Intel Core i5-10600 vs Intel Core i5-1335UE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Core i5-1335UE across every Cinebench test, though the margins are consistently narrow. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-1335UE scores 10052 against the i5-10600’s 9809, a 2.5% advantage. The single-core result in the same test follows the same pattern: 1419 versus 1384, again a 2.5% lead. These are not transformative differences, but they are uniform across all six recorded workloads, which suggests a consistent per-thread and multi-threaded edge for the newer mobile part.

Looking at the older Cinebench R20 suite, the i5-1335UE posts 4221 in multi-core and 595 in single-core, while the i5-10600 manages 4119 and 581 respectively. That translates to a 2.5% win in multi-core and a 2.4% win in single-core. The R15 results are tighter in raw terms, with the i5-1335UE scoring 1013 multi-core and 142 single-core against the i5-10600’s 988 and 139. The deltas are 2.5% and 2.2% respectively. Every head-to-head benchmark in the database records the i5-1335UE as the winner, with six wins and zero losses.

The average benchmark score tells a similar story: the i5-1335UE sits at 2907, while the i5-10600 is at 2837. That places the two chips in the same performance tier, with the i5-1335UE holding a 2.5% overall edge based on the aggregated data. Both processors land at the 51st percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy essentially the same position in the broader performance distribution. The closest rival to the i5-1335UE is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 at 2909, a 0.1% difference, while the i5-10600’s nearest competitor is the Intel Core i7-6800K at 2838, a 0% delta. In short, the recorded data indicates that the i5-1335UE is marginally faster in every measured scenario, but the gap is small enough that real-world differences would likely be imperceptible in most tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The i5-1335UE is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-U variant, and uses a 10 nm process node. The i5-10600 uses the older Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm node. This process shrink is a major factor in the i5-1335UE’s efficiency and clock behavior, though the raw clock speeds tell a more complicated story.

The i5-1335UE has a base clock of 1300 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The i5-10600 runs at a 3.30 GHz base and a 4.80 GHz boost. Despite the i5-10600’s higher clocks, the i5-1335UE still manages to win every benchmark, which points to architectural efficiency gains in Raptor Lake. The i5-1335UE also uses a hybrid core arrangement, although the database does not specify the exact performance/efficiency core split; it does list 10 cores and 12 threads, meaning it has a mix of cores where not all are multi-threaded. The i5-10600 is a traditional 6-core, 12-thread design with all cores capable of simultaneous multi-threading.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The i5-1335UE features 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, while the i5-10600 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core. Both processors share 12 MB of L3 cache, so the total cache pool is identical at the last level, but the per-core L1 and L2 allocations are much larger on the i5-1335UE. This could explain part of its single-core advantage, as larger caches reduce the need to fetch data from slower memory.

Memory support also diverges. The i5-1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the i5-10600 is limited to DDR4. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The i5-10600 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s; the i5-1335UE’s bandwidth is not listed in the database. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the i5-1335UE provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), whereas the i5-10600 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer chip offers a faster per-lane standard but fewer total lanes.

The integrated graphics are another point of separation. The i5-1335UE comes with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the i5-10600 uses UHD Graphics 630. The socket and market segment also differ: the i5-1335UE uses Intel BGA 1744 and is a mobile part, while the i5-10600 uses Intel Socket 1200 and is a desktop part. The i5-1335UE has a 15 W TDP, dramatically lower than the i5-10600’s 65 W TDP. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and both lack ECC memory support. The i5-1335UE was released on 2023-01-03, while the i5-10600 was released on 2020-04-29.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1335UE wins all multi-core benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 10052 versus 9809 for the i5-10600, a 2.5% difference. The R20 and R15 multi-core tests show the same 2.5% margin.

Q: Does the i5-1335UE also lead in single-threaded performance?

A: Yes. The i5-1335UE wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1419 against 1384, a 2.5% lead. The R20 and R15 single-core deltas are 2.4% and 2.2% respectively.

Q: How do the two chips compare in terms of core and thread counts?

A: The i5-1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the i5-10600 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The i5-1335UE has more physical cores, but the same thread count, indicating a hybrid arrangement where some cores do not support multi-threading.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The i5-1335UE has a 15 W TDP, while the i5-10600 has a 65 W TDP. This makes the i5-1335UE substantially more power-efficient on paper, despite delivering slightly higher benchmark scores.

Q: Which processor supports newer memory and PCIe standards?

A: The i5-1335UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the i5-10600 supports only DDR4. The i5-1335UE also uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the i5-10600 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

Q: Do both processors have similar overall performance rankings?

A: Yes. Both sit at the 51st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The i5-1335UE has an average benchmark score of 2907, and the i5-10600 has an average of 2837, a 2.5% gap.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear but modest winner: the Intel Core i5-1335UE outperforms the i5-10600 in every recorded benchmark. The margins range from 2.2% to 2.5%, which means the i5-1335UE is consistently ahead but not dramatically so. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, the i5-1335UE delivers 10052 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus the i5-10600’s 9809. For users focused on single-thread responsiveness, the i5-1335UE leads with 1419 versus 1384 in the same test suite.

The architecture differences make the i5-1335UE the more modern choice: it uses a 10 nm process versus 14 nm, supports DDR5 memory, has a larger per-core L1 and L2 cache, and carries a much lower 15 W TDP. The i5-10600, however, offers higher base and boost clocks (3.30 GHz / 4.80 GHz versus 1.30 GHz / 4.50 GHz) and more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8), though at the older Gen 3 standard. The i5-10600 also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, a figure not listed for the i5-1335UE.

Who should pick which? The i5-1335UE is the better choice for anyone who values efficiency, modern platform features, and slightly higher benchmark scores. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for compact or thermally constrained systems, and the DDR5 support future-proofs memory compatibility. The i5-10600, despite losing every benchmark, remains a viable desktop part with higher clocks and more PCIe lanes, which could matter for users with expansion needs. However, based purely on the recorded performance data, the i5-1335UE is the faster processor in all six tested scenarios.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1335UE | Intel Core i5-10600 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1300 MHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 42.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2020-04-29 |

| Part Number | Not listed | SRH37 |

| Percentile | 51 | 51 |