Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs Intel Core i7-10610U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data tells a consistent story: the Intel Core i7-10610U wins every single recorded comparison, across all six Cinebench tests. The margins are remarkably uniform, hovering around 19 to 20 percent in favor of the i7. There is no test in the database where the Core i3-1115G4E manages to close the gap or take a win.

Starting with multi-core workloads, the i7-10610U posts a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 561 against the i3-1115G4E's 452, a 19.4 percent advantage. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core: 2338 versus 1887, again a 19.3 percent gap. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7 scores 5569 while the i3 scores 4493, once more a 19.3 percent difference. These are not isolated results; the consistency across all three Cinebench versions indicates a structural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

Single-core results follow the same trajectory. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the i7-10610U scores 79 versus the i3's 63, a 20.3 percent lead. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 330 against 266, a 19.4 percent edge. Cinebench R23 single-core rounds out the set with 786 versus 634, a 19.3 percent difference. The single-core margins are nearly identical to the multi-core margins, which suggests the i7's advantage comes from higher clock potential rather than just having more physical cores.

The i7-10610U also carries a higher average benchmark score in the database: 1611 across all recorded tests, compared to 1559 for the i3-1115G4E. Both processors sit at the 39th percentile among all CPUs tracked, so in the broader landscape they occupy similar tiers. The i7's nearest rivals by average score include the Intel Core i7-970 at 1613 (just 0.1 percent higher) and the Intel Core i3-9100T at 1620 (0.6 percent higher). The i3-1115G4E's nearest rivals include the AMD Opteron 6276 at 1560 and the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X at 1562, with deltas of only 0.1 to 0.2 percent. In other words, the i3 is tightly grouped with older desktop parts, while the i7 sits among higher-performing mobile and desktop chips.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design generations and manufacturing processes. The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically the Tiger Lake-U codename, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Core i7-10610U belongs to the Comet Lake family, codename Comet Lake-U, fabricated on a 14 nm process. This process gap is significant: the i3 benefits from a newer, denser manufacturing node, while the i7 relies on a more mature but physically larger process.

Core counts differ substantially. The i3-1115G4E has 2 cores and 4 threads, making it a dual-core part with Hyper-Threading. The i7-10610U has 4 cores and 8 threads, a true quad-core design with Hyper-Threading. That doubling of physical cores explains a large portion of the multi-core benchmark gap, though the single-core gap shows that clock speed also plays a role.

Clock speeds are where the i7 pulls ahead. The i3-1115G4E has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The i7-10610U lists a base clock of 1800.00 MHz, which converts to 1.80 GHz, but a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The i7's boost ceiling is a full 1.0 GHz higher than the i3's, and that higher boost clock directly explains the single-core benchmark superiority. The i7's lower base clock is less relevant in short burst workloads, where boost behavior dominates.

Cache layouts are also different. The i3-1115G4E offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-10610U has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7's larger total L3 (8 MB versus 6 MB) provides more shared cache for its four cores, while the i3's larger per-core L2 (1.25 MB versus 256 KB) reflects its newer architecture's design priorities.

Memory support differs as well. The i3-1115G4E supports DDR4 and LPDDR4X, while the i7-10610U supports DDR3 and DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The i3's LPDDR4X support makes it more suitable for low-power, compact designs. PCIe connectivity also diverges: the i3 offers Gen 4 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the i7 uses Gen 3. The i3's PCIe Gen 4 support is a clear generational upgrade, though the limited lane count (4 lanes) constrains its practical bandwidth.

Integrated graphics differ in naming and capability. The i3-1115G4E ships with UHD Graphics G4 with 48 execution units. The i7-10610U ships with simply "UHD Graphics," which in the Comet Lake lineup is a lower-tier implementation with fewer execution units. The i3's 48 EU configuration outclasses the i7's integrated GPU in terms of raw execution resources, which matters for systems without a discrete graphics card.

Thermal design power also differs. The i3-1115G4E is rated at 15 W TDP, while the i7-10610U is rated at 25 W. Despite the i7's higher TDP, both are mobile-class parts intended for laptops and compact systems. The i3's lower TDP makes it easier to cool in thinner chassis.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner: the Intel Core i7-10610U dominates the Intel Core i3-1115G4E in every recorded benchmark. Across all six Cinebench tests, the i7 leads by roughly 19 to 20 percent. The i7 also has a higher average benchmark score (1611 versus 1559), though both sit at the 39th percentile overall.

The i3-1115G4E is not without merits. Its 10 nm Tiger Lake architecture gives it a newer process node, PCIe Gen 4 support, LPDDR4X memory compatibility, and a more capable integrated GPU with 48 execution units. Its 15 W TDP makes it more power-efficient on paper. But in raw compute performance, the i7's 4 cores, 8 threads, and 4.90 GHz boost clock simply outclass the i3's 2 cores, 4 threads, and 3.90 GHz boost clock.

Who should pick the i7-10610U: anyone running multi-threaded workloads, content creation tasks, or CPU-heavy applications where the 19 to 20 percent advantage across Cinebench tests translates directly to faster render times. The i7's 8 threads give it meaningful headroom for parallel workloads that the i3 cannot match.

Who should pick the i3-1115G4E: systems where power draw is the primary constraint, or where the integrated GPU matters more than CPU throughput. The i3's 15 W TDP and 48 EU integrated graphics make it a reasonable choice for basic productivity and media playback in a low-power chassis. Its PCIe Gen 4 support also provides modern connectivity options.

The i7-10610U is listed as end-of-life production status, while the i3-1115G4E remains active. The i3 also has a launch MSRP of $285; no launch MSRP is recorded for the i7. For pure performance, the i7 wins. For longevity and modern features, the i3 has the edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-10610U wins in all three multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 561 in R15, 2338 in R20, and 5569 in R23, versus the i3-1115G4E's 452, 1887, and 4493 respectively. The margin is consistently about 19.3 to 19.4 percent.

Q: Is the Core i3-1115G4E faster in single-core tests?

A: No. The i7-10610U also wins every single-core test, with scores of 79 in R15, 330 in R20, and 786 in R23, compared to the i3's 63, 266, and 634. The i7's lead ranges from 19.3 to 20.3 percent.

Q: What explains the i7's performance advantage?

A: The i7-10610U has 4 cores and 8 threads versus the i3's 2 cores and 4 threads. It also boosts to 4.90 GHz compared to the i3's 3.90 GHz, which explains the single-core wins.

Q: Does the i3 have any architectural advantages?

A: Yes. The i3-1115G4E uses the newer Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, supports PCIe Gen 4, and includes UHD Graphics G4 with 48 execution units. The i7 uses the older Comet Lake architecture on 14 nm with PCIe Gen 3.

Q: Which processor has better integrated graphics?

A: The i3-1115G4E, which features UHD Graphics G4 with 48 execution units. The i7-10610U only lists "UHD Graphics without a specific EU count, which in the Comet Lake lineup is a lower-tier implementation.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The i3-1115G4E is rated at 15 W, while the i7-10610U is rated at 25 W- a 10 W difference that makes the i3 easier to cool in thin laptops.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-10610U wins all six head-to-head benchmark categories, so the database records show no test where the i3 takes a win. That makes the use-case split straightforward: the i7 is the choice for performance-first systems. Its 4 cores and 8 threads, combined with a 4.90 GHz boost clock, deliver 19.3 to 20.3 percent higher scores across every Cinebench test. Any workload that scales with thread count, from video rendering to software compilation, benefits from the i7's doubling of physical cores.

The i3-1115G4E wins in areas that are not captured by the Cinebench suite. Its 15 W TDP makes it the more power-conscious option for compact laptops and fanless designs. Its UHD Graphics G4 with 48 execution units provides a stronger integrated GPU option for casual gaming and hardware-accelerated video playback. PCIe Gen 4 support, while limited to 4 lanes, offers modern connectivity that the i7's Gen 3 lacks. The i3's 10 nm Tiger Lake process also brings newer Intel architecture features and LPDDR4X memory support, which suits thin-and-light designs where power efficiency matters more than raw CPU throughput.

For a database perspective: the i7's average benchmark score of 1611 places it within 0.1 percent of the Core i7-970 and 0.4 percent behind the Core i3-9100E, meaning it performs like those desktop-class parts. The i3's average score of 1559 puts it within 0.1 percent of the AMD Opteron 6276 and 0.2 percent of the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X. The i7 sits in faster company, while the i3 is grouped with older or lower-tier hardware. Users who need maximum compute should pick the i7. Users who need a modern, low-power platform with better integrated graphics should pick the i3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-1115G4E | Intel Core i7-10610U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 2 | 4 |

| Threads | 4 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.20 GHz | 1800.00 MHz (1.80 GHz) |

| Boost clock | 3.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Tiger Lake | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Tiger Lake-U | Comet Lake-U |

| Process node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4, LPDDR4X | DDR3, DDR4 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics G4 48EU | UHD Graphics |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2020-09-01 | 2020-04-01 |

| Launch MSRP | $285 | Not recorded |

The most consequential differences are the ones that matter most to performance. The i7 has twice the cores and threads, a 1.0 GHz higher boost clock, and 2 MB more L3 cache. The i3 has a newer 10 nm process, PCIe Gen 4, more L1 and L2 per core, and a 10 W lower TDP. The i7 is the faster processor in every recorded benchmark; the i3 is the more modern, efficient design.