Intel Core i5-10200H vs Intel Core i7-5950HQ Comparison

The benchmark data places the Intel Core i7-5950HQ and Intel Core i5-10200H in a statistical tie on aggregate performance, with average benchmark scores of 2158 and 2154 respectively. However, the composition of those scores reveals two distinctly different performance profiles. The i5-10200H dominates in Cinebench workloads, while the i7-5950HQ counters with a decisive win in Geekbench multi-core. The overall percentile ranking for both is identical at 47, yet the i5-10200H is the more consistent performer across the majority of tests, taking 6 of the 8 head-to-head matchups.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite is a complete victory for the Intel Core i5-10200H. Across all six Cinebench iterations, the i5-10200H wins by a remarkably consistent margin of roughly 4%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-10200H scores 684 against the i7-5950HQ’s 656, a delta of -4.1%. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern: 96 versus 92, a -4.2% delta. This consistency continues through R20 and R23. In R20 multi-core, the i5-10200H posts 2853 versus 2736, while R20 single-core shows 402 versus 386. The R23 results mirror this exactly: 6795 versus 6516 in multi-core and 959 versus 920 in single-core. Every Cinebench delta sits between -4.0% and -4.2%, indicating that the i5-10200H holds a uniform performance advantage in this rendering workload.

The Geekbench results tell a completely different story. The Intel Core i7-5950HQ wins the Geekbench multi-core test decisively, scoring 4601 against the i5-10200H’s 4096. That is a 12.3% delta in favor of the older chip. The single-core Geekbench test is nearly a tie, with the i7-5950HQ edging out a 1353 to 1347 win, a razor-thin 0.4% margin. This split between Cinebench and Geekbench is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The i5-10200H is consistently faster in one benchmark family, while the i7-5950HQ delivers a substantial advantage in another. The net effect is that the aggregate scores are nearly identical, but the workloads that produced them could not be more different.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-10200H is the clear choice for Cinebench-style rendering workloads. Its wins across R15, R20, and R23 in both single- and multi-threaded tests demonstrate that it has a consistent edge in this type of CPU-bound rendering task. The 4% advantage is uniform, meaning it scales from single-core to multi-core operations. This suggests that the i5-10200H’s higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz, compared to the i7-5950HQ’s 3.80 GHz, translates directly into better rendering performance. For users running 3D modeling, video rendering, or any application relying on Cinebench-like calculations, the i5-10200H is the better processor.

The Intel Core i7-5950HQ wins decisively in Geekbench multi-core, a benchmark that often reflects a broader mix of integer and floating-point operations, memory access patterns, and real-world application scenarios. The 12.3% margin here is substantial. The i7-5950HQ scores 4601 against 4096, a gap that dwarfs the 4% Cinebench advantage the i5-10200H holds. The single-core Geekbench test is essentially a dead heat, so the multi-core result cannot be attributed to raw clock speed. Instead, it points to architectural efficiency in the Broadwell design. For workloads that resemble Geekbench’s mixed workload profile, the i7-5950HQ is the stronger part.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel’s 14 nm process node, but they represent different architectural generations. The i7-5950HQ uses the Broadwell architecture, specifically the Broadwell-H codename, and belongs to the Core i7 (Broadwell-H) generation. The i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake architecture, specifically Comet Lake-H, and belongs to the Core i5 (Comet Lake-H) generation. Comet Lake is a later iteration of the same process node, which explains why the i5-10200H can achieve a higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz versus the i7-5950HQ’s 3.80 GHz, despite having a lower base clock of 2.40 GHz versus 2.90 GHz.

The core and cache configurations are identical between the two. Both have 4 cores and 8 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither supports ECC memory. The process node, foundry (Intel), and core count are the same. The differences start with memory support. The i7-5950HQ supports only DDR3, while the i5-10200H supports both DDR3 and DDR4. This leads to a major memory bandwidth difference: the i5-10200H has a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the i7-5950HQ is limited to 29.9 GB/s. The socket also differs, with the i7-5950HQ using Intel BGA 1364 and the i5-10200H using Intel BGA 1440.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The i7-5950HQ features Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while the i5-10200H uses UHD Graphics. The i7-5950HQ has a larger die size at 182 mm², while the i5-10200H’s die size is not listed. The PCIe support is also stated differently: the i7-5950HQ lists Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-10200H simply lists Gen 3. The i7-5950HQ is end-of-life, released in June 2015, while the i5-10200H is active, released in September 2020. The i7-5950HQ launched with an MSRP of $623, while the i5-10200H has no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-10200H has a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-5950HQ has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes, both have 4 cores and 8 threads, and both have 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-10200H supports both DDR3 and DDR4 and has a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-5950HQ supports only DDR3 and has a memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s.

Q: What is the difference in Geekbench multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-5950HQ scores 4601 in Geekbench multi-core, which is 12.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-10200H’s score of 4096.

Q: Which processor is still in production?

A: The Intel Core i5-10200H is marked as active. The Intel Core i7-5950HQ is marked as end-of-life.

Q: Are both processors built on the same process node?

A: Yes, both use Intel’s 14 nm process node, but they use different architectures: Broadwell for the i7-5950HQ and Comet Lake for the i5-10200H.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-5950HQ | Intel Core i5-10200H |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 47 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1364 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Broadwell | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Broadwell-H | Comet Lake-H |

| Generation | Core i7 (Broadwell-H) | Core i5 (Comet Lake-H) |

| Die Size | 182 mm² | Not listed |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3, DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | UHD Graphics |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2015-06-01 | 2020-09-16 |

| Launch MSRP | $623 | None listed |

| Part Number | SR2BJ | SRK3X |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split decision based on workload. The Intel Core i5-10200H is the superior processor for Cinebench-based rendering, winning all six tests by a consistent 4% margin. Its higher boost clock and doubled memory bandwidth give it a tangible edge in this workload. For users whose primary tasks involve rendering, the i5-10200H is the better choice.

The Intel Core i7-5950HQ is the winner in Geekbench multi-core, with a 12.3% advantage. This is a larger margin than any Cinebench delta, and it indicates that for mixed, real-world application workloads represented by Geekbench, the older Broadwell architecture is more efficient. The i7-5950HQ also has the more capable integrated graphics solution with Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

The aggregate scores are nearly identical, but the underlying performance profiles are not. The i5-10200H wins the majority of benchmarks (6 of 8), but the i7-5950HQ wins the one test by a larger margin. The i5-10200H offers the advantage of being an active product with support for DDR4 memory, while the i7-5950HQ is end-of-life. The verdict depends entirely on which benchmark family better represents the user’s workload. For Cinebench-type rendering, the i5-10200H is the pick. For Geekbench-type mixed workloads, the i7-5950HQ is the pick. Given that the i5-10200H wins more tests and is the active product, it is the safer default recommendation, but the i7-5950HQ’s Geekbench dominance cannot be ignored.