Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Xeon D-1548 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-10400H and Intel Xeon D-1548 are both 14 nm processors with a 45 W TDP, but they target different segments: the i5 is a mobile part, while the Xeon is built for servers and workstations. The recorded data shows the Xeon D-1548 ahead in every Cinebench comparison, while the i5-10400H brings integrated graphics and a higher boost clock. This analysis examines what the benchmark results imply for each processor.

The Verdict

For workloads that resemble the Cinebench rendering tests, the Intel Xeon D-1548 is the stronger choice. It leads the i5-10400H by roughly 10% in all six recorded Cinebench tests, both multi-core and single-core. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the i5, which matters for server and workstation reliability. The i5-10400H, however, is the only one of the two with integrated graphics, making it the sole option for a mobile system that needs a display output without a discrete GPU. It also has a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz vs 2.60 GHz), though the Cinebench single-core scores still favor the Xeon. In short, the Xeon D-1548 is the pick for compute-heavy server or workstation tasks, while the i5-10400H suits mobile laptops where integrated graphics and a newer platform are priorities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1548 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-10400H has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which supports ECC memory?

A: The Xeon D-1548 supports ECC memory; the i5-10400H does not.

Q: Which has integrated graphics?

A: The i5-10400H includes UHD Graphics, while the Xeon D-1548 has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which has a higher boost clock?

A: The i5-10400H boosts to 4.60 GHz, whereas the Xeon D-1548 boosts to 2.60 GHz.

Q: Which wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Xeon D-1548 scores 7713 versus 6924 for the i5-10400H, a lead of 10.2%.

Q: Which is newer?

A: The i5-10400H was released in April 2020, while the Xeon D-1548 was released in October 2015.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 14 nm process, but they use different microarchitectures. The i5-10400H is based on Comet Lake (codename Comet Lake-H), while the Xeon D-1548 uses Broadwell (codename Broadwell). The Xeon has twice the core count: 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads on the i5. The cache layout also differs. The i5 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Xeon provides 1.5 MB of L3 per core, which totals 12 MB across its 8 cores (though the database does not list a total L3 figure). The Xeon includes ECC memory support, a feature absent on the i5. The Xeon also exposes 24 PCIe lanes (CPU only) under Gen 3, while the i5 simply lists Gen 3 without a lane count. The Xeon has no integrated graphics, whereas the i5 includes UHD Graphics. The Xeon is a server/workstation part, while the i5 is a mobile processor. The Xeon also has recorded transistor and die size data: 3,200 million transistors and a 246 mm² die, while the i5 has no such figures in the database.

Specification Differences

The following table lists the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded data.

| Field | Intel Core i5-10400H | Intel Xeon D-1548 |

|-------|----------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | Intel BGA 1667 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Broadwell |

| Codename | Comet Lake-H | Broadwell |

| Generation | Core i5 (Comet Lake-H) | Xeon D (Broadwell-DE) |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 3,200 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 246 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (per core) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 24 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2020-04-01 | 2015-10-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $555 |

| Part Number | SRH8R | SR2DJ |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes six Cinebench comparisons, and the Xeon D-1548 wins all of them. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Xeon scores 777 against 697 for the i5, a lead of 10.3%. In R15 single-core, the Xeon scores 109 versus 98, a 10.1% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Xeon leads 3239 to 2908 in multi-core (10.2%) and 457 to 410 in single-core (10.3%). In Cinebench R23, the Xeon scores 7713 versus 6924 in multi-core (10.2%) and 1089 versus 977 in single-core (10.3%). The i5-10400H also has recorded Geekbench scores of 5000 multi-core and 1413 single-core, but the Xeon D-1548 has no Geekbench entries in the database, so no direct comparison is possible for that benchmark suite. The consistent 10% margin across all Cinebench tests suggests that the Xeon's additional cores and threads provide a clear performance advantage in these rendering workloads, even though the i5 has a much higher boost clock.

Where Each One Wins

The Xeon D-1548 wins every head-to-head benchmark recorded, so it is the clear winner in Cinebench-based workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with ECC memory support, make it suitable for server and workstation tasks that demand reliability and parallel processing. The i5-10400H, on the other hand, has no head-to-head wins, but it offers integrated graphics, which the Xeon lacks. This makes the i5 the only option for a mobile system that needs a display output without a discrete GPU. The i5 also has a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz vs 2.60 GHz), though the Cinebench single-core scores still favor the Xeon, indicating that the higher clock does not translate into a win in those tests. The i5 is a mobile part, while the Xeon is a server/workstation part, so the use case split is clear: the Xeon for compute-heavy, ECC-requiring environments, and the i5 for laptops and portable systems where integrated graphics and a newer platform are essential.