Intel Core i3-1315UE vs Intel Core i7-4860HQ Comparison

The Intel Core i3-1315UE and Intel Core i7-4860HQ are both mobile processors, but the data places them in entirely different eras. The i3-1315UE wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the Cinebench suite, taking all six contests with a minimum advantage of 13.3%. The i7-4860HQ, a 2014 Haswell part, retains parity in overall percentile ranking — both sit at the 41st percentile — but that is where the similarity ends. The newer Raptor Lake chip is not just faster; it is decisively faster across single-core and multi-core workloads, making the comparison less about raw capability and more about efficiency and platform relevance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-1315UE wins everywhere that Cinebench measures. In multi-core tests, the advantage is consistent: a 13.7% lead in Cinebench R15 multicore (606 vs 533), a 13.5% lead in R20 multicore (2525 vs 2224), and a 13.5% lead in R23 multicore (6013 vs 5297). Single-core results are even more lopsided in percentage terms, with the i3-1315UE ahead by 13.3% in R15 (85 vs 75), 13.7% in R20 (356 vs 313), and 13.7% in R23 (849 vs 747). There is no workload category in the provided benchmarks where the i7-4860HQ posts a winning score.

The i7-4860HQ does have one area of distinction, but it is not a performance win. It offers a wider PCIe configuration: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the i3-1315UE. That is a connectivity advantage for older peripherals, but it does not translate into any benchmark victory. The i7-4860HQ also has a higher base clock (2.40 GHz vs 1.20 GHz) and a higher TDP (47 W vs 15 W), but the i3-1315UE compensates with a much higher boost clock (4.50 GHz vs 3.60 GHz) and a newer architecture. The verdict is simple: the i3-1315UE wins all compute tests; the i7-4860HQ wins nothing in the benchmark suite.

The Verdict

Pick the Intel Core i3-1315UE if you prioritize any form of Cinebench performance. The data shows a clean sweep: six wins out of six head-to-head tests, with deltas ranging from 13.3% to 13.7%. The i3-1315UE also does this while consuming a fraction of the power — 15 W TDP versus 47 W for the i7-4860HQ — making it the obvious choice for sustained mobile workloads where thermals and battery life matter. The newer chip uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, while the i7-4860HQ uses Haswell on 22 nm, and that generational gap shows in every score.

The Intel Core i7-4860HQ is not without a case, but it is a narrow one. It supports up to 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, double the lane count of the i3-1315UE’s 8 Gen 4 lanes. If you need legacy PCIe device connectivity or are tied to a BGA 1364 platform, the i7-4860HQ is the only option. It also has a higher base clock at 2.40 GHz, which can help in lightly threaded tasks that do not trigger boost behavior, but that advantage evaporates in any measured benchmark. For any user focused on compute performance, the i3-1315UE is the superior part. For users with a specific need for 16 PCIe lanes on an older socket, the i7-4860HQ remains functional but obsolete.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the Intel Core i3-1315UE comes in Cinebench R15 multicore, where it scores 606 against the i7-4860HQ’s 533, a 13.7% margin. The same percentage appears in R20 single-core (356 vs 313) and R23 single-core (849 vs 747), showing that the i3-1315UE’s advantage is consistent regardless of workload intensity. The smallest margin is in R15 single-core, where the i3-1315UE leads by 13.3% (85 vs 75), but that is still a substantial gap for a single-threaded test.

Multi-core results tell a similar story. In Cinebench R20 multicore, the i3-1315UE scores 2525 versus 2224, a 13.5% lead. In R23 multicore, the scores are 6013 and 5297, again a 13.5% gap. The i7-4860HQ’s best relative performance is in R15 multicore, where it loses by 13.7%, and its worst is in R15 single-core, where it loses by 13.3%. There is no test where the i7-4860HQ comes within double digits of the i3-1315UE. The data also shows the i7-4860HQ has Geekbench scores (3527 multicore, 1045 single-core) that are not present for the i3-1315UE, but those are not head-to-head comparisons and cannot be used to infer a relative standing.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE scores 849, which is 13.7% higher than the Intel Core i7-4860HQ’s 747.

Q: How large is the multi-core advantage in Cinebench R20?

A: The i3-1315UE scores 2525 versus 2224 for the i7-4860HQ, a 13.5% lead.

Q: Does the i7-4860HQ win any benchmark in the head-to-head data?

A: No. The i3-1315UE wins all six Cinebench tests, with winsA equal to 6 and winsB equal to 0.

Q: What is the difference in process node between the two chips?

A: The i3-1315UE uses a 10 nm process, while the i7-4860HQ uses a 22 nm process.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i3-1315UE has an average benchmark score of 1739, and the i7-4860HQ has an average score of 1720. Both are at the 41st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which chip has a higher TDP?

A: The i7-4860HQ has a TDP of 47 W, while the i3-1315UE has a TDP of 15 W.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i3-1315UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It has 6 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 64EU, and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, and the socket is Intel BGA 1744.

The Intel Core i7-4860HQ is a Haswell part, codenamed Crystalwell, on a 22 nm process. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. It uses Intel HD 5200 integrated graphics, supports only DDR3 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, and offers PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The socket is Intel BGA 1364. The i7-4860HQ has a transistor count of 1,400 million and a die size of 264 mm², whereas the i3-1315UE does not list those figures.

The i3-1315UE is listed as Active in production, while the i7-4860HQ is End-of-life. The release dates are also far apart: the i3-1315UE launched in January 2023, and the i7-4860HQ launched in January 2014. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and both are mobile segments. The i3-1315UE has a part number of SR1BP, while the i7-4860HQ does not list one in the data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The i3-1315UE has 6 cores and 8 threads, while the i7-4860HQ has 4 cores and 8 threads. The base clock is 1.20 GHz on the i3-1315UE versus 2.40 GHz on the i7-4860HQ, but the boost clock favors the i3-1315UE at 4.50 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. TDP is a major split: 15 W for the i3-1315UE versus 47 W for the i7-4860HQ.

The cache differs as well. L1 cache is 80 KB per core on the i3-1315UE versus 64 KB per core on the i7-4860HQ. L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the i3-1315UE versus 256 KB per core on the i7-4860HQ. L3 cache is 10 MB shared on the i3-1315UE versus 6 MB shared on the i7-4860HQ. The i3-1315UE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the i7-4860HQ supports DDR3 only. Memory bandwidth is listed only for the i7-4860HQ at 25.6 GB/s; the i3-1315UE does not provide a figure.

PCIe connectivity also differs: the i3-1315UE offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the i7-4860HQ offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 64EU on the i3-1315UE versus Intel HD 5200 on the i7-4860HQ. Sockets are different: Intel BGA 1744 for the i3-1315UE and Intel BGA 1364 for the i7-4860HQ. Production status is Active for the i3-1315UE and End-of-life for the i7-4860HQ. The process node is 10 nm for the i3-1315UE and 22 nm for the i7-4860HQ. The i7-4860HQ lists a transistor count of 1,400 million and a die size of 264 mm², while the i3-1315UE does not. Neither chip supports ECC memory.