Intel Core i3-1315UE vs Intel Core i7-4910MQ Comparison

The Intel Core i7-4910MQ and Intel Core i3-1315UE represent two very different eras of mobile computing, separated by nearly a decade of architectural evolution. The data shows a consistent outcome: the newer Core i3-1315UE wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, despite its lower tier and lower power envelope. Across six Cinebench tests, the i3-1315UE holds a decisive advantage, with deltas ranging from -11.4% to -11.8% relative to the i7-4910MQ. The older Haswell chip, while a former flagship, cannot keep pace with the efficiency and IPC gains of Raptor Lake.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i3-1315UE scores 606 against the i7-4910MQ’s 536, a difference of -11.6% for the older chip. The single-core R15 test tells a similar story: 85 for the i3-1315UE versus 75 for the i7-4910MQ, a -11.8% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i3-1315UE again leads in multicore with 2525 points versus 2236, a -11.4% delta, and in single-core with 356 versus 315, a -11.5% delta. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, the most demanding test in the set: the i3-1315UE scores 6013 multicore and 849 single-core, while the i7-4910MQ manages 5326 and 752 respectively, both showing a -11.4% delta.

What is notable is the consistency of the margins. Every test shows roughly an 11.4% to 11.8% advantage for the i3-1315UE, regardless of whether the workload is single-threaded or multi-threaded. This uniformity suggests a fundamental per-clock efficiency advantage rather than a scalar or core-count effect. The i7-4910MQ’s best result is its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 75, but even that trails the i3-1315UE’s 85. The data indicates the i3-1315UE is faster across the board, with no workload category where the older i7 pulls ahead. In the head-to-head tally, the i3-1315UE wins 6 out of 6 benchmarks; the i7-4910MQ wins none.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the i3-1315UE wins in every measured workload. The six Cinebench tests cover both single-core and multi-core rendering scenarios, and the i3-1315UE leads in all of them. This means for CPU-bound tasks such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or general productivity, the i3-1315UE is the superior performer. Its single-core advantage of roughly 11.5-11.8% also indicates better responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, or legacy software that relies on one or two threads.

The i7-4910MQ, by contrast, has no benchmark wins to point to. Its average benchmark score is 1716, placing it in the 41st percentile of all CPUs, while the i3-1315UE averages 1739, also in the 41st percentile. The i7-4910MQ’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (avg score 1715, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-990X (avg score 1713, 0.2% delta), showing it sits in a performance tier comparable to those older parts. The i3-1315UE’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-10100 (avg score 1742, -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 3 4300U (avg score 1742, -0.2% delta), indicating it competes with desktop-class i3 parts from a few generations back. In short, the i3-1315UE is the clear winner in every scenario the benchmark data covers, and the i7-4910MQ offers no countervailing advantage in any measured metric.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is vast. The i7-4910MQ uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process node, with a die size of 177 mm² and 1,400 million transistors. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. Its cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support is limited to DDR3 in dual-channel mode, yielding a memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. The integrated graphics are Intel HD 4600. It uses the Intel Socket G3 and supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The i3-1315UE, by contrast, is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node. It has 6 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 1200.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache layout is different: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 10 MB shared L3. Memory support expands to both DDR4 and DDR5, still in dual-channel mode, though no memory bandwidth figure is provided in the data. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 64EU. It uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

The process node shrink from 22 nm to 10 nm is the foundational difference. This allows the i3-1315UE to pack 6 cores into a 15 W TDP, whereas the i7-4910MQ has a 47 W TDP for only 4 cores. The i3-1315UE’s boost clock of 4.50 GHz is substantially higher than the i7-4910MQ’s 3.90 GHz, and its L3 cache is 10 MB versus 8 MB. The i3-1315UE also has a more modern memory controller, supporting DDR5, while the i7-4910MQ is limited to DDR3. The production statuses differ too: the i7-4910MQ is end-of-life, released in January 2014, while the i3-1315UE is active, released in January 2023. The i7-4910MQ’s launch MSRP was $570, but no launch MSRP is listed for the i3-1315UE.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the Intel Core i3-1315UE is the superior processor in every benchmark category measured. It wins all six Cinebench tests, with margins of roughly 11.4% to 11.8% over the i7-4910MQ. This is particularly striking given that the i3-1315UE is a lower-tier chip with a 15 W TDP, while the i7-4910MQ is a 47 W part. The architectural improvements from Haswell to Raptor Lake, the process node shrink from 22 nm to 10 nm, and the higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus 3.90 GHz all contribute to the newer chip’s dominance.

For anyone choosing between these two, the i3-1315UE is the clear pick on performance. It also offers modern features like DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4, though with fewer CPU lanes (8 versus 16). The i7-4910MQ, being end-of-life, offers no current advantages in the benchmark data. Its only potential edge is the larger PCIe lane count, but that is not reflected in any CPU benchmark score. The i3-1315UE’s average benchmark score of 1739 is higher than the i7-4910MQ’s 1716, and both sit in the 41st percentile of all CPUs, but the head-to-head results are what matter most. The verdict is unambiguous: choose the i3-1315UE for better performance in all tested workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE scores 849 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Intel Core i7-4910MQ scores 752, giving the i3-1315UE an -11.4% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-core Cinebench R20 performance?

A: The i3-1315UE scores 2525 in Cinebench R20 multicore, versus 2236 for the i7-4910MQ, a delta of -11.4% in favor of the i3-1315UE.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The i7-4910MQ has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the i3-1315UE has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i3-1315UE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the i7-4910MQ has a boost clock of 3.90 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP for each chip?

A: The i7-4910MQ has a TDP of 47 W, and the i3-1315UE has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, both the i7-4910MQ and the i3-1315UE have ECC memory support set to false.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-4910MQ | Intel Core i3-1315UE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 1200.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.90 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 47 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket G3 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 10 nm |

| Transistors | 1,400 million | null |

| Die Size | 177 mm² | null |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2014-01-19 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $570 | null |

| Part Number | SR1PT | null |