Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i5-7600 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1035G4 and the Intel Core i5-7600 are both quad-core parts from Intel, but they target entirely different platforms and use different architectural philosophies. The 1035G4 is a 15 W mobile chip built on Ice Lake-U, while the 7600 is a 65 W desktop part from the Kaby Lake generation. Despite the desktop chip’s higher clock speeds, the benchmark data shows the mobile Ice Lake part winning every single head-to-head comparison, often by a margin of about 15%. This makes the comparison less about raw clock speed and more about the efficiency of the newer architecture and its support for simultaneous multithreading.

Where Each One Wins

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-1035G4 wins in every benchmark category recorded. Across all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, the 1035G4 takes the victory, with zero wins for the i5-7600. This is a clean sweep, but the nature of the wins matters for real-world use cases. The 1035G4’s advantage is consistent at roughly 15.1% in both single-core and multi-core workloads, which indicates that the newer architecture is simply more efficient at executing instructions per clock, despite its much lower base frequency of 1100 MHz compared to the 7600’s 3500 MHz.

For multi-threaded productivity, the 1035G4’s 8 threads versus the 7600’s 4 threads provide a clear structural advantage. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 1035G4 scores 6436 against the 7600’s 5591, a 15.1% lead. This suggests that for video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation tasks that scale with thread count, the mobile chip is the better choice. Interestingly, the 1035G4 also wins in single-core tests, where thread count is irrelevant. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 908 beats the 7600’s 789 by the same 15.1% margin, proving that the Ice Lake core design is simply stronger per core than the older Kaby Lake design.

The i5-7600 does not have any category where it comes out ahead. Its only advantage is in platform-level characteristics, such as a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1151) and a higher TDP of 65 W, which in a desktop chassis allows for more sustained power delivery. But in terms of pure benchmark output, the 1035G4 dominates. The 1035G4’s average benchmark score is 1861, while the 7600 sits at 1844, a difference of 0.9% in favor of the mobile chip. Both processors share the same 42nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning they sit in the same performance tier overall, but the 1035G4 achieves that standing with far lower power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two chips is significant. The 1035G4 is built on Ice Lake, specifically the Ice Lake-U codename, using a 10 nm process node. The 7600 is Kaby Lake, using a 14 nm node. This process shrink is a major factor in the 1035G4’s efficiency, allowing it to deliver competitive performance within a 15 W TDP. The 7600, by contrast, has a 65 W TDP, more than four times the power budget, yet it still loses in every benchmark.

Core and thread counts differ as well. The 1035G4 offers 4 cores and 8 threads, while the 7600 offers 4 cores and 4 threads. The 1035G4’s support for Hyper-Threading effectively doubles its logical core count, which explains its multi-core wins. The L1 cache also differs: the 1035G4 has 80 KB per core, while the 7600 has 64 KB per core. Both chips share the same 256 KB L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

The integrated graphics are another point of divergence. The 1035G4 comes with Iris Plus graphics, while the 7600 has HD 630. The 1035G4’s graphics solution is designed for a mobile platform, where the GPU is often used for media playback and light content creation. The 7600’s HD 630 is a basic desktop GPU. Memory bandwidth also favors the 1035G4, which supports 51.2 GB/s versus the 7600’s 38.4 GB/s, despite both using dual-channel DDR4. The 1035G4 also features a smaller die size at 123 mm², while the 7600’s die size is not listed.

The socket situation is completely different. The 1035G4 uses Intel BGA 1526, which is a soldered mobile package, while the 7600 uses Intel Socket 1151, a standard desktop socket. PCIe support is Gen 3 for both, but the 7600 specifies 16 lanes for the CPU, while the 1035G4’s lane count is not detailed in the data. Both chips are actively in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The 1035G4’s generation is listed as “Core i5 (Sunny Cove-U),” while the 7600 is “Core i5 (Kaby Lake).”

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are remarkably consistent across the board. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 1035G4 scores 648 against the 7600’s 563, a 15.1% advantage. The single-core test shows the same pattern: 91 versus 79, also a 15.2% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the 1035G4 scores 2703 in multi-core and 381 in single-core, while the 7600 scores 2348 and 331 respectively. Both deltas are 15.1%. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, the most recent test in the set, where the 1035G4 scores 6436 multi-core and 908 single-core, against the 7600’s 5591 and 789, again a 15.1% difference in both cases.

The consistency of the 15.1% delta across all tests is striking. It suggests that the performance gap is not workload-dependent but rather a fundamental architectural efficiency difference. Whether the task is heavily threaded or purely single-threaded, the 1035G4 maintains the same relative lead. This is a strong indicator that the Ice Lake core design, combined with the 10 nm process, delivers a uniform performance uplift over the Kaby Lake design.

The 7600 does have additional Geekbench scores listed: 3704 multi-core and 1344 single-core. However, since no corresponding Geekbench results are provided for the 1035G4, these scores cannot be used for a direct comparison. They do, however, give context for the 7600’s overall capability. The 7600’s average benchmark score of 1844 places it close to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (1836, 0.5% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U (1832, 0.7% delta). The 1035G4’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i3-9350K, with an average score of 1867, a negligible 0.3% difference.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1035G4 is faster in all multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 6436 versus the i5-7600’s 5591, a 15.1% advantage. This is partly due to its 8 threads versus the 7600’s 4 threads.

Q: Does the desktop i5-7600 win any benchmark?

A: No. Across all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, the i5-7600 loses every time. The 1035G4 wins all six comparisons, with deltas ranging from 15.1% to 15.2%.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The 1035G4 has a TDP of 15 W, while the 7600 has a TDP of 65 W. Despite the 7600 having more than four times the power budget, it still scores lower in every benchmark.

Q: What are the key architectural differences?

A: The 1035G4 uses a 10 nm Ice Lake process with 8 threads and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The 7600 uses a 14 nm Kaby Lake process with 4 threads and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. Both share 6 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support.

Q: Which chip has better integrated graphics?

A: The 1035G4 comes with Iris Plus graphics, while the 7600 has HD 630 graphics. The 1035G4’s memory bandwidth is also higher at 51.2 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s for the 7600.

Q: Are they in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both chips sit at the 42nd percentile among all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores are close: 1861 for the 1035G4 and 1844 for the 7600, a 0.9% difference in favor of the 1035G4.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Core i5-7600 |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 1100 MHz | 3500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1526 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Ice Lake | Kaby Lake |

| Codename | Ice Lake-U | Kaby Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus | HD 630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2019-07-31 | 2017-01-02 |

| Part Number | SRGKK | SR334 |

The specification table highlights the fundamental differences. The 7600 has a higher base and boost clock, but the 1035G4 compensates with a newer process, more threads, and larger L1 cache. The 1035G4’s memory bandwidth is substantially higher, which helps with integrated graphics performance and memory-intensive tasks. The socket difference is critical: the 1035G4 is a soldered mobile chip, while the 7600 fits into a desktop motherboard. Neither chip supports ECC memory or has an unlocked multiplier. Both are currently listed as active in production. The 1035G4’s die size is 123 mm², while the 7600’s die size is not listed in the data.