AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

The Intel Core i3-14100T and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE are two 35W desktop processors aimed at compact and energy-efficient builds, both holding the 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs. Despite near-identical average benchmark scores—17,648 for the Intel part and 17,614 for the AMD—the data reveals distinct performance personalities. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE wins the majority of head-to-head tests, taking 12 of 17, while the Intel Core i3-14100T secures decisive victories in specific computational workloads, making the choice highly dependent on the intended application.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity appears in synthetic math and physics tests, where the Intel Core i3-14100T dominates. In PassMark's physics simulation, the Intel chip scores 973 against the AMD's 750, a commanding 29.7% lead. Similarly, floating-point math heavily favors Intel, with scores of 31,379 versus 24,681—a 27.1% advantage. Prime number finding also goes to Intel, scoring 56 compared to AMD's 44, a 27.3% margin. These results suggest Intel's architecture handles certain arithmetic and simulation workloads with significantly greater efficiency.

Intel also edges ahead in integer math, scoring 40,292 versus 39,163, a 2.9% win, and in PassMark's multithread test, where it scores 13,662 against 13,507, a 1.1% advantage. While these margins are slim, they contribute to Intel's overall average score of 17,648, which sits just 0.2% above AMD's 17,614. Interestingly, the closest rival to both is the Intel Core i3-13100F with an average score of 17,653, showing how tightly clustered these mid-range parts are.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE counters with a clean sweep across all Cinebench iterations. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 11,705 versus Intel's 11,612, a 0.8% edge; in single-core, AMD leads 1,652 to 1,639, also 0.8%. The pattern repeats in R20 (4,916 vs 4,877 multi-core; 693 vs 688 single-core) and R15 (1,179 vs 1,170 multi-core; 166 vs 165 single-core). These consistent, if narrow, wins indicate better sustained rendering performance.

AMD's largest victories come in specialized PassMark subtests. Random string sorting shows AMD at 18,010 versus Intel's 15,579, a 13.5% gap. Extended instructions favor AMD heavily, 11,923 to 10,414, a 12.7% lead. Data encryption shows AMD at 8,603 versus 7,881, an 8.4% advantage. Even data compression, a common productivity task, tilts to AMD at 155,164 versus 152,636, a 1.6% win. The single-thread PassMark score also belongs to AMD, 3,644 to 3,498, a 4% difference.

The Verdict

The benchmark data tells a clear story of workload-specific superiority. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better all-rounder, winning every Cinebench test and most PassMark subtests, including encryption, compression, string sorting, and extended instructions. Its average benchmark score of 17,614 places it within 0.2% of Intel, but its breadth of wins—12 out of 17—makes it the safer choice for mixed-use systems.

Users running Cinebench-style rendering, data compression, or encryption workloads should pick the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE. The data shows consistent single-digit percentage wins across those tests, and the 4% single-thread PassMark advantage suggests snappier everyday responsiveness. The 8300GE also offers a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz, both exceeding Intel's 2.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost.

The Intel Core i3-14100T is the specialist's pick. If the primary workload involves physics simulations, floating-point math, or prime-number calculations, Intel's 27-30% margins are too large to ignore. The 29.7% physics win and 27.1% floating-point win indicate an architecture that excels at these specific operations. Intel also holds a slight edge in integer math and multithread PassMark, making it viable for certain scientific or financial applications.

For pure gaming or general office work, neither chip shows a decisive advantage in the data, though AMD's higher single-thread scores (both Cinebench and PassMark) hint at better frame pacing. The AMD part's 8 MB of L3 cache versus Intel's 12 MB does not appear to hurt it in these tests. Ultimately, the 8300GE wins on versatility, while the 14100T wins on specialized compute.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i3-14100T uses Raptor Lake-R architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE employs Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm node with a much smaller 137 mm² die. It packs 20,900 million transistors, compared to Intel's unspecified count, and offers 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs significantly. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing upgrade flexibility for existing platforms. AMD supports only DDR5, but with a stated memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, a feature valuable for workstation reliability. PCIe lanes also diverge: Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes—a generational advantage for Intel in storage or GPU bandwidth.

Integrated graphics set them apart. Intel ships UHD Graphics 730, while AMD includes Radeon 740M. The benchmark data does not include iGPU tests, but the Radeon 740M is generally expected to outperform Intel's UHD 730 based on architectural maturity. The AMD part also features a higher base clock (3.50 GHz vs 2.70 GHz) and boost clock (4.90 GHz vs 4.40 GHz), which likely contributes to its single-thread wins.

Socket compatibility is a major differentiator. Intel uses Socket 1700, while AMD uses AM5. Process nodes differ by a full generation, with AMD at 4 nm (TSMC) versus Intel at 10 nm. The AMD die is 26 mm² smaller, yet packs more transistors, reflecting the denser process. Both are locked (multiplier not unlocked) and target the 35W TDP class, though actual power behavior may vary.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T scores 17,648 on average, while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 17,614. The difference is 0.2%, with Intel holding a razor-thin margin.

Q: How do they compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE leads with 11,705 points versus Intel's 11,612, a 0.8% advantage. The same 0.8% delta appears in single-core, where AMD scores 1,652 to Intel's 1,639.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between them?

A: The biggest win for Intel is in PassMark physics, with a 29.7% lead (973 vs 750). The biggest win for AMD is in random string sorting, with a 13.5% lead (18,010 vs 15,579).

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-14100T and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE list ECC memory support as true, making both suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: Which chip has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE is built on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the Intel Core i3-14100T uses Intel's 10 nm process. AMD's die is also smaller at 137 mm² versus Intel's 163 mm².

Q: Are these CPUs unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Intel Core i3-14100T and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE have multiplierUnlocked set to false, meaning they are locked parts.

Where Each One Wins

For physics-based simulations and scientific computing, the Intel Core i3-14100T is the clear choice. Its 29.7% lead in PassMark physics and 27.1% advantage in floating-point math indicate superior handling of iterative calculations and vector operations. The 27.3% win in prime number finding further solidifies Intel's position for number-theoretic tasks. Integer math also edges to Intel, making it suitable for general arithmetic-heavy code.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE wins across rendering and productivity suites. It takes all Cinebench tests (R15, R20, R23) in both single and multi-core, suggesting better sustained performance in 3D rendering applications. Data encryption shows an 8.4% AMD advantage, critical for security software. Random string sorting, a proxy for database operations, favors AMD by 13.5%. Extended instructions, which include SSE/AVX workloads, show AMD ahead by 12.7%, indicating better optimization for modern compiled code.

For single-threaded responsiveness, AMD wins. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,644 beats Intel's 3,498 by 4%, and Cinebench single-core tests consistently favor AMD by 0.6-0.8%. This translates to faster application launches and snappier UI interactions. However, Intel's multithread PassMark win (13,662 vs 13,507, 1.1%) suggests better thread scheduling in certain parallel tasks.

Storage and connectivity favor Intel due to PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes, versus AMD's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. This matters for future-proofing NVMe drives or GPUs. Memory flexibility also belongs to Intel, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas AMD is DDR5-only. For legacy upgrades, Intel's Socket 1700 may offer cheaper motherboard options. For new builds, AMD's AM5 platform and Radeon 740M iGPU provide a more modern foundation, though the data does not quantify iGPU performance.