Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i5-1035G4 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a consistent pattern across every Cinebench iteration: the Intel Core i5-1035G4 wins all six head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core i3-9100F. The margin is remarkably uniform, hovering between 12.9% and 13.8% depending on the specific test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-1035G4 scores 648 against the i3-9100F's 574, a 12.9% advantage. The single-core R15 result is similar, with the i5-1035G4 at 91 versus 80, a 13.8% edge. The pattern continues in Cinebench R20, where the multicore score of 2703 for the i5-1035G4 beats 2392 for the i3-9100F by 13%, and the single-core score of 381 beats 337 by 13.1%. Cinebench R23 shows the same story: the i5-1035G4 posts 6436 multicore against 5697 for the i3-9100F, a 13% lead, while the single-core result of 908 versus 804 represents a 12.9% gain. The i3-9100F records zero wins in this dataset, while the i5-1035G4 takes all six.

The average benchmark scores in the database place these two processors in nearly the same overall tier. The i5-1035G4 has an average benchmark score of 1861, while the i3-9100F averages 1903. This places the i5-1035G4 at the 42nd percentile of all CPUs, and the i3-9100F at the 43rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the i5-1035G4 include the Intel Core i3-9350K at 1867 (0.3% higher), the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 at 1869 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i5-7600 at 1844 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 at 1879 (0.9% higher). For the i3-9100F, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 3 5125C at 1902 (0.1% higher), the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 at 1907 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4 at 1908 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE at 1910 (0.4% higher). The head-to-head deltas are therefore more decisive than the average-score comparison might suggest. The i5-1035G4's wins are consistent across all recorded Cinebench workloads, indicating a systematic advantage rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows that the i5-1035G4 wins in every recorded benchmark category. The largest delta is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the i5-1035G4 leads by 13.8%. The smallest delta is 12.9%, appearing in both Cinebench R15 multicore and Cinebench R23 single-core. The multicore and single-core deltas are nearly identical across all three Cinebench versions, which suggests that the i5-1035G4's advantage is not tied to thread scaling but rather to per-thread efficiency. The i5-1035G4 has 8 threads versus 4 for the i3-9100F, yet the multicore advantage is not significantly larger than the single-core advantage. This indicates that the i5-1035G4's higher thread count contributes to its lead, but the single-core performance gap is the dominant factor.

For users running Cinebench-style workloads, the i5-1035G4 is the clear choice regardless of whether the workload is single-threaded or multi-threaded. The i3-9100F offers no recorded benchmark win, so there is no scenario in the database where it outperforms the i5-1035G4. The i3-9100F does have a higher boost clock (4.20 GHz versus 3.70 GHz for the i5-1035G4), but the recorded scores show that this clock advantage does not translate into performance superiority. The i5-1035G4's architecture appears to deliver more work per clock cycle in these tests. The i3-9100F also lacks integrated graphics, while the i5-1035G4 includes Iris Plus graphics. This means the i5-1035G4 can handle display output without a discrete GPU, which is a functional advantage for mobile systems. The i3-9100F is a desktop part with no integrated graphics, requiring a separate graphics card for any display output.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different Intel architectures and market segments. The i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake architecture with the Ice Lake-U codename, built on a 10 nm process node. The i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake architecture with the Coffee Lake codename, built on a 14 nm process node. The i5-1035G4 is part of the Core i5 generation with Sunny Cove-U microarchitecture, while the i3-9100F is part of the Core i3 generation with Coffee Lake Refresh microarchitecture. The die sizes are similar, with the i5-1035G4 at 123 mm² and the i3-9100F at 126 mm². Both have 4 physical cores, but the i5-1035G4 supports 8 threads through Hyper-Threading, while the i3-9100F has only 4 threads. The cache configuration differs in L1: the i5-1035G4 has 80 KB of L1 per core, while the i3-9100F has 64 KB per core. Both have 256 KB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

The i5-1035G4 has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz, while the i3-9100F has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) differs substantially: the i5-1035G4 is rated at 15 watts, while the i3-9100F is rated at 65 watts. This reflects their different market segments: the i5-1035G4 is a mobile processor on the Intel BGA 1526 socket, while the i3-9100F is a desktop processor on the Intel Socket 1151. The memory bandwidth also differs, with the i5-1035G4 supporting 51.2 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s for the i3-9100F. Both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The i5-1035G4 does not support ECC memory, while the i3-9100F does support ECC. Both use PCIe Gen 3, but the i3-9100F specifies 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-1035G4 does not specify a lane count in the database.

The i5-1035G4 includes Iris Plus integrated graphics, while the i3-9100F has no integrated graphics. The production status differs as well: the i5-1035G4 is listed as Active, while the i3-9100F is listed as End-of-life. The release dates are close, with the i5-1035G4 released on 2019-07-31 and the i3-9100F released on 2019-04-22. The part numbers are SRGKK for the i5-1035G4 and SRF6NSRF7W for the i3-9100F. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The i3-9100F has a launch MSRP of $122, while the i5-1035G4 has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-1035G4 scores 908 in Cinebench R23 single-core, compared to 804 for the Intel Core i3-9100F, a 12.9% advantage.

Q: Does the i3-9100F outperform the i5-1035G4 in any recorded benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the i5-1035G4 winning all six Cinebench tests, with the i3-9100F recording zero wins.

Q: What is the thread count difference between these two processors?

A: The i5-1035G4 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the i3-9100F has 4 cores and 4 threads. The i5-1035G4 supports Hyper-Threading, while the i3-9100F does not.

Q: Do these processors use the same process node?

A: No. The i5-1035G4 is built on a 10 nm process, while the i3-9100F is built on a 14 nm process.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The i5-1035G4 includes Iris Plus integrated graphics. The i3-9100F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The i5-1035G4 is rated at 15 watts, while the i3-9100F is rated at 65 watts.

The Verdict

The data points to the i5-1035G4 as the superior performer in every recorded Cinebench workload. The deltas range from 12.9% to 13.8%, which is a meaningful margin in single-threaded and multi-threaded tests alike. The i3-9100F offers a higher boost clock at 4.20 GHz versus 3.70 GHz, and it supports ECC memory, but neither advantage appears in the benchmark results. The i3-9100F also carries a launch MSRP of $122, while the i5-1035G4 has no recorded MSRP.

For users who prioritize the recorded benchmark scores, the i5-1035G4 is the clear choice. It delivers consistent wins across all Cinebench versions, includes integrated graphics for systems without a discrete GPU, and operates at a much lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts. The i5-1035G4 is a mobile part with an active production status, while the i3-9100F is a desktop part that is end-of-life. The i3-9100F may still be relevant for users who require ECC memory support or who need a desktop socket 1151 processor, but the benchmark data does not favor it in any measured workload. The i5-1035G4's 8 threads versus 4 threads, combined with its per-core efficiency, gives it a decisive edge in the database's Cinebench results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Core i3-9100F |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 1.10 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.70 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1526 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Ice Lake | Coffee Lake |

| Codename | Ice Lake-U | Coffee Lake |

| Generation | Core i5 (Sunny Cove-U) | Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | 126 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2019-07-31 | 2019-04-22 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $122 |

| Part Number | SRGKK | SRF6NSRF7W |