Intel Core i3-4360 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5620 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear pattern: the Intel Pentium Gold G5620 wins every recorded comparison against the Intel Core i3-4360. Across five Cinebench tests, the G5620 maintains a lead that hovers consistently around 17%, which suggests a systematic performance advantage rather than workload-specific variation.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the G5620 scores 364 against the i3-4360's 310, a 17.4% advantage. This test stresses both cores simultaneously, and the result indicates the G5620's higher base clock of 4.00 GHz versus 3.70 GHz translates directly into throughput. The single-core R15 test is not present for the i3-4360 in the database, but the R20 and R23 single-core results fill that gap.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core gap is 17.2% (1517 versus 1294), while single-core shows a 17.6% delta (214 versus 182). The single-core margin is slightly larger than the multi-core margin, which is interesting. It implies that the G5620's clock advantage is not the only factor at play; architectural efficiency from the newer Coffee Lake design likely contributes to the per-thread gains.

Cinebench R23 repeats the pattern almost exactly. Multi-core: 3613 versus 3082, a 17.2% delta. Single-core: 510 versus 435, also 17.2%. The consistency across R20 and R23 is striking. These are different rendering workloads with different scaling characteristics, yet the relative performance ratio barely moves. This stability suggests the G5620's advantage is fundamental to the CPU's design, not an artifact of a specific benchmark.

The wins tally is decisive: 5 wins for the G5620, 0 for the i3-4360. No benchmark in the head-to-head set favors the older Haswell part. The closest margin is still a comfortable 17.2%, meaning there is no scenario in the recorded data where the i3-4360 comes within striking distance.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmarks, the Intel Pentium Gold G5620 wins in every category measured. There is no test in the head-to-head set where the Intel Core i3-4360 takes the lead. This includes both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, as well as different Cinebench versions that stress the CPU in slightly different ways.

For single-core performance, which often dictates responsiveness in lightly threaded applications, the G5620 leads by 17.6% in R20 and 17.2% in R23. The i3-4360's single-core scores of 182 (R20) and 435 (R23) are respectable for its era, but they do not match the G5620's 214 and 510. If a user prioritizes tasks that rely on one or two threads, such as older games or certain productivity tools, the data clearly favors the G5620.

For multi-core performance, the G5620 leads by 17.4% in R15, 17.2% in R20, and 17.2% in R23. Both CPUs have 2 cores and 4 threads, so this is not a case of one part having more parallel resources. The advantage comes purely from clock speed and architectural efficiency. Rendering, video encoding, and compilation workloads that scale across threads will finish noticeably faster on the G5620.

The i3-4360 does not have a single recorded win in any benchmark category. Its average benchmark score of 1061 is actually slightly higher than the G5620's 1045, but this is misleading. The average includes all benchmarks in the database, not just the head-to-head set, and the i3-4360's rivals list includes different CPUs entirely. Within the direct comparisons, the G5620 is the consistent winner.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from different architectural eras. The Intel Pentium Gold G5620 is built on Coffee Lake using a 14 nm process, while the Intel Core i3-4360 is Haswell on a 22 nm process. This node difference is significant: the newer 14 nm process allows for higher clock speeds at the same 54 W TDP. Both parts are locked, so users cannot overclock to close the gap.

The G5620 uses the Intel Socket 1151 platform, while the i3-4360 uses Intel Socket 1150. This means they are not interchangeable in a motherboard. A system built for one cannot accept the other without a platform change. The G5620 supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The i3-4360 supports DDR3, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database.

Cache configuration is identical on paper: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3. However, the physical implementation differs due to the architectural generation. Coffee Lake's cache hierarchy is more efficient at lower latencies, which partially explains the single-core performance gap despite the relatively modest clock difference.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The G5620 packs UHD Graphics 630, while the i3-4360 has Intel HD 4600. Neither is a gaming powerhouse, but the newer UHD 630 supports more modern display outputs and media decoding features. The G5620 also supports ECC memory, which the i3-4360 does not. This makes the Pentium Gold potentially more suitable for entry-level server or workstation builds where error correction is desirable.

The G5620's die size is 126 mm², while the i3-4360 is larger at 177 mm². The i3-4360 also has a recorded transistor count of 1,400 million, while the G5620's transistor count is not listed. The smaller die on a newer process explains why the G5620 can achieve higher clocks within the same TDP envelope. The i3-4360's larger, older die requires more area to deliver lower performance.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Pentium Gold G5620 outperforms the Intel Core i3-4360 in every recorded benchmark. The margins are consistent, ranging from 17.2% to 17.6%, which indicates a uniform advantage across both single-core and multi-core workloads. For anyone choosing between these two based solely on the database measurements, the G5620 is the faster part.

The i3-4360's only saving grace is its slightly higher average benchmark score of 1061 versus 1045, but this figure is pulled from different benchmark sets and rival comparisons. In direct head-to-head tests, it never wins. The G5620's 4.00 GHz base clock versus 3.70 GHz is a clear factor, but the architectural improvements from Coffee Lake over Haswell likely contribute as well.

Users with an existing Socket 1150 motherboard might be tempted to stick with the i3-4360, but the data shows they would be leaving performance on the table. The G5620 also supports newer DDR4 memory and ECC, adding functional advantages beyond raw speed. The i3-4360's lack of ECC support and older DDR3 memory interface are notable drawbacks in the recorded specifications.

The G5620 was released in 2019 with a launch MSRP of $93, while the i3-4360 came out in 2014 with no recorded launch price. The newer part is not only faster but also brings platform advantages. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Pentium Gold G5620 is the superior processor in every measurable way.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Pentium Gold G5620 has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4360 runs at 3.70 GHz.

Q: Do both CPUs have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in the head-to-head tests?

A: The largest margin is in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the G5620 leads by 17.6% (214 versus 182).

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Pentium Gold G5620 supports ECC memory; the Intel Core i3-4360 does not.

Q: What memory types do the two CPUs support?

A: The G5620 supports DDR4, while the i3-4360 supports DDR3. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Are the two CPUs compatible with the same motherboard socket?

A: No, the G5620 uses Intel Socket 1151, and the i3-4360 uses Intel Socket 1150.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Pentium Gold G5620 | Intel Core i3-4360 |

|---|---|---|

| Base clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Haswell |

| Process node | 14 nm | 22 nm |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 1,400 million |

| Die size | 126 mm² | 177 mm² |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD 4600 |

| Release date | 2019-02-19 | 2014-04-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $93 | Not recorded |

| Part number | SR3YC | Not recorded |

| Production status | End-of-life | Not recorded |