Intel Core i5-10200H vs Intel Core i7-1160G7 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-10200H and Intel Core i7-1160G7 are both 4-core, 8-thread mobile processors, but they target very different system designs. One is a high-power H-series chip for gaming laptops, the other a low-power U-series part for ultraportables. Benchmark results show a consistent, if modest, performance advantage for the newer, lower-TDP chip across every tested workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-1160G7 wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The margins are remarkably uniform, hovering around 7.5% in every test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-1160G7 scores 7,343 against the i5-10200H’s 6,795, a difference of 7.5%. Single-core performance tells the same story, with the i7-1160G7 posting 1,036 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 959 for the i5-10200H, a 7.4% gap.

This pattern repeats across the entire Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R20, the i7-1160G7 leads multi-core 3,084 to 2,853 (7.5% ahead) and single-core 435 to 402 (7.6% ahead). The older Cinebench R15 test shows the i7-1160G7 ahead 740 to 684 in multi-core (7.6%) and 104 to 96 in single-core (7.7%). The i5-10200H does have one benchmark in its favor from the broader dataset: Geekbench multi-core, where it scores 4,096, and Geekbench single-core at 1,347. However, the i7-1160G7 does not have Geekbench scores listed in the head-to-head data, so this cannot be directly compared.

The average benchmark score separates the two by a slim margin. The i5-10200H averages 2,154, while the i7-1160G7 averages 2,124. This puts the i5-10200H in the 47th percentile of all CPUs and the i7-1160G7 in the 46th percentile. The i7-1160G7's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C, is only 0.1% behind it, while the i5-10200H's closest competitor, the Intel Core i5-7640X, is 0.6% ahead. In short, despite losing every head-to-head test, the i5-10200H's overall standing is essentially equivalent, suggesting the Geekbench scores carry significant weight in the aggregate.

Architecture Differences

These chips represent two different Intel design philosophies. The i5-10200H is a Comet Lake-H part built on Intel's 14 nm process, while the i7-1160G7 is a Tiger Lake-U part on the newer 10 nm node. The i7-1160G7 also has a known die size of 144 mm², whereas the i5-10200H's die size is not specified.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The i5-10200H has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-1160G7 offers more at every level: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-1160G7's L2 cache is nearly five times larger per core, which likely contributes to its consistent single-core advantage.

Memory support is another divider. The i5-10200H supports DDR3 and DDR4 memory with dual-channel access and a peak bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. The i7-1160G7 supports only LPDDR4X, also dual-channel, but with a lower peak bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s. The i5-10200H's higher bandwidth is a clear advantage for memory-intensive tasks.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The i5-10200H uses PCIe Gen 3, while the i7-1160G7 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 4 lanes on the CPU. Integrated graphics are different as well: the i5-10200H has UHD Graphics, while the i7-1160G7 features the more capable Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units.

The most striking difference is thermal design power. The i5-10200H has a 45 W TDP, while the i7-1160G7 is rated at just 15 W. The i7-1160G7 achieves its performance lead while using one-third of the power budget, a signal of the efficiency gains from the newer 10 nm process and Tiger Lake architecture.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-1160G7 wins every single benchmark test that directly compares the two. This makes the performance picture clear: it is the faster CPU in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 7.5% lead, and single-core shows a 7.4% lead. The i7-1160G7's victories are consistent, not flukes of a single test.

The i5-10200H's strengths lie outside the benchmark suite. It supports DDR3 and DDR4 memory, giving system builders flexibility in memory choice. Its 46.9 GB/s memory bandwidth is 37.5% higher than the i7-1160G7's 34.1 GB/s. This could translate to real-world advantages in scenarios that are heavily dependent on memory throughput, even if the raw compute benchmarks do not reflect it.

The i5-10200H also uses PCIe Gen 3, which is older but more widely supported across existing hardware. The i7-1160G7's PCIe Gen 4 with only 4 CPU lanes is a more limited implementation. For users needing to connect multiple high-bandwidth devices, the i5-10200H's broader PCIe compatibility may be more practical. The i5-10200H is also still listed as "Active" in production, while the i7-1160G7 is marked "End-of-life."

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-1160G7 wins all multi-core tests. It leads by 7.5% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,343 vs 6,795), 7.5% in Cinebench R20 (3,084 vs 2,853), and 7.6% in Cinebench R15 (740 vs 684).

Q: Is the i5-10200H better in single-core performance?

A: No. The i7-1160G7 wins every single-core test, with leads of 7.4% in Cinebench R23 (1,036 vs 959), 7.6% in Cinebench R20 (435 vs 402), and 7.7% in Cinebench R15 (104 vs 96).

Q: How do their memory systems compare?

A: The i5-10200H supports DDR3 and DDR4 with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth. The i7-1160G7 supports only LPDDR4X with 34.1 GB/s bandwidth. The i5-10200H has significantly higher peak memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The i5-10200H has a 45 W TDP, while the i7-1160G7 has a 15 W TDP. The i7-1160G7 delivers higher benchmark scores while consuming substantially less power.

Q: Which CPU has more cache?

A: The i7-1160G7 has more cache at every level. It has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The i5-10200H has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3.

Q: Are there benchmark results where the i5-10200H wins?

A: In the head-to-head benchmark data, the i5-10200H does not win any of the six tests. However, its Geekbench scores (4,096 multi-core, 1,347 single-core) are listed, while no Geekbench scores are provided for the i7-1160G7.

The Verdict

The choice between these two CPUs depends entirely on system priorities, not raw performance. The i7-1160G7 is the faster processor in every directly comparable benchmark. It wins all six head-to-head tests by roughly 7.5%, and it does so with a 15 W TDP versus the i5-10200H's 45 W. For any workload measured by Cinebench, the i7-1160G7 is the clear winner.

The i5-10200H justifies its existence through platform characteristics. It supports more memory types (DDR3 and DDR4) and offers higher peak memory bandwidth at 46.9 GB/s. It uses PCIe Gen 3, which may be more compatible with existing hardware. It remains in active production, whereas the i7-1160G7 is end-of-life. The i5-10200H also has a higher average benchmark score (2,154 vs 2,124), though this appears to be influenced by Geekbench results that are not available for the i7-1160G7.

From the data, the i7-1160G7 is the better choice for pure compute performance and energy efficiency. Its 10 nm process, larger caches, and higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz (against the i5-10200H's 4.10 GHz) deliver measurable wins. The i5-10200H makes sense for systems where memory bandwidth and broad memory compatibility matter more than peak CPU throughput. It is also the safer long-term procurement choice given its active production status.

The i7-1160G7 carries a launch MSRP of $426. The i5-10200H has no listed launch MSRP. Buyers seeking the fastest benchmark scores should choose the i7-1160G7. Buyers prioritizing memory flexibility, higher bandwidth, or a currently produced part should consider the i5-10200H.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-10200H | Intel Core i7-1160G7 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 1200.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.10 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | Intel BGA 1598 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Comet Lake-H | Tiger Lake-U |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not specified | 144 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3, DDR4 | LPDDR4X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 4, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics | Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2020-09-16 | 2020-09-01 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $426 |

| Part Number | SRK3X | SRK0E |

| Generation | Core i5 (Comet Lake-H) | Core i7 (Willow Cove-U) |