Intel Core i3-4350 vs Intel Processor N95 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits the two processors along clear lines. The Intel Processor N95 takes the majority of the recorded wins, claiming victory in two of the three head-to-head comparisons. Its strongest territory is single-threaded performance, where it dominates the Core i3-4350 by a massive margin. The N95 also wins decisively in the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test.

The Intel Core i3-4350, despite losing the overall win count, secures the most important modern multi-core result. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the older Haswell part pulls ahead of the N95. This is the only test in the shared benchmark set where the Core i3 wins, but it is a significant one for users running current rendering workloads.

Breaking down the wins by workload type, the N95 excels in short-burst single-thread tasks and older multi-core rendering. The Core i3-4350 wins in sustained multi-core rendering in the newer Cinebench version. The N95 shows a 44% advantage in Cinebench R15 multi-core, scoring 445 against 309. However, in the more demanding Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Core i3-4350 rebounds with a 10% lead.

For users prioritizing single-core speed, the N95 is the clear winner. The N95 posts 914 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 434 for the Core i3-4350. For users prioritizing sustained multi-core rendering in newer benchmarks, the Core i3-4350 takes the edge.

The data suggests the N95 is optimized for responsiveness in single-thread workloads and older multi-core tests, while the Core i3-4350 is better suited for newer multi-core rendering workloads. The Core i3-4350's win in Cinebench R23 multi-core gives it relevance in modern multi-threaded applications, even though it loses the other comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use fundamentally different designs. The Intel Processor N95 uses the Gracemont architecture, part of the Alder Lake-N generation, built on a 10 nm process node. The Intel Core i3-4350 uses the older Haswell architecture, a Core i3 from the Haswell generation, built on a 22 nm process node. The N95 is the more recent release, dated 2023-01-02, while the Core i3-4350 launched on 2014-04-30.

Core counts differ. The N95 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Core i3-4350 has 2 cores and 4 threads, relying on Hyper-Threading to match the thread count. Clock speeds tell a different story. The N95 has a base clock listed as 100.00 and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The Core i3-4350 has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and no boost clock, so it runs at a fixed frequency. The higher base clock of the Core i3 helps it in some sustained workloads.

Cache configurations are notably different. The N95 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i3-4350 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The N95 has a larger total L3 cache, which helps in some memory-heavy tasks.

Process node differences are stark: the N95 uses 10 nm, while the Core i3-4350 uses 22 nm. The Core i3-4350 has published transistor and die size figures: 1,400 million transistors and a 177 mm² die size. The N95 does not have these figures listed.

Memory support differs completely. The N95 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a single-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Core i3-4350 supports only DDR3 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and no listed memory bandwidth. The N95 has PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i3-4350 has PCIe Gen 3 without a lane count specified.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The N95 has UHD Graphics 710, while the Core i3-4350 has Intel HD 4600. The N95 is a mobile-market segment processor on Intel BGA 1264 socket. The Core i3-4350 is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1150. The N95 has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Core i3-4350 has a TDP of 54 watts. The N95 is listed as Active production status, while the Core i3-4350 has no production status listed. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data provides three direct comparisons. The Intel Processor N95 wins two, the Intel Core i3-4350 wins one.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the N95 scores 445 against 309 for the Core i3-4350. This is a 44% advantage for the N95, a substantial lead in this older rendering test.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the results flip. The Core i3-4350 scores 3076 against 2769 for the N95. The delta is -10% from the perspective of the N95, meaning the Core i3-4350 is 10% ahead. This is the only head-to-head win for the Core i3-4350.

In Cinebench R23 single-core, the N95 scores 914 against 434 for the Core i3-4350. This is a 110.6% advantage for the N95. The N95 more than doubles the single-core score of the Core i3-4350 in this test.

Looking at the full benchmark lists for each processor, there are additional data points. The N95 has a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 151, which is not directly compared in the head-to-head set. The Core i3-4350 has Cinebench R20 multi-core and single-core scores of 1291 and 182 respectively, also not in the head-to-head set. The N95's average benchmark score is 1070, while the Core i3-4350's is 1058. Both sit at the 29th percentile among all CPUs.

The N95's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-2820QM at a 0.1% difference, and the AMD Opteron 3380 and AMD Athlon X4 880K both at -0.1%. The Core i3-4350's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U at 0% difference, and the Intel Core i7-2760QM at 0.1%. The average scores are close: 1070 for the N95 versus 1058 for the Core i3-4350, a small gap of 12 points.

The single-core result is the most striking. A 110.6% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates the N95 has dramatically better per-thread performance. The Core i3-4350's higher base clock of 3.60 GHz does not compensate for the architectural advantage of the newer Gracemont design.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Processor N95 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Intel Core i3-4350 has 2 cores and 4 threads. Both have 4 threads, but the N95 has twice the physical core count.

Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Processor N95 wins decisively. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the N95 scores 914 versus 434 for the Core i3-4350, a 110.6% advantage.

Q: Is the Core i3-4350 faster in any benchmark?

A: Yes. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core i3-4350 scores 3076 versus 2769 for the N95, a 10% advantage. This is the only head-to-head test the Core i3-4350 wins.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Intel Processor N95 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a single-channel memory bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i3-4350 supports only DDR3 memory with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The Intel Processor N95 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel Core i3-4350 has a TDP of 54 watts. The N95 uses substantially less power.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Processor N95 and the Intel Core i3-4350 are at the 29th percentile among all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores are 1070 and 1058 respectively.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Processor N95 | Intel Core i3-4350 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 2 |

| Threads | 4 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 100.00 | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | None |

| TDP | 15 W | 54 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Gracemont | Haswell |

| Codename | Gracemont | Haswell |

| Generation | Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) | Core i3 (Haswell) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 22 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 1,400 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 177 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2023-01-02 | 2014-04-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

The Verdict

The Intel Processor N95 is the better choice for users who need strong single-threaded performance and energy efficiency. Its 110.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core makes it the clear pick for responsive, lightly threaded workloads. The N95 also wins in Cinebench R15 multi-core with a 44% advantage. Its 15 watt TDP versus 54 watts for the Core i3-4350 makes it dramatically more power-efficient, and its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives it a modern memory pathway.

The Intel Core i3-4350 is the better choice for users who prioritize sustained multi-core rendering in newer benchmarks. Its 10% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core shows that the older Haswell design still holds an advantage in that specific workload. The higher base clock of 3.60 GHz and dual-channel DDR3 memory support contribute to its performance in this area. However, its single-core performance is far behind, and its higher TDP makes it less efficient.

The data shows both processors occupy the same performance tier, with both at the 29th percentile and average benchmark scores of 1070 and 1058. The N95 edges ahead in overall average score by 12 points. The N95 is the more balanced processor, winning two of three head-to-head tests and offering better single-core performance, more cores, and lower power consumption. The Core i3-4350 retains a niche advantage in newer multi-core rendering only.

For a mobile or compact system, the N95 is the clear pick. For a desktop system where sustained multi-core rendering in Cinebench R23 is the primary task, the Core i3-4350 has the edge. The N95's modern architecture, larger cache, and newer process node make it the more future-proof option. The Core i3-4350's single win is real but narrow, and it comes with significant trade-offs in power consumption and single-thread speed.