Intel Core i5-10200H vs Intel Core i7-10710U Comparison

The Intel Core i7-10710U and Intel Core i5-10200H are both 10th generation Comet Lake mobile processors, but they target different power and performance envelopes. The i7-10710U is a 25W U-series part with six cores, while the i5-10200H is a 45W H-series part with four cores. Despite the i5's higher base clock and TDP, the recorded benchmark data shows the i7 winning every Cinebench test in the head-to-head comparison, with a consistent lead of roughly 14.4% across multi-core and single-core workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-10710U scores 783 against 684 for the i5-10200H, a 14.5% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows 110 versus 96, a 14.6% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i7 posts 3265 multi-core and 460 single-core, while the i5 manages 2853 and 402, respectively, both deltas at 14.4%. Cinebench R23 follows the same pattern: 7774 versus 6795 in multi-core and 1097 versus 959 in single-core, again a 14.4% gap. Every recorded Cinebench test favors the i7, and the margin is remarkably uniform, suggesting a consistent architectural or configuration advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The average benchmark score in the database reinforces this. The i7-10710U holds an average score of 2248, while the i5-10200H sits at 2154. Both processors land at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they occupy a similar overall performance tier, but the i7 is clearly ahead within that tier. The i7's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 (2246, +0.1%), the Intel Core i5-9400 (2254, -0.3%), and the Intel Xeon D-1715TER (2238, +0.5%). The i5-10200H's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-5950HQ (2158, -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X (2148, +0.3%), and the Intel Core i5-7640X (2167, -0.6%). These comparisons show that the i7's average score is slightly above its closest competitors, while the i5's average is slightly below its own nearest rivals, though the differences are small.

The i7's win is not just about core count. It also leads in single-core tests, which suggests that its higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to 4.10 GHz for the i5, plays a role. The i5 has a much higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 1.10 GHz), but that does not translate into a benchmark win. The i7's lower TDP (25W versus 45W) makes its performance lead even more notable, as it achieves higher scores while drawing less power on paper.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The i7-10710U wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 783 in R15, 3265 in R20, and 7774 in R23, while the i5-10200H scores 684, 2853, and 6795, respectively. The delta is 14.4% in each case.

Q: Does the i5-10200H have any advantage over the i7-10710U?

A: Yes. The i5 has a higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 1.10 GHz) and a higher TDP (45W versus 25W). It is also still in active production, while the i7 is end-of-life. Additionally, the i5 lists dual-channel memory with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 3 support, specifications that are not recorded for the i7.

Q: Which CPU has more cache?

A: The i7-10710U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-10200H has 6 MB. Both have 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core.

Q: Are they compatible with the same motherboards?

A: Both use the Intel BGA 1440 socket, so they are physically compatible with the same socket type.

Q: What about integrated graphics?

A: Both processors include UHD Graphics, so there is no difference in that regard.

Q: Which one is newer?

A: The i5-10200H was released on 2020-09-16, while the i7-10710U was released on 2019-08-20. The i5 is the newer part.

Architecture Differences

Both CPUs are built on Intel's 14 nm process and use the Comet Lake architecture, but they belong to different sub-families. The i7-10710U is a Comet Lake-U part, while the i5-10200H is a Comet Lake-H part. The U-series is designed for lower power consumption, which is reflected in the 25W TDP, while the H-series targets higher performance with a 45W TDP. The core and thread counts differ: the i7 has 6 cores and 12 threads, the i5 has 4 cores and 8 threads. This directly impacts multi-threaded performance.

Cache hierarchy also differs. The i7 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 6 MB found on the i5. Both have the same per-core L1 and L2 sizes. The i7's larger L3 cache likely contributes to its consistent lead in both multi-core and single-core tests, as it can hold more working data.

Memory support is listed as DDR3 and DDR4 for both, but the i5-10200H explicitly records dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the i7 does not have a memory bus or bandwidth specification in the database. Similarly, the i5 lists PCIe Gen 3 support, while the i7 does not list any PCIe version. These differences suggest that the i5 is a more fully specified part, possibly aimed at systems that need documented memory and expansion capabilities.

The i7-10710U is marked as end-of-life, while the i5-10200H is active. The i5 also has a part number (SRK3X), while the i7 does not have a recorded part number. The release dates differ by over a year, with the i7 launching in August 2019 and the i5 in September 2020.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: i7-10710U has 6, i5-10200H has 4.
• Threads: i7-10710U has 12, i5-10200H has 8.
• Base clock: i7-10710U is 1.10 GHz, i5-10200H is 2.40 GHz.
• Boost clock: i7-10710U is 4.70 GHz, i5-10200H is 4.10 GHz.
• TDP: i7-10710U is 25W, i5-10200H is 45W.
• L3 cache: i7-10710U has 12 MB shared, i5-10200H has 6 MB shared.
• Memory bus: i5-10200H lists dual-channel, i7-10710U does not list a memory bus.
• Memory bandwidth: i5-10200H lists 46.9 GB/s, i7-10710U does not list a bandwidth.
• PCIe: i5-10200H lists Gen 3, i7-10710U does not list PCIe.
• Part number: i5-10200H has SRK3X, i7-10710U has none.
• Production status: i7-10710U is end-of-life, i5-10200H is active.
• Release date: i7-10710U is 2019-08-20, i5-10200H is 2020-09-16.

All other recorded specifications, including socket, architecture, process node, foundry, L1 and L2 cache sizes, memory support type, ECC support, integrated graphics, market segment, and multiplier lock status, are identical.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the i7-10710U wins every Cinebench test, both multi-core and single-core. That makes it the clear choice for CPU-bound rendering and single-threaded tasks that rely on Cinebench-style workloads. Its 14.4% lead is consistent across all three Cinebench versions, indicating a robust performance advantage.

The i5-10200H, however, has its own strengths. It is a newer, active part, which means it is still available for new designs. Its higher base clock (2.40 GHz) and higher TDP (45W) suggest it may sustain heavy loads for longer periods, though the benchmark data does not show a performance win. The i5 also has documented dual-channel memory and PCIe Gen 3 support, which could be important for systems that need those features. Additionally, the i5 has Geekbench scores recorded: 4096 multi-core and 1347 single-core. The i7 does not have Geekbench scores in the database, so no direct comparison is possible, but these numbers give the i5 a separate performance data point.

In terms of power efficiency, the i7's 25W TDP is half the i5's 45W, yet it delivers higher Cinebench scores. This makes the i7 more attractive for thin-and-light laptops or any system where thermal and power budgets are tight. The i5's higher TDP may be better suited for larger chassis with more robust cooling, but the performance data does not show a corresponding benefit.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-10710U as the stronger processor in Cinebench workloads. It wins all six head-to-head tests with a consistent 14.4% margin, and its average benchmark score of 2248 is higher than the i5's 2154. The i7 achieves this with a lower TDP and a larger L3 cache, making it a compelling option for performance-focused mobile systems that do not need the i5's specific features.

The Intel Core i5-10200H, on the other hand, is the newer and still-active part. It offers a higher base clock, dual-channel memory with a specified bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 3 support, none of which are recorded for the i7. For system builders who require those documented specifications or who need a currently produced chip, the i5 is the practical choice. Its Geekbench scores provide additional performance data, though they cannot be compared directly to the i7.

In short, if raw Cinebench performance and power efficiency are the priorities, the i7-10710U is the winner. If availability, newer release date, and explicit memory and PCIe specifications matter more, the i5-10200H is the appropriate pick. The benchmark results are clear, but the final decision depends on which features beyond raw compute are essential for the target system.