Intel Core i3-14100F vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

The Intel Core i3-14100F and the Intel Core i5-14501TE both belong to Intel’s Core 14th Gen family, sharing the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename. They use the same Intel Socket 1700, are built on the same 10 nm process node, and are produced by Intel. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, both support ECC memory, and both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The i3-14100F is a desktop processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, a base clock of 3.50 GHz, a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and a TDP of 58. The i5-14501TE is also a desktop part, but with 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 2.20 GHz, a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and a TDP of 45. The i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, while the i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The i3-14100F was released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $109. The i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30 with no recorded launch MSRP. The i3-14100F has a part number of SRMX2, and the i5-14501TE has a part number of Q49KSRNJN. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core i3-14100F, but no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the i3-14100F’s measured performance, interpreted against the i5-14501TE’s specifications and its percentile placement. The i3-14100F achieves an average benchmark score of 18519 across all recorded tests, which places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The i5-14501TE, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 because no tests have been recorded for it. This percentile gap indicates that the i3-14100F sits well above the median processor, while the i5-14501TE sits exactly at the median, implying that the i3-14100F has a substantial performance advantage in the tests that have been measured.

Looking at specific Cinebench results, the i3-14100F scores 1318 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 186 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5495 multi-core and 775 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 13084 and the single-core score is 1847. These numbers show a consistent pattern: the i3-14100F delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for a 4-core, 8-thread processor, and its single-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1847. Since the i5-14501TE has no recorded Cinebench scores, no direct numerical comparison can be made, but the i5-14501TE’s lower base clock of 2.20 GHz compared to the i3-14100F’s 3.50 GHz suggests that in single-threaded workloads, the i3-14100F likely holds an advantage, despite the i5-14501TE’s higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz over the i3-14100F’s 4.70 GHz.

In Geekbench, the i3-14100F records a multi-core score of 7598 and a single-core score of 2105. These scores reinforce the i3-14100F’s position as a capable performer. The multi-core score of 7598 is particularly notable given the processor’s 4-core configuration, and it aligns with the processor’s 72nd percentile ranking. The i5-14501TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, would theoretically have more parallel processing capacity, but without recorded Geekbench data, the actual outcome remains unmeasured. The i5-14501TE’s TDP of 45 is lower than the i3-14100F’s 58, which may indicate that the i5-14501TE is designed for power-constrained environments, potentially limiting sustained multi-core performance despite having more cores.

PassMark tests provide a broader view of the i3-14100F’s capabilities. In PassMark multi-thread, the i3-14100F scores 15420, and in PassMark single-thread it scores 3778 (also recorded as passmark_singlethread with the same score). The i3-14100F also achieves 45357 in integer math, 35370 in floating point math, 11984 in extended instructions, 8922 in data encryption, 176106 in data compression, 17596 in random string sorting, 61 in find prime numbers, and 1077 in physics. These results indicate balanced performance across a variety of computational tasks. The data compression score of 176106 is particularly high, suggesting the i3-14100F handles compression workloads effectively. The find prime numbers score of 61 is low, which is typical for this specific test that measures a particular type of integer operation. The i5-14501TE has no PassMark scores, so the comparison cannot extend to these metrics.

The nearest rivals for the i3-14100F in the database provide context for its performance. The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average score of 18511, which is essentially identical to the i3-14100F’s 18519, showing a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18505, also a 0.1 percent difference from the i3-14100F. The Intel Core i3-13100 scores 18380, which is 0.8 percent lower, and the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374, also 0.8 percent lower. These rivals confirm that the i3-14100F performs at a level comparable to processors with more cores, such as the i5-13420H, which typically has 8 cores, and the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE. The i5-14501TE, with no recorded average score, cannot be placed in this ranking, but its 50th percentile suggests it would sit far below these rivals.

Where Each One Wins

The i3-14100F wins in every scenario where recorded data exists, simply because it is the only one of the two with benchmark measurements. Its 4 cores and 8 threads, combined with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13084 and a single-core score of 1847. This makes the i3-14100F well suited for tasks that depend on single-threaded performance, such as many older games or lightly threaded applications, where the higher base clock provides a consistent advantage. The PassMark single-thread score of 3778 reinforces this strength. The i3-14100F also handles multi-threaded workloads reasonably well, as shown by its PassMark multi-thread score of 15420 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7598, so it can manage tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, though not at the level of higher-core-count processors.

The i5-14501TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, has a structural advantage in raw thread count. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is higher than the i3-14100F’s 4.70 GHz, which could give it an edge in lightly threaded workloads when boosting is sustained. However, its base clock of 2.20 GHz is significantly lower, meaning that under sustained loads that do not reach boost frequencies, the i5-14501TE may operate at a slower pace. The i5-14501TE also includes UHD Graphics 770, whereas the i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, so the i5-14501TE wins in scenarios where a discrete GPU is not available or where quick sync video encoding is needed. The i5-14501TE’s lower TDP of 45 compared to 58 suggests it is intended for systems with tighter thermal or power budgets, such as small form factor desktops or always-on machines.

In terms of memory, both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory, so neither wins on memory flexibility. Both use the same PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so expansion capabilities are identical. The i3-14100F has a smaller die size of 163 mm², while the i5-14501TE has a larger die size of 215 mm², which is consistent with the i5-14501TE having more cores and a larger L3 cache. The i3-14100F has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, doubling the last-level cache, which can benefit workloads that reuse data sets. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, so per-core cache behavior is identical.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same fundamental architecture: Raptor Lake, with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. Both are part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The key architectural differences lie in the core configuration and cache hierarchy. The i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, meaning it uses hyper-threading to double the thread count. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, also using hyper-threading. This gives the i5-14501TE 50% more cores and 50% more threads than the i3-14100F. The L3 cache scales accordingly: the i3-14100F has 12 MB shared, while the i5-14501TE has 24 MB shared, exactly double. The L1 and L2 caches are identical on a per-core basis: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The die size differs, with the i3-14100F at 163 mm² and the i5-14501TE at 215 mm², reflecting the additional cores and cache.

Clock speeds differ markedly. The i3-14100F has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The i5-14501TE has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The i3-14100F’s base clock is 1.30 GHz higher, which means at idle or low load, the i3-14100F runs faster. The i5-14501TE’s boost clock is 0.40 GHz higher, giving it a potential advantage in short bursts of single-threaded work. The TDP reflects the intended power envelope: 58 for the i3-14100F and 45 for the i5-14501TE. The lower TDP of the i5-14501TE, despite having more cores, indicates that it is designed to operate within a stricter power limit, which may cap its sustained performance.

The integrated graphics differ. The i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output. The i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display capabilities and hardware acceleration for video encoding and decoding. This is a significant feature difference for systems that do not use a discrete GPU. Both processors support ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer parts and beneficial for certain workstation or server workloads. Both use the same socket, Intel Socket 1700, and both have an unlocked multiplier set to false, so overclocking is not supported through multiplier adjustment.

The release dates differ. The i3-14100F was released on 2024-01-07, while the i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30, nearly six months later. The i3-14100F has a recorded launch MSRP of $109, while the i5-14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP. The production status for both is Active. The part numbers are SRMX2 for the i3-14100F and Q49KSRNJN for the i5-14501TE. Memory support is identical: DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with no recorded memory bandwidth figure for either. The PCIe configuration is also identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core i3-14100F is the only processor of the two with measured performance, and those measurements place it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18519. The Intel Core i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded average score, which means its performance is unverified in the database. For any workload where benchmark results matter, the i3-14100F is the safer choice because its performance is documented and strong. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13084 and single-core score of 1847, along with a Geekbench multi-core score of 7598, demonstrate that it can handle both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks competently.

The i5-14501TE offers more cores and threads, 6 and 12 respectively, compared to the i3-14100F’s 4 and 8, and it has double the L3 cache at 24 MB versus 12 MB. It also has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz and includes integrated graphics, which the i3-14100F lacks. The i5-14501TE’s lower TDP of 45 makes it more power-efficient on paper. However, without any benchmark scores, the practical impact of these specifications cannot be quantified. The i5-14501TE’s lower base clock of 2.20 GHz may undermine its multi-threaded performance in sustained workloads, and its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not expected to outperform the i3-14100F, which ranks in the 72nd percentile.

For users who rely on measured performance data, the i3-14100F is the clear choice. For users who need integrated graphics or require a lower TDP for a compact or power-sensitive system, the i5-14501TE has a specification advantage, but its actual performance remains unknown. The i3-14100F also has a launch MSRP of $109, which provides a reference point for its market position, while the i5-14501TE has no such reference. Given the data, the i3-14100F delivers verified performance across a range of benchmarks, and the i5-14501TE offers a higher core count and integrated graphics but no measured results to confirm its capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the Intel Core i3-14100F and the Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i3-14100F’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F is in the 72nd percentile, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE is in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has a TDP of 58, and the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the Intel Core i3-14100F and the Intel Core i5-14501TE:

• Cores: 4 vs 6
• Threads: 8 vs 12
• Base clock: 3.50 GHz vs 2.20 GHz
• Boost clock: 4.70 GHz vs 5.10 GHz
• TDP: 58 vs 45
• Die size: 163 mm² vs 215 mm²
• L3 cache: 12 MB (shared) vs 24 MB (shared)
• Integrated graphics: N/A vs UHD Graphics 770
• Release date: 2024-01-07 vs 2024-06-30
• Launch MSRP: $109 vs null (no recorded value)
• Part number: SRMX2 vs Q49KSRNJN
• Average benchmark score: 18519 vs 0
• Percentile vs all CPUs: 72 vs 50

All other recorded specifications are identical: Intel Socket 1700, Raptor Lake architecture, Raptor Lake-R codename, 10 nm process node, Intel foundry, 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, Desktop market segment, Active production status, and multiplier locked.