Intel Core i3-8300T vs Intel Core i7-1060G7 Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1060G7 and Intel Core i3-8300T are both quad-core Intel processors, but they are engineered for entirely different environments. The i7-1060G7 is a 9-watt mobile part built on Ice Lake, while the i3-8300T is a 35-watt desktop chip from the Coffee Lake generation. Benchmark results show a consistent performance gap favoring the mobile i7 across all tested workloads, yet the two chips land within 0.3% of each other in average benchmark score, making the comparison a study in efficiency versus raw architectural advantage.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1060G7 wins every single benchmark included in the head-to-head comparison. Across six Cinebench tests, the i7-1060G7 holds a decisive advantage, with delta percentages ranging from 18.1% to 18.2% over the i3-8300T. This is not a marginal victory; it is a systematic outperformance in both single-core and multi-core scenarios. The i7-1060G7’s strength lies in its newer Sunny Cove architecture and its ability to process eight threads simultaneously, whereas the i3-8300T is limited to four threads.

The Intel Core i3-8300T does not win any of the six head-to-head benchmarks, but it does hold its own in the broader average score comparison. Its average benchmark score of 1586 is only 0.3% lower than the i7-1060G7’s 1591, which suggests that in mixed workloads or when considering a wider benchmark suite, the two chips are closer than the Cinebench results imply. The i3-8300T also carries the advantage of being a desktop part with a 38.4 GB/s memory bandwidth figure, which may help in memory-sensitive tasks, though no direct benchmark in the data confirms this.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-1060G7 consistently outperforms the i3-8300T in multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-1060G7 scores 5500 against 4656 for the i3-8300T, a delta of 18.1%.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the i3-8300T comes out ahead?

A: No. In the six head-to-head Cinebench tests, the i3-8300T wins zero. The closest margin is still a 18.1% gap in favor of the i7-1060G7.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-core performance?

A: The i7-1060G7 leads in every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 776 versus 657 for the i3-8300T, which is an 18.1% advantage.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The i7-1060G7 has an average benchmark score of 1591, while the i3-8300T sits at 1586. The i7-1060G7 leads by 0.3%.

Q: Does the i3-8300T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i3-8300T lists ECC memory support as true, whereas the i7-1060G7 does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The i3-8300T has a base clock of 3.20 GHz, which is significantly higher than the i7-1060G7’s 1.00 GHz base clock. However, the i7-1060G7 boosts to 3.80 GHz.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows a uniform pattern: the i7-1060G7 wins every test by nearly the same margin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-1060G7 scores 554 against the i3-8300T’s 469, an 18.1% difference. The single-core R15 test tells a similar story: 78 versus 66, an 18.2% delta. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i7-1060G7 again leads multi-core with 2310 against 1955, and single-core with 325 against 275, both at 18.2% deltas.

The largest absolute gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the i7-1060G7 scores 5500 and the i3-8300T scores 4656. That 844-point gap translates to an 18.1% advantage. The single-core R23 test shows 776 versus 657, also an 18.1% delta. Notably, the i3-8300T has additional Geekbench scores (3436 multi-core, 1171 single-core) that are not part of the head-to-head set, so those cannot be directly compared here. Overall, the i7-1060G7’s wins are consistent and substantial, with no test showing less than an 18.1% margin.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge sharply on core specifications. The i7-1060G7 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the i3-8300T has 4 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks differ dramatically: the i7-1060G7 runs at 1.00 GHz with a boost of 3.80 GHz, whereas the i3-8300T has a 3.20 GHz base clock and no listed boost clock. Thermal design power is another major split: the i7-1060G7 draws 9 watts, compared to 35 watts for the i3-8300T.

The sockets are incompatible: the i7-1060G7 uses Intel BGA 1440, while the i3-8300T uses Intel Socket 1151. Memory bus configuration also differs, with the i7-1060G7 supporting quad-channel DDR4 and the i3-8300T supporting dual-channel DDR4. The i3-8300T lists a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the i7-1060G7 does not have a listed figure. ECC memory support is true for the i3-8300T but false for the i7-1060G7. PCIe configurations differ as well: the i7-1060G7 lists Gen 3 without a lane count, while the i3-8300T lists Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The i3-8300T also has a launch MSRP of $138 and a part number of SR3Y1, while the i7-1060G7 has neither listed.

Architecture Differences

The i7-1060G7 is built on Ice Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, with a die size of 123 mm². Its generation is listed as Core i7 (Sunny Cove-Y). The i3-8300T, by contrast, uses Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process, with a die size of 126 mm², and belongs to the Core i3 (Coffee Lake) generation. Both chips have 8 MB of shared L3 cache, but the L1 cache differs: the i7-1060G7 has 80 KB per core, while the i3-8300T has 64 KB per core. L2 cache is identical at 256 KB per core.

Integrated graphics also differ. The i7-1060G7 pairs with Iris Plus graphics, while the i3-8300T uses UHD Graphics 630. The i7-1060G7 is marked as a Mobile segment part with active production status and a release date of 2019-07-31. The i3-8300T is a Desktop part that is end-of-life, released on 2018-04-01. The i7-1060G7’s Sunny Cove microarchitecture brings a newer design, which likely explains its performance advantage despite a much lower power envelope.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for users prioritizing raw multi-threaded and single-threaded performance: the Intel Core i7-1060G7. It leads in all six Cinebench tests, with margins of at least 18.1%, and it does so while consuming only 9 watts of power. Its 8 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel workloads, and its 10 nm process and Ice Lake architecture deliver higher scores per clock. For any workload represented by Cinebench, the i7-1060G7 is the stronger processor.

The Intel Core i3-8300T, however, is not without merit. Its average benchmark score of 1586 is nearly identical to the i7-1060G7’s 1591, with a delta of only 0.3%. It offers ECC memory support, a feature absent on the i7-1060G7, and it has a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz, which may appeal in scenarios where sustained low-frequency operation is not a priority. Its desktop socket and 16 PCIe lanes also make it a more conventional platform choice for desktop builds, and its launch MSRP of $138 provides a reference point for its market positioning.

Ultimately, the i7-1060G7 is the better performer in every measured benchmark, with an 18.1% to 18.2% edge across the board. The i3-8300T is the better option only if ECC memory support, a desktop socket, or a higher base clock are the deciding factors, since its benchmark scores trail in all direct comparisons. The i7-1060G7’s 39th percentile ranking among all CPUs matches the i3-8300T’s 39th percentile, but the head-to-head data shows that within this pair, the mobile part is the clear winner.