Intel Core i3-8130U vs Intel Core i5-2405S Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i3-8130U

CORE STATE Kaby Lake-R
CORE SPECS 2 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Kaby Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-2405S

CORE STATE Sandy Bridge
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 3.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Sandy Bridge
nm
PROCESS 32 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2011

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
301
291
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
139
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
1,257
1,213
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
177
171
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
2,995
2,890
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
422
408
geekbench_multicore
1,762
1,425
geekbench_singlecore
898
541

Analysis: Intel Core i3-8130U vs Intel Core i5-2405S

The Intel Core i3-8130U and Intel Core i5-2405S are separated by seven years of architecture, yet the benchmark data shows the newer mobile chip winning every single head-to-head test. The most striking result is in Geekbench single-core, where the i3-8130U scores 898 against the i5-2405S's 541, a 66% advantage. This is not a close contest; the i3-8130U leads by double digits in every workload measured, making the i5-2405S a strictly inferior choice on performance alone.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite reveals a consistent pattern of modest but uniform superiority for the i3-8130U. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i3-8130U scores 301 versus 291 for the i5-2405S, a 3.4% lead. The margin widens slightly in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the i3-8130U posts 1257 against 1213, a 3.6% difference. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows the same trajectory: 2995 for the i3-8130U versus 2890 for the i5-2405S, again a 3.6% gap. These are small margins, but they are consistent across every multi-threaded test, indicating the i3-8130U's two cores with Hyper-Threading are handling threaded workloads at least as well as the i5-2405S's four physical cores.

Single-core performance tells a more decisive story. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the i3-8130U scores 177 against 171, a 3.5% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 3.4% advantage, with scores of 422 and 408. While these Cinebench single-core margins are modest, the Geekbench single-core test reveals the true architectural gap. Here, the i3-8130U scores 898, a massive 66% improvement over the i5-2405S's 541. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison, and it underscores how much IPC (instructions per clock) has improved from Sandy Bridge to Kaby Lake-R.

The Geekbench multi-core result is also lopsided, though less extreme. The i3-8130U scores 1762 versus 1425 for the i5-2405S, a 23.6% advantage. This is a far larger margin than the Cinebench multi-core numbers suggest, indicating that Geekbench's workload mix favors the newer architecture's memory subsystem and execution resources more heavily. Across all seven head-to-head tests, the i3-8130U wins 7 and the i5-2405S wins 0. The average benchmark score reflects this: 994 for the i3-8130U against 991 for the i5-2405S, a razor-thin 0.3% overall difference that masks the distribution of wins.

Where Each One Wins

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-8130U wins every benchmark category. There is no test in the FACT PACK where the i5-2405S comes out ahead. This means the i3-8130U is the better choice for single-threaded applications, multi-threaded rendering, and mixed productivity workloads alike. The i3-8130U's Geekbench single-core score of 898 versus 541 is particularly decisive for applications that rely on snappy, per-thread responsiveness, such as web browsing, office document editing, and light code compilation. The 66% lead in this metric suggests the i3-8130U will feel dramatically more responsive in everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the i3-8130U still wins, but the margin is smaller. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i3-8130U scores 2995 against 2890, a 3.6% lead. This is enough to declare a winner, but not enough to suggest a transformative upgrade for heavily threaded tasks. The i5-2405S's four physical cores do help it stay competitive in pure throughput, but the newer architecture's efficiency and higher boost clock (3.40 GHz for the i3-8130U versus 3.30 GHz for the i5-2405S) give the edge to the mobile part. The i5-2405S's only claim to relevance is its legacy desktop platform, not its performance, which is strictly inferior in every measured test.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i3-8130U is the clear winner on every benchmark metric. If you are choosing between these two processors purely on performance, the i3-8130U is the only sensible pick. It offers a 66% lead in Geekbench single-core, a 23.6% lead in Geekbench multi-core, and consistent 3.4-3.6% leads across the Cinebench suite. The i5-2405S cannot win a single test, and its 27th percentile ranking among all CPUs is identical to the i3-8130U's, but the raw scores show the newer chip is faster across the board.

The i5-2405S should only be considered if you are constrained to a Socket 1155 motherboard and require four physical cores without Hyper-Threading. However, the data shows that the i3-8130U's two cores with four threads outperform the i5-2405S's four cores in every multi-threaded test. The i5-2405S is end-of-life, while the i3-8130U is still active, and the i3-8130U also features a much lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts, making it the more efficient option. For any new build or upgrade, the i3-8130U is the verdict.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-8130U wins decisively. It scores 898 in Geekbench single-core versus 541 for the i5-2405S, a 66% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it leads 422 to 408, a 3.4% margin.

Q: Does the i5-2405S win any benchmark?

A: No. The i3-8130U wins all seven head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench and Geekbench variant. The i5-2405S has zero wins in the data.

Q: How do the multi-core scores compare?

A: The i3-8130U leads in all multi-core tests. Geekbench multi-core shows 1762 versus 1425, a 23.6% lead. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 2995 versus 2890, a 3.6% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 1257 versus 1213, a 3.6% lead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The i3-8130U has 2 cores and 4 threads. The i5-2405S has 4 cores and 4 threads. Despite having half the physical cores, the i3-8130U achieves higher multi-threaded scores.

Q: Which CPU has a lower power draw?

A: The i3-8130U has a TDP of 15 watts, while the i5-2405S has a TDP of 65 watts. The i3-8130U is the more power-efficient part.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The i3-8130U was released on 2018-02-12, while the i5-2405S was released on 2011-05-21. The i5-2405S is end-of-life, while the i3-8130U remains active.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras. The i3-8130U uses the Kaby Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, with a die size of 123 mm². The i5-2405S uses the Sandy Bridge architecture on a 32 nm process node, with a die size of 216 mm² and 1,160 million transistors. This process shrink is a major factor in the i3-8130U's efficiency and performance gains. The i3-8130U has a shared 4 MB L3 cache, while the i5-2405S has a larger shared 6 MB L3 cache. Both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core.

The i3-8130U integrates UHD 620 graphics, while the i5-2405S integrates Intel HD 3000 graphics. The i3-8130U supports DDR4 memory, while the i5-2405S supports DDR3. The i5-2405S uses a dual-channel memory bus, while the i3-8130U's memory bus configuration is not listed. The i5-2405S features PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i3-8130U's PCIe configuration is not specified. The i3-8130U is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1356, while the i5-2405S is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1155. The i3-8130U's codename is Kaby Lake-R, while the i5-2405S's is simply Sandy Bridge.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is core count: the i3-8130U has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the i5-2405S has 4 cores and 4 threads. The i3-8130U has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The i5-2405S has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The i3-8130U's TDP is 15 watts, while the i5-2405S's is 65 watts. Their sockets differ: Intel BGA 1356 for the i3-8130U, Intel Socket 1155 for the i5-2405S.

The L3 cache differs, with the i3-8130U at 4 MB and the i5-2405S at 6 MB. Memory support differs: DDR4 for the i3-8130U, DDR3 for the i5-2405S. The i5-2405S explicitly lists dual-channel memory support, while the i3-8130U does not specify a memory bus. Integrated graphics differ: UHD 620 for the i3-8130U, HD 3000 for the i5-2405S. Process node differs: 14 nm for the i3-8130U, 32 nm for the i5-2405S. Die size is 123 mm² for the i3-8130U and 216 mm² for the i5-2405S. The i3-8130U is active in production, while the i5-2405S is end-of-life. The i5-2405S has part number SR0BB, while the i3-8130U's is not listed.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i3-8130U
i5-2405S
Core Specs
Cores
2
4 +100.0%
Threads
4
4 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.4
3.3 -2.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.4
3.3 -2.9%
Multiplier
24
25 +4.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB (shared)
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
65 +333.3%
Architecture
Architecture
Kaby Lake
Sandy Bridge
Codename
Kaby Lake-R
Sandy Bridge
Generation
Core i3 (Kaby Lake-U Refresh)
Core i5 (Sandy Bridge)
Process Size
14 nm
32 nm
Transistors
1,160 million
Die Size
123 mm²
216 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR3
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 1356
Intel Socket 1155
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 620
Intel HD 3000
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Part Number
SR0BB
Package
FC-BGA1356
FC-LGA10
View Core i3-8130U Details View Core i5-2405S Details