Intel Core i3-12300 vs Intel Core i9-10885H Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i3-12300

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 60W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE —
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-10885H

CORE STATE Comet Lake-H
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,230
1,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
173
172
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,128
5,082
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
724
717
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,211
12,102
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,724
1,708
geekbench_multicore
N/A
6,764
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
1,447

Analysis: Intel Core i3-12300 vs Intel Core i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H and Intel Core i3-12300 come from different generations and market segments, yet the recorded head-to-head data delivers a clear outcome. Across all six Cinebench tests, the Intel Core i3-12300 posts higher scores than the Intel Core i9-10885H, despite having half the cores and threads. The margins are narrow but consistent, and the architecture differences help explain why the newer, smaller processor wins every shared benchmark.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six Cinebench comparisons between these two processors. The Intel Core i3-12300 wins all six. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i3-12300 scores 1230 against the i9-10885H's 1219, a 0.9% lead. In R15 single-core, the i3-12300 scores 173 versus 172, a 0.6% margin. Moving to R20, the i3-12300 scores 5128 against 5082 in multi-core, again 0.9% ahead, and 724 versus 717 in single-core, a 1% lead. In R23, the i3-12300 scores 12211 against 12102 in multi-core (0.9% ahead) and 1724 versus 1708 in single-core (0.9% ahead). The margins are tight, but they are uniform across every test.

The i9-10885H has a higher boost clock at 5.30 GHz compared to the i3-12300's 4.40 GHz, and it has 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads. Yet the i3-12300 still edges ahead. The i3-12300's base clock is higher at 3.50 GHz versus 2.40 GHz, which likely contributes to its single-core advantage. The newer Alder Lake architecture appears to offset the core count deficit. The i9-10885H also has a larger L3 cache at 16 MB shared, while the i3-12300 has 12 MB shared, but that does not translate into a win.

Both processors sit at the 55th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The i9-10885H has an average benchmark score of 3651, while the i3-12300 has an average of 3532. However, these averages are not directly comparable because they are based on different sets of recorded tests. The head-to-head results are the only direct comparison, and they favor the i3-12300 in every instance.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded head-to-head data, the Intel Core i3-12300 wins every benchmark it shares with the i9-10885H. There are no tests where the i9-10885H comes out ahead. The i9-10885H does have Geekbench scores in the database: 6764 multi-core and 1447 single-core. However, the i3-12300 has no Geekbench scores recorded, so no direct comparison is possible. In the six Cinebench tests, the i3-12300 is the clear winner.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded performance, the i3-12300's victory is notable because the i9-10885H has double the cores and threads. The i3-12300's higher base clock and newer process node (10 nm versus 14 nm) likely explain the result. For single-threaded tasks, the i3-12300 also leads, though by a smaller margin. The i9-10885H's boost clock advantage does not translate into a win. The i3-12300's wins are consistent across all three Cinebench versions, suggesting a stable performance edge rather than a test-specific anomaly.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every architectural aspect. The i9-10885H uses the Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm process, while the i3-12300 uses Alder Lake on a 10 nm process. The i9-10885H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i3-12300 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The i9-10885H has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz; the i3-12300 has a base of 3.50 GHz and a boost of 4.40 GHz. The i9-10885H has a TDP of 45 W, the i3-12300 has a TDP of 60 W.

Cache configurations differ as well. The i9-10885H has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The i3-12300 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The i9-10885H supports DDR4 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. The i3-12300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded.

The i9-10885H uses Intel BGA 1440 socket, while the i3-12300 uses Intel Socket 1700. The i9-10885H has PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i3-12300 has PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the i9-10885H has UHD Graphics 630, the i3-12300 has UHD Graphics 730. The i9-10885H is a mobile processor, while the i3-12300 is a desktop processor. The i9-10885H is end-of-life, while the i3-12300 is active. The i9-10885H has a release date of 2020-04-01, while the i3-12300 has no recorded release date. The die size is 206 mm² for the i9-10885H and 163 mm² for the i3-12300.

The Verdict

The recorded data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-12300 outperforms the Intel Core i9-10885H in every head-to-head benchmark. The i3-12300 wins all six Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 0.6% to 1%. This is despite the i9-10885H having twice the cores and threads and a higher boost clock. The i3-12300's newer architecture, higher base clock, and smaller process node appear to be decisive.

For users choosing between these two processors based on the available benchmark data, the i3-12300 is the better performer. The i9-10885H does have Geekbench scores, but without a corresponding i3-12300 score, they cannot be compared. The i9-10885H also has a higher launch MSRP of $556, while the i3-12300 has a launch MSRP of $143. However, price is not a factor in performance analysis. The i3-12300 is the clear winner in the recorded tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-12300 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i9-10885H has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, while the i3-12300 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The i3-12300 scores 12211, while the i9-10885H scores 12102, so the i3-12300 wins by 0.9%.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The i9-10885H supports DDR4 only. The i3-12300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i9-10885H has 16 MB of shared L3, while the i3-12300 has 12 MB of shared L3.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The i9-10885H has a TDP of 45 W, and the i3-12300 has a TDP of 60 W.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i9-10885H | Intel Core i3-12300 |

|-------|----------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 60 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Alder Lake |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 206 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2020-04-01 | Not recorded |

| Launch MSRP | $556 | $143 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i3-12300
i9-10885H
Core Specs
Cores
4
8 +100.0%
Threads
8
16 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.5
2.4 -31.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.4
5.3 +20.5%
Frequency (GHz)
3.5
2.4 -31.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.4
5.3 +20.5%
Multiplier
35
24 -31.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
12 MB (shared)
16 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
60
45 -25.0%
PL1
60W
—
PL2
89W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Alder Lake
Comet Lake
Codename
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Generation
Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
Core i9 (Comet Lake-H)
Process Size
10 nm
14 nm
Die Size
163 mm²
206 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
—
46.9 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel BGA 1440
Chipsets
Z690, H670, B660, H610
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 630
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$143
$556
Part Number
SRL61
SRJ8J
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA14F
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i3-12300 Details View Core i9-10885H Details