Intel Core i5-110 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurement between the Intel Core i5-110 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. No comparative test results are recorded for these two processors in the same workload. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, however, carries a full set of standalone benchmark scores, while the Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This absence of data for the i5-110 means any direct comparison must rely on the architectural specifications and the performance profile of the Ultra 7 as measured against its nearest rivals.

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41913 and a single-core score of 5917. In Cinebench R20, it scores 17603 multi-core and 2485 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 run yields 4224 multi-core and 596 single-core. These results place the chip in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 61834. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900KF, scores 61841, a delta of 0 percent. The Core i9-13900K trails by 0.1 percent at 61766, and the Core i9-13900T is 0.2 percent behind at 61723. The Intel Xeon 636 sits 0.8 percent lower at 61360. The data shows the Ultra 7 270HX Plus effectively matches the flagship Core i9-13900 series in aggregate performance, despite being a mobile-part designation.

In PassMark workloads, the Ultra 7 270HX Plus delivers a multi-thread score of 48270 and a single-thread score of 4764. Data compression reaches 493179, while data encryption hits 37813. Extended instructions score 39283, and prime number finding scores 482. Floating point math lands at 163567, integer math at 122449, physics at 3843, and random string sorting at 60020. These numbers establish a baseline for the Ultra 7, but without any corresponding scores for the Core i5-110, no win-loss tally can be derived. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both win counters sit at zero.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation between these two processors. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a high-performance part: 20 cores, 20 threads, a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and a 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 61834 places it alongside the Core i9-13900K, Core i9-13900KF, and Core i9-13900T, all within 0.2 percent of each other. The Core i5-110, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 0. The i5-110 offers 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP, but the lack of measured data means the database cannot quantify its performance relative to the Ultra 7.

For a user selecting strictly from recorded data, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the only option with verified performance metrics. It delivers multi-threaded throughput in the same range as the Core i9-13900KF, the Core i9-13900K, and the Core i9-13900T, which are all desktop flagship parts. The Core i5-110 carries a 50th percentile score, indicating mid-pack positioning among all CPUs, but no specific workload results support any claim about its speed. The Ultra 7 also benefits from a smaller process node, a larger cache hierarchy, and faster memory bandwidth, all detailed below.

The launch MSRP for the Core i5-110 is $200. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Core i5-110 uses Intel’s Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The TDP is 65 W. The processor fits the Intel Socket 1200 and is marked as a desktop part. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 630. The multiplier is locked, and the part number is SA35X. The release date is listed as 2025-09-10.

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 family, with the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh codename. It uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip has 20 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. TDP is rated at 55 W. The socket is Intel BGA 2114, and the market segment is mobile. Cache is substantially larger: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. Memory support moves to DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, more than double the i5-110’s figure. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics come from Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The multiplier is unlocked, and the part number is SADST. The release date is listed as 2026-03-16.

Neither processor supports ECC memory. The process node difference is notable: 14 nm versus 3 nm. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also carries a higher boost clock by 1.00 GHz, more than triple the core count, and 18 MB more shared L3 cache. The memory bandwidth advantage for the Ultra 7 is 59.7 GB/s. The PCIe generation gap is one full version, with the Ultra 7 offering Gen 5 instead of Gen 3, and four additional CPU lanes. The i5-110 is socketed for desktop use, while the Ultra 7 is a mobile BGA part, though its performance metrics approach desktop flagship levels.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 20 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus boosts to 5.30 GHz, which is 1.00 GHz higher.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-110 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The difference is 18 MB.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory type?

A: No. The Core i5-110 supports DDR4, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each?

A: The Core i5-110 has a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an average benchmark score of 61834. The Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0 percent delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 (0.1 percent delta), the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61723 (0.2 percent delta), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 (0.8 percent delta).

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process node from Intel. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC.

Q: What is the TDP of each?

A: The Core i5-110 has a TDP of 65 W. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a TDP of 55 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus wins on every dimension where recorded data exists. Its multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23 (41913) and R20 (17603) shows high throughput for heavily parallel workloads. PassMark multi-thread (48270) and integer math (122449) reinforce this. The chip’s 93rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 61834, which places it within 0.2 percent of the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-13900KF, indicate it competes at the top of the desktop CPU range despite being a mobile-part listing. The 20-core configuration, 30 MB of L3 cache, DDR5 support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes all favor the Ultra 7 for memory-intensive and I/O-heavy tasks.

The Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot attribute any workload-specific victory to it. Its specifications do offer some structural advantages: a lower TDP of 65 W versus 55 W is not one, but a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.40 GHz gives it a nominal clock-rate edge at idle or lightly threaded loads, though no measured data supports a real-world win. The desktop socket (Intel Socket 1200) and the $200 launch MSRP are the only distinguishing factors. The locked multiplier and 6-core, 12-thread layout position it as a conventional mid-range desktop part, but without benchmarks, any performance claim remains unverified.

The data therefore splits cleanly: the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the measured performer, matching desktop flagship scores in the database, while the Core i5-110 remains an unmeasured specification sheet. For workloads requiring multi-core rendering, encryption, compression, or floating-point math, the Ultra 7’s recorded scores stand as the only quantified evidence. For a desktop build with a socketed processor and a listed launch MSRP, the i5-110 offers the platform, but no benchmark data supports a performance recommendation.