Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Core i5-4330M Comparison

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 and Intel Core i5-4330M are both 2-core, 4-thread mobile processors, but they come from different eras of Intel's design philosophy. The data shows a clear and consistent performance gap, with the newer Tiger Lake chip winning every single benchmark in the comparison. The i3-1110G4 achieves a 17.5% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core (322 vs. 274) and a nearly identical 17.4% advantage in Cinebench R20 multi-core (1344 vs. 1145). This pattern holds across all tested workloads, making the i3-1110G4 the definitive choice for raw compute performance in this head-to-head.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are remarkably consistent, with the i3-1110G4 winning all five compared tests by a margin of roughly 17.4% to 17.5%. This uniformity suggests the performance difference is architectural rather than workload-specific. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i3-1110G4 scores 322 against the i5-4330M's 274, a 17.5% improvement. The single-core results tell the same story, though the only direct single-core comparison available is in Cinebench R20, where the i3-1110G4 posts 189 versus 161 for the i5-4330M, again a 17.4% difference.

The newer chip extends its lead in the more demanding Cinebench R23 tests. In multi-core, the i3-1110G4 scores 3202 compared to 2727 for the i5-4330M, a 17.4% advantage. The R23 single-core test shows 452 for the i3-1110G4 and 385 for the i5-4330M, maintaining that same 17.4% gap. These results indicate that the i3-1110G4's performance advantage is not merely a factor of higher boost clocks or thermal headroom in short bursts; it scales equally across sustained multi-threaded workloads and short single-threaded bursts.

The i5-4330M does not win a single benchmark in this comparison, with a 0-5 record. Its best showing is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it trails by the smallest relative margin of 17.5%. Given that both processors have identical core and thread counts, the performance delta comes entirely from the i3-1110G4's superior per-clock efficiency and memory subsystem. The i5-4330M's higher base clock of 2.80 GHz compared to the i3-1110G4's 1.80 GHz cannot compensate for the architectural generational leap, as the i3-1110G4 still manages to outperform it by a wide margin.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Core i3-1110G4 is the superior processor in every measurable way. Any user comparing these two for a laptop purchase or upgrade should select the i3-1110G4, as it offers a consistent 17.4% performance uplift across both single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests. The i5-4330M, despite its higher base clock and older Haswell heritage, simply cannot keep pace with the newer Tiger Lake architecture. The 17.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core (3202 vs. 2727) is particularly telling for users who run heavily threaded applications, as it represents a substantial real-world difference in render times or scientific computing workloads.

The i5-4330M is not without its merits, but they do not appear in the benchmark data. It holds a 25th percentile ranking among all CPUs, identical to the i3-1110G4, meaning both sit in the lower range of overall processor performance. However, the i3-1110G4 achieves that same percentile with significantly newer technology and a much lower thermal design power of 15 watts versus 37 watts for the i5-4330M. If the choice is purely based on benchmark scores, the i3-1110G4 is the only rational pick. The i5-4330M would only be relevant if the user has a specific motherboard or socket requirement, but from a pure performance standpoint, the newer chip wins decisively.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Core i3-1110G4 is built on Tiger Lake-U, using a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core i5-4330M is based on the older Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process. This process node difference is a primary driver of the performance-per-watt gap, as the i3-1110G4 delivers significantly higher performance while consuming less than half the power (15 W TDP vs. 37 W). The i3-1110G4 also uses the Willow Cove core microarchitecture, while the i5-4330M uses the original Haswell core design.

Cache configurations differ meaningfully. The i3-1110G4 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-4330M has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and only 3 MB of shared L3. The i3-1110G4's larger L3 cache is likely a significant factor in its 17.4% performance advantage, as it allows more data to be stored closer to the cores, reducing memory latency. The i5-4330M's smaller cache is a consequence of its older design and larger 22 nm transistors, with the die size listed at 118 mm² and 1,400 million transistors.

Memory support also diverges. The i3-1110G4 supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The i5-4330M supports DDR3 memory, with no memory bus or bandwidth data provided in the pack. The newer chip's support for faster DDR4 memory, combined with its higher bandwidth, gives it a clear advantage in memory-bound workloads. Additionally, the i3-1110G4 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i5-4330M has no PCIe data listed, suggesting it relies on an older PCIe standard. The integrated graphics also differ, with the i3-1110G4 featuring Iris Xe Graphics G4 and the i5-4330M using Intel HD 5000.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-4330M has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The i3-1110G4 is 0.10 GHz higher.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-1110G4 and the Intel Core i5-4330M have 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance difference between the two in the benchmark data?

A: The largest difference is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the Intel Core i3-1110G4 is 17.5% faster than the Intel Core i5-4330M (322 vs. 274).

Q: Which processor has a lower thermal design power (TDP)?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a TDP of 15 watts, which is significantly lower than the Intel Core i5-4330M's 37 watts.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has an average benchmark score of 945, while the Intel Core i5-4330M has an average score of 938. The i3-1110G4 is slightly higher.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 supports DDR4 memory, while the Intel Core i5-4330M supports DDR3 memory.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins in every single benchmark category tested, making it the clear winner for all compute-heavy tasks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, its 3202 score versus 2727 makes it the better choice for 3D rendering, video encoding, and any other workload that scales across multiple threads. Its 452 single-core score in R23 also makes it preferable for everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light photo editing, where single-thread performance is critical. The 17.4% single-core advantage means snappier application launches and more responsive overall system behavior.

The i5-4330M's only potential advantage lies outside the benchmark data. Its higher base clock of 2.80 GHz could theoretically provide better sustained performance under continuous load if the i3-1110G4's lower base clock of 1.80 GHz were to throttle, but the benchmark results show the i3-1110G4 maintaining its lead even in multi-core tests, which are more likely to trigger thermal limits. The i5-4330M might also be the only choice for users with a motherboard that exclusively supports the Intel Socket G3, as the i3-1110G4 requires the Intel BGA 1598 socket. However, for any user building or buying a new system, the i3-1110G4 is the superior performer in all measured aspects.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-4330M has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The i3-1110G4 runs on a 10 nm process node, while the i5-4330M uses a 22 nm node. The i3-1110G4 has a TDP of 15 watts, compared to 37 watts for the i5-4330M. Socket types differ: the i3-1110G4 uses Intel BGA 1598, and the i5-4330M uses Intel Socket G3.

Cache configuration is another major difference. The i3-1110G4 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The i5-4330M has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 3 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs, with the i3-1110G4 using DDR4 and the i5-4330M using DDR3. The i3-1110G4 has a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the i5-4330M has no memory bandwidth or PCIe data listed. Integrated graphics also differ: the i3-1110G4 has Iris Xe Graphics G4, and the i5-4330M has Intel HD 5000. The i5-4330M lists a die size of 118 mm² and 1,400 million transistors, while the i3-1110G4 has no such data. Finally, the release dates differ, with the i3-1110G4 released in September 2020 and the i5-4330M released in August 2013.