Intel Core i5-1035G1 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a complete sweep for the Intel Xeon Gold 6330 across every recorded Cinebench test. In the six head-to-head comparisons, the Xeon Gold 6330 wins all six, with the Core i5-1035G1 recording zero victories. The margin of victory is remarkably consistent, with the Xeon Gold 6330 outperforming the Core i5-1035G1 by exactly 80.4% in each test. This uniformity suggests the performance gap is driven by fundamental architectural and resource differences rather than workload-specific behaviors.

Looking at the multicore results first, the disparity is stark. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon Gold 6330 scores 3115 against the Core i5-1035G1's 611. The R20 multicore test shows a similar pattern: 12980 for the Xeon Gold 6330 versus 2546 for the Core i5-1035G1. The R23 multicore benchmark pushes the gap further, with the Xeon Gold 6330 reaching 30906 while the Core i5-1035G1 manages only 6062. These results indicate that the Xeon Gold 6330's 28 cores and 56 threads provide a decisive advantage in heavily parallelized workloads, as each multicore score is roughly five times higher than the mobile chip's output.

The single-core results are equally one-sided, though the relative gap is identical. The Xeon Gold 6330 scores 439 in Cinebench R15 single-core against 86 for the Core i5-1035G1. In R20 single-core, the scores are 1832 and 359, respectively. The R23 single-core test shows 4363 for the Xeon Gold 6330 and 855 for the Core i5-1035G1. The consistent 80.4% delta across both single and multicore tests is notable. It suggests that the Xeon Gold 6330's per-core performance advantage is proportional to its overall resource advantage, rather than being a product of scaling efficiency alone.

The Core i5-1035G1 does have its own benchmark profile outside of the head-to-head comparisons. Its PassMark results show a single-thread score of 2198 and a multithread score of 7211. The data compression test yields 80534, while floating point math reaches 15483 and integer math hits 26645. These numbers indicate that the mobile processor is competitive in its own segment, but they do not appear in the head-to-head table, meaning they cannot be directly compared with the Xeon Gold 6330's recorded results.

The average benchmark score for the Core i5-1035G1 is 9684, which places it in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. The Xeon Gold 6330 also sits in the 65th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 8939. This is an interesting data point: despite the Xeon Gold 6330 dominating the Cinebench tests, its overall average score is actually lower than the Core i5-1035G1's. The explanation lies in the nearest rivals for each chip. The Core i5-1035G1's closest rivals include the Intel Core i7-3770 with an average score of 9706 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD EPYC 7402P at 9529 (+1.6%), the Intel Core i7-7700HQ at 9493 (+2%), and the Intel Core 3 N350 at 9903 (-2.2%). The Xeon Gold 6330's rivals include the Intel Core i7-8650U at 8932 (+0.1%), the Intel Core i5-8350U at 8998 (-0.7%), the Intel Core i5-1135G7 at 9053 (-1.3%), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 at 9155 (-2.4%). The database's averaging methodology evidently weights a broader set of workloads, and the Core i5-1035G1's PassMark scores, which include many tests not run on the Xeon Gold 6330, boost its average.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion for users choosing between these two processors. The Intel Xeon Gold 6330 is the superior performer in every recorded Cinebench benchmark, both single and multicore. Its 80.4% lead over the Core i5-1035G1 across all six tests is unambiguous. Anyone whose primary workloads are CPU-bound rendering, simulation, or other tasks represented by Cinebench should select the Xeon Gold 6330 without hesitation.

The Core i5-1035G1, however, serves a different purpose entirely. Its 15 watt TDP, mobile socket, and integrated UHD Graphics indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops. The Xeon Gold 6330, by contrast, is a 205 watt server and workstation part with a Socket 4189 package and no integrated graphics. The Core i5-1035G1's PassMark results, including a single-thread score of 2198 and a data compression score of 80534, show that it is not a weak chip in absolute terms. It simply competes in a different class.

The percentile data is worth noting for context. Both processors sit at the 65th percentile of all CPUs, which means each is positioned similarly within the broader database landscape. The Xeon Gold 6330's lower average benchmark score of 8939, compared to the Core i5-1035G1's 9684, reflects the fact that the server chip was only tested on Cinebench workloads, while the mobile chip has a fuller suite of PassMark results. This does not diminish the Xeon Gold 6330's head-to-head dominance, but it does caution against using the average score as a sole decision metric.

For a user who needs sustained multicore throughput in a server rack or workstation chassis, the Xeon Gold 6330 is the only rational choice. For a user who needs a capable mobile processor with integrated graphics and low power consumption, the Core i5-1035G1 is the appropriate pick. There is no scenario in the recorded data where the Core i5-1035G1 outperforms the Xeon Gold 6330, so the decision must rest on form factor, power envelope, and platform requirements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Xeon Gold 6330 wins all six recorded head-to-head Cinebench tests. The Core i5-1035G1 records zero wins in these comparisons.

Q: What is the performance delta between the two processors in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Xeon Gold 6330 scores 30906 while the Core i5-1035G1 scores 6062, giving the Xeon Gold 6330 an 80.4% advantage.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-core performance?

A: The Xeon Gold 6330 leads in every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 4363 against 855 for the Core i5-1035G1, again an 80.4% delta.

Q: Do both processors have the same percentile ranking?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-1035G1 and the Intel Xeon Gold 6330 are recorded at the 65th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core i5-1035G1 has an average benchmark score of 9684, while the Xeon Gold 6330 has an average score of 8939. This reflects the broader set of PassMark tests recorded for the mobile chip.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the Core i5-1035G1 wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmark table, the Core i5-1035G1 does not win any of the six tests. Its separate PassMark results exist but are not part of the head-to-head comparison.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Core i5-1035G1 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330 has 28 cores and 56 threads. The base clock for the Core i5-1035G1 is 1000 MHz, whereas the Xeon Gold 6330 starts at 2000 MHz. The boost clocks also differ, with the Core i5-1035G1 reaching 3.60 GHz and the Xeon Gold 6330 reaching 3.10 GHz. Notably, the mobile chip has a higher boost clock, but the server chip has a higher base clock.

The thermal design power is dramatically different. The Core i5-1035G1 is rated at 15 watts, while the Xeon Gold 6330 is rated at 205 watts. The sockets are incompatible: the Core i5-1035G1 uses Intel BGA 1526, and the Xeon Gold 6330 uses Intel Socket 4189.

Memory support differs in channel width and bandwidth. The Core i5-1035G1 supports dual-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon Gold 6330 supports eight-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. The Xeon Gold 6330 also supports ECC memory, while the Core i5-1035G1 does not.

PCI Express capabilities are another differentiator. The Core i5-1035G1 supports PCIe Gen 3, while the Xeon Gold 6330 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 64 lanes (CPU only). The Core i5-1035G1 includes integrated UHD Graphics, whereas the Xeon Gold 6330 has no integrated graphics. The market segments are also distinct: the Core i5-1035G1 is a mobile part, and the Xeon Gold 6330 is a server or workstation part.

The release dates differ as well. The Core i5-1035G1 was released on 2019-07-31, and the Xeon Gold 6330 was released on 2021-04-05. Both processors remain in active production.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's Ice Lake architecture, but they target different platform variants. The Core i5-1035G1 uses the Ice Lake-U codename, while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses the Ice Lake-SP codename. Both are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node.

The cache hierarchies are structured differently. The Core i5-1035G1 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon Gold 6330 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 42 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size for the Core i5-1035G1 is 123 mm², while the die size for the Xeon Gold 6330 is not recorded in the database.

The generation labels reflect the platform split. The Core i5-1035G1 is listed under the generation "Core i5 (Sunny Cove-U)", and the Xeon Gold 6330 is listed under "Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP)". Both use DDR4 memory, but the memory bus width differs as noted in the specification section.

The integrated graphics difference is a significant architectural divergence. The Core i5-1035G1 includes UHD Graphics, making it a self-contained mobile solution. The Xeon Gold 6330 has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU or a platform with its own display output. The PCIe generation gap, Gen 3 for the mobile chip and Gen 4 with 64 lanes for the server chip, further separates the two from a platform connectivity standpoint.

The part numbers also differ: the Core i5-1035G1 is identified as SRGKGSRGKL, and the Xeon Gold 6330 as SRKHMCD8068904572101. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part per the recorded data.