Intel Core i3-1115G4E vs Intel Core i5-4670S Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear split between the two processors across the eight benchmark tests. The Intel Core i3-1115G4E wins seven of the eight head-to-head comparisons, but the one loss is substantial, and the wins are mostly narrow.

Starting with single-core performance, the i3-1115G4E demonstrates a commanding lead. In Geekbench single-core, it scores 1702 against the i5-4670S's 1184, a 43.8% advantage. This is the largest margin in either direction across all tests. The Cinebench single-core results reinforce this pattern, though with much smaller gaps: R15 single-core is a tie at 63 for both, R20 single-core goes to the i3 at 266 versus 263 (1.1% ahead), and R23 single-core sees the i3 at 634 versus 628 (1.0% ahead).

Multi-core results tell a more nuanced story. In the Cinebench suite, the i3-1115G4E wins every multi-core test, but by margins under 1%. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 452 versus 448 (0.9% ahead), R20 multi-core shows 1887 versus 1870 (0.9% ahead), and R23 multi-core shows 4493 versus 4454 (0.9% ahead). These are statistically minor differences, indicating near parity in sustained multi-threaded rendering workloads.

The single decisive defeat for the i3 comes in Geekbench multi-core, where the i5-4670S scores 3300 versus 2972, a 9.9% advantage. This is the only test where the older desktop chip wins, and it wins by a wide margin. The i5's four physical cores, versus the i3's two cores with Hyper-Threading, likely explain this divergence, although the benchmark data itself does not specify the cause.

The average benchmark score for the i3-1115G4E is 1559, placing it in the 39th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The i5-4670S averages 1526, placing it in the 38th percentile. The i3's nearest rivals include the AMD Opteron 6276 (avg 1560, 0.1% behind), the AMD FX-8350 (avg 1557, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5 (avg 1557, 0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X (avg 1562, 0.2% behind). The i5's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-7440HQ (avg 1527, 0% delta), the Intel Pentium Gold G7400E (avg 1524, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon E5-1428L v2 (avg 1537, 0.7% behind), and the Intel Core i7-8665U (avg 1513, 0.9% ahead). These proximity bands show both chips sitting in the same general performance tier relative to the broader database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, built on the Willow Cove-U core generation. The i5-4670S uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process node. The process node difference is significant: 10 nm versus 22 nm represents two full generations of Intel manufacturing technology.

The i3-1115G4E has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the i5-4670S has 4 cores and 4 threads. The i3 relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach 4 threads, while the i5 uses native quad-core execution without hyper-threading. Base clocks differ: the i3 runs at 2.20 GHz base and 3.90 GHz boost, while the i5 runs at 3.10 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost. Despite the lower base clock, the i3's higher boost clock and newer architecture allow it to match or exceed the i5 in most tests.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The i3-1115G4E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-4670S has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i3's larger per-core L2 cache is notable, though both chips share the same total L3 capacity.

Memory support varies by platform. The i3 supports DDR4 and LPDDR4X in a dual-channel configuration. The i5 supports DDR3 in a dual-channel configuration. The i3 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 4 CPU lanes, while the i5 uses PCIe Gen 3. The i3's integrated graphics are UHD Graphics G4 with 48 execution units, while the i5 uses Intel HD 4600.

Physical specifications differ as well. The i3-1115G4E has a die size of 144 mm², while the i5-4670S has a die size of 177 mm² and contains 1,400 million transistors. The i3's die size is recorded without a transistor count. Thermal design power is dramatically different: the i3 is rated at 15 watts (mobile segment), while the i5 is rated at 65 watts (desktop segment). The i3 uses an Intel BGA 1449 socket, while the i5 uses Intel Socket 1150.

The i3 launched in September 2020 with a launch MSRP of $285. The i5 launched in June 2013 with no recorded launch MSRP. The i3 remains in active production, while the i5's production status is not recorded. Both processors have locked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core Geekbench score?

A: The Intel Core i3-1115G4E scores 1702 in Geekbench single-core, which is 43.8% higher than the i5-4670S's score of 1184. This is the largest performance gap in any benchmark between the two.

Q: Does the i5-4670S win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the i5-4670S wins the Geekbench multi-core test with a score of 3300, compared to the i3-1115G4E's 2972. This represents a 9.9% advantage for the i5.

Q: How do the Cinebench multi-core scores compare?

A: The i3-1115G4E wins all three Cinebench multi-core tests, but by narrow margins. R15 shows 452 versus 448 (0.9% ahead), R20 shows 1887 versus 1870 (0.9% ahead), and R23 shows 4493 versus 4454 (0.9% ahead).

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The i3-1115G4E has 2 cores and 4 threads. The i5-4670S has 4 cores and 4 threads. The i3 achieves 4 threads through hyper-threading, while the i5 uses native 4-core execution.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The i3-1115G4E boosts to 3.90 GHz, while the i5-4670S boosts to 3.80 GHz. The i3 also has a lower base clock at 2.20 GHz versus the i5's 3.10 GHz.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores rank these CPUs?

A: The i3-1115G4E has an average benchmark score of 1559, placing it in the 39th percentile. The i5-4670S has an average score of 1526, placing it in the 38th percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i3-1115G4E | Intel Core i5-4670S |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 2 | 4 |

| Threads | 4 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.90 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Tiger Lake | Haswell |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 22 nm |

| Die Size | 144 mm² | 177 mm² |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 1,400 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, LPDDR4X | DDR3 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics G4 48EU | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2020-09-01 | 2013-06-01 |

| Launch MSRP | $285 | Not recorded |

| Production Status | Active | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRK12 | SR14K |

Where Each One Wins

The i3-1115G4E wins in every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, across all three versions (R15, R20, R23). It also wins Geekbench single-core by a massive 43.8% margin. The data suggests this processor excels in tasks that rely on per-thread performance and modern instruction efficiency. Its higher boost clock, newer architecture, and larger per-core L2 cache likely contribute to these results, though the benchmark data itself does not isolate causal factors.

The i5-4670S wins only Geekbench multi-core, but by a decisive 9.9%. This indicates an advantage in heavily parallel workloads that can utilize four physical cores without hyper-threading overhead. The i5's higher base clock (3.10 GHz versus 2.20 GHz) and four native cores provide a sustained multi-threaded advantage in at least one major benchmark suite.

The overall win count is 7 for the i3 and 1 for the i5. However, the margin of victory matters. The i3's wins are mostly around 1% or less, while the i5's single win is nearly 10%. For users prioritizing single-core responsiveness, the i3 is the clear choice. For users with workloads that scale across multiple cores and benefit from physical core count, the i5 shows a specific strength in Geekbench multi-core.

The Verdict

The data supports a nuanced conclusion. The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is the better overall processor based on benchmark wins, taking 7 of 8 tests and posting a higher average benchmark score (1559 versus 1526). Its single-core advantage is particularly pronounced in Geekbench, where it leads by 43.8%. It also achieves these results at a dramatically lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts, making it far more power-efficient for mobile platforms.

The Intel Core i5-4670S retains relevance for multi-core Geekbench workloads, where its 9.9% lead is the largest margin recorded in either direction. Its four physical cores and higher base clock provide genuine multi-threaded capability that the i3 cannot match in that specific test. The i5 also uses the older Socket 1150 platform and DDR3 memory, which may be relevant for users with existing desktop hardware.

For mobile users, the i3-1115G4E is the logical pick. It offers better single-core performance, comparable Cinebench multi-core results, lower power consumption, and a newer platform with DDR4/LPDDR4X support and PCIe Gen 4. For desktop users with workloads that mirror Geekbench multi-core, the i5-4670S delivers a measurable advantage, though it sacrifices single-core performance, efficiency, and platform longevity. The overall percentile rankings place both chips within one point of each other (39th versus 38th), confirming that these are closely matched processors despite their architectural differences.