Intel Core i3-14100F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i3-14100F and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is decisively one-sided. Across all 17 recorded head-to-head tests, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus takes the win. The i3-14100F does not secure a single victory in any workload category.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 44,253 against the i3-14100F's 13,084, a delta of -70.4% for the smaller chip. The single-core R23 result narrows the gap considerably: 2,439 versus 1,847, a delta of -24.3%. This pattern repeats across the Cinebench suite. In R15 multi-core, the Ultra 7 scores 6,656 versus 1,318, a -80.2% delta. The R15 single-core test shows 354 versus 186, a -47.5% delta. R20 multi-core delivers 24,461 versus 5,495, a -77.5% delta, while R20 single-core lands at 3,453 versus 775, a -77.6% delta.

PassMark results follow the same trajectory, with the largest single delta appearing in the find prime numbers test. The Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 615, the i3-14100F scores 61, a -90.1% delta. Data encryption shows a -84.9% delta (59,097 versus 8,922), floating point math a -84.6% delta (229,491 versus 35,370), and random string sorting a -81.8% delta (96,945 versus 17,596). Extended instructions show an -81.1% delta (63,506 versus 11,984), while data compression shows -78.1% (804,322 versus 176,106).

The multi-threaded PassMark score gives the Ultra 7 a 68,574 result versus 15,420, a -77.5% delta. Integer math shows 175,986 versus 45,357, a -74.2% delta. Physics testing records 4,064 versus 1,077, a -73.5% delta. The single-thread PassMark result is the closest comparison on the board: 5,068 versus 3,778, a -25.5% delta.

The average benchmark score reflects the overall chasm. The i3-14100F averages 18,519 across all tests and sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus averages 93,785 and sits in the 96th percentile. The Ultra 7's nearest rivals in the database are server-class parts: the Intel Xeon 6520P at a 0% delta, the AMD EPYC 4564P at -1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F at -1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P at -2.1%. The i3-14100F's nearest rivals are far more modest: the Intel Core i5-13420H at 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE at 0.1%, the Intel Core i3-13100 at 0.8%, and the Intel Core 7 360 at 0.8%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different design lineages. The i3-14100F is a Raptor Lake Refresh part on a 10 nm process, built by Intel. It has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is an Arrow Lake Refresh part on a 3 nm process, fabricated by TSMC, with 24 cores and 24 threads. The transistor count tells part of the story: the Ultra 7 packs 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the i3-14100F uses a 163 mm² die with no transistor count listed in the database.

Cache allocations differ sharply. The i3-14100F has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 270K Plus has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. That larger L3 pool directly benefits multi-threaded applications that repeatedly access shared data.

Memory support also diverges. The i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 270K Plus supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Ultra 7's memory bandwidth is recorded at 115.2 GB/s, while the i3-14100F has no bandwidth figure listed. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The i3-14100F offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 270K Plus offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 also includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, while the i3-14100F has no integrated graphics at all.

Clock speeds favor the Ultra 7. The i3-14100F has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Ultra 7 270K Plus has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Power draw is substantially different as well: 58 W TDP for the i3-14100F versus 125 W TDP for the Ultra 7. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 for the i3-14100F, Intel Socket 1851 for the Ultra 7 270K Plus.

The multiplier is unlocked on the Ultra 7 270K Plus, allowing overclocking. The i3-14100F has a locked multiplier. The release dates are far apart: the i3-14100F launched in January 2024, while the Ultra 7 270K Plus launched in March 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The data records zero wins for the i3-14100F across all 17 head-to-head benchmarks. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus wins every category.

For the i3-14100F, the most favorable territory is single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread delta is -25.5%, and the Cinebench R23 single-core delta is -24.3%. These are the smallest gaps in the entire comparison, indicating that the i3-14100F's core efficiency at moderate clock speeds is respectable. In an application that relies heavily on a single thread and does not scale across many cores, the i3-14100F would still be clearly slower, but the difference would be less punishing than in multi-threaded workloads.

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus dominates every multi-threaded test by wide margins. The Cinebench R15 multi-core delta of -80.2%, R20 multi-core at -77.5%, and R23 multi-core at -70.4% all show that heavily threaded workloads are where the Ultra 7's 24 cores and 24 threads pull far ahead of the i3-14100F's 4 cores and 8 threads. The PassMark multithread test shows a -77.5% delta, confirming this pattern.

Specialized workloads amplify the Ultra 7's advantage. Prime number finding shows a -90.1% delta, the largest gap in the dataset. Floating point math shows -84.6%, encryption -84.9%, and random string sorting -81.8%. These results indicate the Ultra 7's architecture handles math-intensive and data-manipulation tasks with far greater throughput. The i3-14100F's 4 cores simply cannot match the parallel execution capacity of the larger chip.

The i3-14100F does have one practical advantage not reflected in benchmark scores: its 58 W TDP makes it suitable for systems with modest cooling and power delivery. The Ultra 7 270K Plus requires a 125 W TDP, which implies more substantial cooling and motherboard power circuitry. For a compact desktop build where power draw is a constraint, the i3-14100F is the only option that fits the profile, even though it loses every performance test.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforms the Intel Core i3-14100F in every single recorded test. The average benchmark score of 93,785 for the Ultra 7 versus 18,519 for the i3-14100F represents a fundamental performance class difference. The Ultra 7 sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the i3-14100F sits in the 72nd percentile.

Who should pick the i3-14100F? Anyone building a system where the 58 W TDP, the smaller 163 mm² die, or the older Intel Socket 1700 platform is a requirement. The i3-14100F supports DDR4 memory, which can reduce platform cost, and it has no integrated graphics, which matters only if a discrete GPU is already planned. Its 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for light desktop tasks, but the data shows it will trail the Ultra 7 by margins ranging from -24.3% to -90.1% depending on the workload.

Who should pick the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus? Anyone whose work or play benefits from the 24 cores, the 36 MB of L3 cache, the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, or the 5.50 GHz boost clock. The 17,800 million transistors and 3 nm TSMC process node indicate a far more advanced design. The Ultra 7's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and its integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, although the i3-14100F has no integrated graphics at all. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU give more headroom for high-bandwidth peripherals.

The closest comparison in the database for the i3-14100F is the Intel Core i5-13420H at a 0% delta, meaning those two chips perform at a nearly identical average level. The closest comparison for the Ultra 7 270K Plus is the Intel Xeon 6520P at a 0% delta, a server processor. That contrast summarizes the gap: the i3-14100F competes with mobile and lower-end desktop parts, while the Ultra 7 270K Plus competes with server-class silicon.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 44,253 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 13,084, a delta of -70.4% for the i3.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two?

A: The smallest recorded gap is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 2,439 and the i3-14100F scores 1,847, a -24.3% delta. PassMark single-thread shows the same -25.5% delta.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i3-14100F and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus support ECC memory. Both also use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has integrated graphics, using Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The i3-14100F has no integrated graphics.

Q: Are the two processors compatible with the same motherboard socket?

A: No. The i3-14100F uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18,519 across all tests. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93,785.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-14100F | Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 24 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 58 W | 125 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake Refresh |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 163 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | $109 | $299 |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2026-03-10 |

| Part Number | SRMX2 | SA4V6 |