Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i9-10900TE Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-10600K

CORE STATE Comet Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.1 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-10900TE

CORE STATE Comet Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1800 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
5,378
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,553
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
2,970
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
4,504
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
5,377
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
799
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,220
1,213
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
172
171
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,084
5,058
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
717
714
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,106
12,045
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,709
1,700
geekbench_multicore
6,393
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,477
N/A

Analysis: Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i9-10900TE

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-10600K wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database, taking all six recorded comparisons. The wins are consistent but narrow, with deltas ranging from 0.4% to 0.6% depending on the test. The i5-10600K leads in both single-threaded and multi-threaded Cinebench workloads, which means users get a slight edge across the board rather than a specialization in one area.

The Intel Core i9-10900TE, despite having more cores and threads, does not claim a single benchmark victory. Its highest multi-core score in Cinebench R23 reaches 12045, which trails the i5-10600K by 61 points. In single-core tests, the gap is similarly small: the i9-10900TE scores 1700 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1709 for the i5-10600K. The data positions the i9-10900TE as a processor that trades raw performance for efficiency, as its 35 watt TDP and lower base clock suggest a power-conscious design, but benchmark results show it cannot outpace the i5-10600K in any recorded workload.

The i5-10600K also holds the better overall percentile ranking, sitting at the 55th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the i9-10900TE sits at the 54th percentile. The average benchmark score reinforces this: the i5-10600K averages 3533 across its recorded tests, while the i9-10900TE averages 3484. For users prioritizing maximum performance in Cinebench-style workloads, the i5-10600K is the clear pick based on the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to Intel's Core 10th Gen family and share the Comet Lake architecture, the 14 nm process node, and Intel as the foundry. They use the same Intel Socket 1200, support DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus, and integrate UHD Graphics 630. The PCIe configuration is identical: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configuration differs substantially. The i5-10600K has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-10900TE has 10 cores and 20 threads. This is a 4-core and 8-thread advantage for the i9-10900TE, yet the benchmark results show the i5-10600K still wins every test. The i9-10900TE compensates with a larger L3 cache: 20 MB shared versus 12 MB shared for the i5-10600K. L1 and L2 caches are identical per core at 64 KB and 256 KB respectively.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The i5-10600K has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The i9-10900TE has a dramatically lower base clock of 1800.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The i5-10600K also has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the i9-10900TE is locked. The i9-10900TE has a 35 watt TDP versus 125 watts for the i5-10600K, and its die size is listed at 206 mm², while that field is not recorded for the i5-10600K.

Memory bandwidth also differs: the i9-10900TE supports 46.9 GB/s, while the i5-10600K supports 42.7 GB/s. The i9-10900TE carries a launch MSRP of $488. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both share the same release date of 2020-04-29.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six direct comparisons, all from the Cinebench suite, and the i5-10600K wins each one. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-10600K scores 1220 against 1213 for the i9-10900TE, a 0.6% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows 172 versus 171, also a 0.6% delta.

Cinebench R20 follows the same pattern. The multi-core result is 5084 for the i5-10600K and 5058 for the i9-10900TE, a 0.5% lead. Single-core R20 shows 717 versus 714, a 0.4% margin. The gap narrows slightly in the single-core test, but the direction never changes.

Cinebench R23, the most demanding workload in the comparison, shows the i5-10600K at 12106 multi-core versus 12045 for the i9-10900TE, a 0.5% difference. Single-core R23 is 1709 versus 1700, again 0.5%. Across all six tests, the i5-10600K wins by margins small enough that real-world differences would be difficult to perceive, yet the consistency is notable. The i9-10900TE never manages to convert its 10-core, 20-thread configuration into a win, likely because its 1800.00 MHz base clock severely limits sustained throughput in these workloads.

The i5-10600K also has additional benchmark data beyond the head-to-head set, including 3DMark results. Its 3DMark scores are 5378 for 16 threads, 1553 for 2 threads, 2970 for 4 threads, 4504 for 8 threads, 5377 for max threads, and 799 for single thread. Geekbench results are 6393 multi-core and 1477 single-core. The i9-10900TE has no recorded 3DMark or Geekbench scores in the database, so comparisons in those tests are not possible.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show several differences between the two processors. The i5-10600K has 6 cores and 12 threads; the i9-10900TE has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clock is 4.10 GHz for the i5-10600K versus 1800.00 MHz for the i9-10900TE. Boost clock is 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz. TDP is 125 watts versus 35 watts. L3 cache is 12 MB shared versus 20 MB shared. Memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s versus 46.9 GB/s. The i5-10600K has an unlocked multiplier; the i9-10900TE does not. Die size is recorded as 206 mm² for the i9-10900TE, while no die size is listed for the i5-10600K. The i9-10900TE has a launch MSRP of $488; the i5-10600K has no launch MSRP recorded. Part numbers are SRH6R for the i5-10600K and SRJFC for the i9-10900TE. Everything else, including socket, architecture, process node, foundry, memory type, memory bus, ECC support, PCIe configuration, integrated graphics, market segment, production status, and release date, is identical.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900TE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-10600K has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the i9-10900TE outperform the i5-10600K in multi-core benchmarks?

A: No. The i5-10600K wins all multi-core Cinebench tests, including Cinebench R23 multi-core with a score of 12106 versus 12045 for the i9-10900TE, a 0.5% margin.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The i5-10600K has a TDP of 125 watts, while the i9-10900TE has a TDP of 35 watts. The i9-10900TE is designed for much lower power consumption.

Q: Can either processor be overclocked?

A: The i5-10600K has an unlocked multiplier, so it can be overclocked. The i9-10900TE has a locked multiplier and cannot be overclocked.

Q: How do their single-core scores compare?

A: The i5-10600K leads in every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1709 versus 1700 for the i9-10900TE, a 0.5% advantage.

Q: Do they have the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both processors integrate UHD Graphics 630.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the Intel Core i5-10600K is the faster processor in every recorded benchmark. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, holds a higher percentile ranking at 55 versus 54, and averages a higher benchmark score at 3533 versus 3484. The i9-10900TE's advantages in core count, thread count, and L3 cache size do not translate into performance wins. Its 1800.00 MHz base clock and 35 watt TDP suggest a design focused on power efficiency rather than peak throughput.

Users who want maximum performance in Cinebench-style workloads should choose the i5-10600K. Its higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, unlocked multiplier, and consistent benchmark leads make it the superior option for performance-oriented builds. The i9-10900TE may appeal to those who need more cores and threads for workloads outside the recorded benchmarks, or who require lower power consumption, but the measured data in this database gives the i5-10600K the win across the board. The i9-10900TE also carries a launch MSRP of $488, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-10600K, so pricing comparisons cannot be made from this data alone.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-10600K
i9-10900TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.1
1,800 +43802.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.5 -6.2%
Frequency (GHz)
4.1
1,800 +43802.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.5 -6.2%
Multiplier
41
18 -56.1%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
125
35 -72.0%
PL1
125 W
35 W
PL2
182 W
134 W
Architecture
Architecture
Comet Lake
Comet Lake
Codename
Comet Lake
Comet Lake
Generation
Core i5 (Comet Lake)
Core i9 (Comet Lake)
Process Size
14 nm
14 nm
Die Size
206 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
42.7 GB/s
46.9 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1200
Intel Socket 1200
Chipsets
Intel Z590, Intel Q570, Intel B560
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$488
Part Number
SRH6R
SRJFC
Package
FC-LGA1200
FC-LGA1200
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i5-10600K Details View Core i9-10900TE Details