Intel Core i3-10325 vs Intel Core i5-1155G7 Comparison

The Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Core i5-1155G7 are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they are engineered for entirely different computing environments. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the desktop-oriented i3-10325 outperforms the mobile i5-1155G7 in every single benchmark recorded, though the i5-1155G7 counters with a more modern platform and a significantly more powerful integrated GPU. The benchmark results indicate a consistent, narrow victory for the i3-10325 across all Cinebench tests, with the i5-1155G7’s strengths lying in its architecture and feature set rather than raw compute scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core i3-10325 wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, but the margins are remarkably uniform. In Cinebench R15, the i3-10325 scores 881 in multi-core against the i5-1155G7’s 822, a 7.2% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar story: 124 for the i3-10325 versus 115 for the i5-1155G7, which translates to a 7.8% lead. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20, where the i3-10325 posts 3673 multi-core and 518 single-core, while the i5-1155G7 manages 3425 and 483, respectively—both results again showing a 7.2% gap.

The latest Cinebench R23 test reinforces this trend. The i3-10325 achieves 8747 multi-core and 1234 single-core, while the i5-1155G7 trails at 8155 and 1151. The multi-core delta is 7.3%, and the single-core delta is 7.2%. The consistency of these margins—hovering between 7.2% and 7.8% across every test—suggests that the performance difference is structural rather than workload-dependent. The i3-10325’s higher base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to the i5-1155G7’s 2.50 GHz and 4.50 GHz, likely drive this uniform advantage.

Despite these losses, the i5-1155G7 does have its own data points to consider. The i5-1155G7 has two Geekbench scores not recorded for the i3-10325: 4246 multi-core and 1574 single-core. These scores cannot be directly compared here, but they establish a baseline for the mobile chip’s performance in that specific test suite. The i3-10325’s average benchmark score is 2530, while the i5-1155G7’s is 2496, placing both processors at the 49th percentile among all CPUs. The i3-10325’s nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E-2244G (2527, +0.1%) and the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 (2545, -0.6%), while the i5-1155G7 sits near the Intel Core i5-9500T (2493, +0.1%) and the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 (2507, -0.4%). This positioning shows both chips are mid-pack performers, with the i3-10325 holding a slight edge in average score.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-10325 is the faster processor in every recorded benchmark. For workloads that rely on CPU compute—such as rendering, compiling, or heavy multitasking—the i3-10325 delivers a 7.2% to 7.8% improvement over the i5-1155G7 across all Cinebench tests. The i3-10325’s 65W TDP and desktop Socket 1200 design allow it to sustain higher clock speeds, and its boost clock of 4.70 GHz is 200 MHz higher than the i5-1155G7’s. This makes the i3-10325 the clear choice for users building a desktop system where performance per clock is the priority.

However, the i5-1155G7 is not without merit. Its 28W TDP and mobile BGA 1449 socket make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, and its integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 80EU is far more capable than the i3-10325’s UHD Graphics 630. The i5-1155G7 also supports LPDDR4X memory, a feature absent from the i3-10325’s DDR4-only spec, and offers PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus the i3-10325’s PCIe Gen 3. The i5-1155G7’s newer 10 nm process node and larger 144 mm² die size indicate a more modern architecture, even if the benchmark scores don’t reflect a performance advantage.

In summary, the i3-10325 wins on raw compute, while the i5-1155G7 wins on platform modernity and integrated graphics. The choice depends on whether the user prioritizes CPU performance (pick the i3-10325) or portability and GPU capability (pick the i5-1155G7). The i3-10325’s launch MSRP was $154, compared to the i5-1155G7’s $309, further cementing the desktop chip as the performance-per-dollar leader in this comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i3-10325 scores 8747, while the Intel Core i5-1155G7 scores 8155, giving the i3-10325 a 7.3% advantage.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Cinebench R15?

A: The i3-10325 scores 124, and the i5-1155G7 scores 115, resulting in a 7.8% lead for the i3-10325.

Q: Does the i5-1155G7 have any benchmark scores not available for the i3-10325?

A: Yes, the i5-1155G7 has Geekbench scores of 4246 multi-core and 1574 single-core, which are not listed for the i3-10325 in the data.

Q: How do these processors compare in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The i3-10325 averages 2530, while the i5-1155G7 averages 2496, a difference of 34 points. Both sit at the 49th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor offers a more capable integrated GPU?

A: The i5-1155G7 features Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 80EU, which is a more advanced integrated solution than the i3-10325’s UHD Graphics 630.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the i5-1155G7 wins?

A: No, the data shows zero wins for the i5-1155G7 in the six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons. The i3-10325 wins all six.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several core specifications. The i3-10325 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the i5-1155G7 runs at 2.50 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. The i3-10325 has a TDP of 65W, versus the i5-1155G7’s 28W. The socket types are entirely different: the i3-10325 uses Intel Socket 1200, while the i5-1155G7 uses Intel BGA 1449, making them incompatible with the same motherboards.

Memory support differs as well: the i3-10325 supports DDR4 only, while the i5-1155G7 supports both DDR4 and LPDDR4X. The i3-10325 has a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the i5-1155G7’s memory bandwidth is not listed. PCIe support also varies, with the i3-10325 offering Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the i5-1155G7 offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The market segments are split: the i3-10325 is a Desktop processor, while the i5-1155G7 is Mobile. Their launch dates are also different, with the i3-10325 releasing on 2021-03-15 and the i5-1155G7 on 2021-05-30. The launch MSRP for the i3-10325 was $154, and for the i5-1155G7 it was $309.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is significant. The i3-10325 uses the Comet Lake architecture (codename Comet Lake-R) built on Intel’s 14 nm process node. The i5-1155G7 uses the Tiger Lake architecture (codename Tiger Lake-U) on a smaller 10 nm process node. The die size differs, with the i5-1155G7 measured at 144 mm², while the i3-10325’s die size is not listed.

Cache configurations are notably different. The i3-10325 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, while the i5-1155G7 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. Both share 8 MB of L3 cache. This means the i5-1155G7 has a substantially larger L2 cache, which can improve performance in certain workloads, though the benchmark data does not reflect a net win for the mobile chip.

The integrated graphics also represent a major architectural divergence. The i3-10325 uses UHD Graphics 630, while the i5-1155G7 uses Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 80EU, which is a more modern and capable GPU solution. The i5-1155G7’s architecture is designed for mobile efficiency, as evidenced by its lower TDP and support for LPDDR4X memory, while the i3-10325’s architecture prioritizes sustained desktop performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-10325 wins in every CPU-bound benchmark category. It is the superior choice for desktop users who need maximum multi-threaded and single-threaded performance in Cinebench workloads. The data shows a 7.2% to 7.8% advantage across all tests, making it the clear pick for tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation where every point of CPU performance matters. Its higher clock speeds and 65W TDP allow it to maintain performance under sustained loads, which is critical for desktop workstations.

The Intel Core i5-1155G7 wins in the mobile and integrated-graphics domains. Although it loses all six Cinebench comparisons, it offers a lower 28W TDP, making it suitable for laptops where battery life and thermal management are priorities. Its Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 80EU is a significantly more capable integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 630, allowing for better casual gaming and media playback without a discrete graphics card. The i5-1155G7 also supports PCIe Gen 4, which provides faster data transfer for modern SSDs and GPUs, and its support for LPDDR4X memory enables more power-efficient system designs. For users who need a portable system with better graphics and a newer architecture, the i5-1155G7 is the logical choice, even though it trails in raw CPU benchmarks.