Core i5-110 uses Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H uses Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node, also fabricated by Intel. The process node difference, from 14 nm to 3 nm, represents a substantial generational leap in transistor density and power efficiency.

Core counts differ significantly. The i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 356H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Ultra 7 356H's thread count equals its core count, indicating no hyperthreading on its cores, whereas the i5-110 doubles its thread count through hyperthreading. Despite fewer cores, the i5-110's 12 threads approach the Ultra 7 356H's 16 threads, though the newer architecture likely provides higher per-thread performance.

Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. The i5-110 provides 64 KB L1 cache per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Ultra 7 356H offers 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The L2 cache difference is particularly pronounced, with the Ultra 7 356H providing nearly ten times more L2 per core, which benefits working sets that fit in L2.

Clock speeds show different design priorities. The i5-110 has a 2.90 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost. The Ultra 7 356H has a 1.90 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. The lower base clock on the Ultra 7 356H aligns with its 25 W TDP, while the higher boost clock enables burst performance. The i5-110's 65 W TDP allows sustained high clocks but consumes more power.

Memory support reflects generational progress. The i5-110 supports DDR4 with dual-channel configuration and 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Ultra 7 356H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, nearly three times the i5-110's bandwidth. This memory bandwidth advantage directly benefits the Ultra 7 356H's data-heavy workloads.

PCIe connectivity also advances. The i5-110 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 356H uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe standard provides substantially higher per-lane bandwidth, though the Ultra 7 356H offers fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differ by generation. The i5-110 includes UHD Graphics 630, while the Ultra 7 356H includes Intel Xe3 Graphics. The Xe3 architecture represents a major upgrade over the older UHD graphics, though no specific graphics benchmarks appear in the database.

Socket and packaging separate the two. The i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200, a desktop platform. The Ultra 7 356H uses Intel BGA 2540, a mobile soldered package. This makes the i5-110 upgradable and serviceable, while the Ultra 7 356H is fixed to its motherboard.

Release dates differ notably. The i5-110 has a release date of September 10, 2025. The Ultra 7 356H has a release date of January 4, 2026. The i5-110's launch MSRP is $200, while the Ultra 7 356H has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core i5-110 supports DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H boosts to 4.70 GHz, while the Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The i5-110 has a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz compared to 1.90 GHz for the Ultra 7 356H.

Q: Which processor uses a newer manufacturing process?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H uses a 3 nm process node with Panther Lake architecture, while the Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process node with Comet Lake architecture.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H has a 25 W TDP, while the Core i5-110 has a 65 W TDP. The lower TDP for the Ultra 7 356H reflects its mobile design.

Q: How does the Ultra 7 356H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 7 356H has an average benchmark score of 41215. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41208 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41263 with a -0.1% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376 with a -0.4% delta, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40967 with a 0.6% delta.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-110 | Intel Core Ultra 7 356H |

|----------------|-------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Comet Lake | Panther Lake |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | September 10, 2025 | January 4, 2026 |

| Launch MSRP | $200 | None recorded |

| Part Number | SA35X | SA4RGQ9EU |

The specification table shows the Core Ultra 7 356H as the newer, more advanced processor in nearly every category except base clock, socket type, and market segment. The i5-110 maintains a higher base clock and desktop form factor with socketed installation, while the Ultra 7 356H uses a mobile BGA package with a lower base clock but higher boost clock and substantially more cache per core. The 3 nm process node versus 14 nm represents the largest architectural gap, enabling the Ultra 7 356H to deliver 16 cores within a 25 W TDP envelope while the i5-110 requires 65 W for 6 cores. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the Ultra 7 356H, despite fewer lanes, provides modern connectivity. The i5-110's DDR4 support and 42.7 GB/s bandwidth limit its memory-bound performance compared to the Ultra 7 356H's 115.2 GB/s capability.