Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Core i5-5350U Comparison

The Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Core i5-5350U are both 14 nm dual-core mobile processors with four threads, yet they represent different eras of Intel’s design philosophy. The i3-10110Y, built on the newer Comet Lake-Y architecture, posts a higher average benchmark score of 908 compared to the i5-5350U’s 903. Both chips sit at the 24th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they occupy a similar performance tier despite their generational gap. The data shows a clear sweep in head-to-head testing, with the i3-10110Y winning all five Cinebench comparisons by a consistent margin of roughly 20%.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the benchmark data is the uniformity of the i3-10110Y’s victory. Across every Cinebench test—both single-core and multi-core—the newer chip leads by a delta of approximately 20%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i3-10110Y scores 265 against the i5-5350U’s 221, a 19.9% advantage. This margin expands slightly to exactly 20% in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the scores are 1108 versus 923.

Single-core performance tells the same story. The i3-10110Y achieves 156 in Cinebench R20 single-core, while the i5-5350U manages 130—again a 20% gap. In Cinebench R23, the newer chip scores 372 single-core versus 310 for the older part, holding that 20% edge. The multi-core R23 result is 2640 for the i3-10110Y and 2198 for the i5-5350U, a 20.1% difference. These are not marginal wins; they represent a substantial generational uplift in both throughput and latency-sensitive workloads.

The i5-5350U does have one advantage in the broader data: it includes Geekbench scores, which are absent for the i3-10110Y. In Geekbench multi-core, the i5-5350U scores 1671, and in single-core it scores 868. Without a corresponding i3-10110Y Geekbench result, this cannot be compared directly, but it does show the i5-5350U’s baseline capability in a different benchmark suite.

What the numbers reveal is that the i3-10110Y’s higher boost clock—4.00 GHz versus 2.90 GHz—translates into a decisive performance lead. The i5-5350U’s higher base clock of 1800 MHz compared to 1000 MHz does not compensate for the i3-10110Y’s superior turbo headroom. In every measured Cinebench scenario, the newer architecture’s ability to sustain higher clocks under load wins out.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families with distinct design goals. The i3-10110Y is built on Comet Lake, specifically the Comet Lake-Y variant, and belongs to Intel’s 10th generation Core series. The i5-5350U is a Broadwell part, designated Broadwell-U, from the 5th generation. Both use a 14 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel, but the underlying microarchitecture has evolved significantly between them.

Cache configuration differs notably. Each core in both chips has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2, but the shared L3 cache is larger on the i3-10110Y at 4 MB, compared to 3 MB on the i5-5350U. This extra 1 MB of L3 cache can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data, contributing to the i3-10110Y’s performance edge. The i5-5350U does have documented transistor and die size figures—1,900 million transistors on a 133 mm² die—while these are not listed for the i3-10110Y.

Memory support is identical in type—both support DDR3—but the i5-5350U has more detailed specifications. It features dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s, while the i3-10110Y’s memory bus and bandwidth are not specified in the data. The i5-5350U also lists PCIe Gen 2 support with 12 lanes (CPU only), a detail absent for the i3-10110Y. Integrated graphics differ as well: the i3-10110Y uses UHD Graphics, while the i5-5350U has Intel HD 6000.

Power and packaging reveal their different market positions. The i3-10110Y has a TDP of just 9 watts, making it an ultra-low-power part, while the i5-5350U is rated at 15 watts. The i3-10110Y uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket, whereas the i5-5350U uses Intel BGA 1168. Production status also differs: the i3-10110Y is listed as Active, while the i5-5350U is End-of-life. Release dates confirm the generational gap—the i3-10110Y launched in August 2019, over four years after the i5-5350U’s February 2015 debut.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-10110Y is the faster processor in every measured Cinebench workload. It wins multi-core by margins between 19.9% and 20.1%, and single-core by exactly 20%. This consistency suggests a fundamental architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The i3-10110Y’s higher boost clock and larger L3 cache are the most likely drivers of this lead.

For users prioritizing raw compute performance in Cinebench-style workloads, the i3-10110Y is the clear choice. It delivers more than 20% higher scores while consuming only 9 watts of power, compared to the i5-5350U’s 15 watts. This efficiency advantage, combined with its active production status, makes the i3-10110Y a more future-proof option for new designs.

The i5-5350U is not without merit from a historical perspective. It offers documented memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s and PCIe Gen 2 connectivity, features that are unspecified for the i3-10110Y. Its Geekbench scores of 1671 multi-core and 868 single-core demonstrate solid performance for its era. However, in a direct comparison, the i5-5350U trails in all shared benchmarks, and its end-of-life status limits its practical appeal. The data supports choosing the i3-10110Y for any application where Cinebench performance matters.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The i3-10110Y has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the i5-5350U runs at 1800 MHz base and 2.90 GHz boost. TDP is another clear differentiator: 9 watts for the i3-10110Y versus 15 watts for the i5-5350U. Socket types are incompatible—Intel BGA 1440 for the i3-10110Y and Intel BGA 1168 for the i5-5350U.

Cache and architecture details diverge as well. The i3-10110Y has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, 1 MB more than the i5-5350U’s 3 MB. The i3-10110Y is built on Comet Lake-Y, while the i5-5350U uses Broadwell-U. The i5-5350U lists 1,900 million transistors and a 133 mm² die size, neither of which is available for the i3-10110Y. Memory support is DDR3 for both, but the i5-5350U specifies dual-channel operation with 29.9 GB/s bandwidth, while the i3-10110Y’s memory bus is not listed. The i5-5350U also has PCIe Gen 2 with 12 lanes; the i3-10110Y has no PCIe data.

Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics on the i3-10110Y versus Intel HD 6000 on the i5-5350U. The i5-5350U has a launch MSRP of $315, while no MSRP is listed for the i3-10110Y. Production status separates them—Active for the i3-10110Y and End-of-life for the i5-5350U. The i5-5350U has a part number (SR268), and its release date is February 2015, versus August 2019 for the i3-10110Y. Both processors have locked multipliers and do not support ECC memory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core Cinebench tests?

A: The Intel Core i3-10110Y wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. In R15, it scores 265 versus 221 for the i5-5350U (19.9% higher). In R20, it scores 1108 versus 923 (20% higher), and in R23, 2640 versus 2198 (20.1% higher).

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: The i3-10110Y also leads in single-core. It scores 156 in Cinebench R20 single-core versus 130 for the i5-5350U, and 372 versus 310 in R23—both exactly 20% higher.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two chips?

A: The i3-10110Y has a TDP of 9 watts, while the i5-5350U is rated at 15 watts. The i3-10110Y delivers higher performance while consuming 6 fewer watts.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 2 cores and 4 threads. The performance difference comes from other factors like clock speeds and cache size, not core count.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The i3-10110Y has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 3 MB on the i5-5350U. Both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core.

Q: Is the i5-5350U still in production?

A: No, the i5-5350U is listed as End-of-life, while the i3-10110Y is marked as Active. The i5-5350U was released in February 2015, and the i3-10110Y in August 2019.

Where Each One Wins

The i3-10110Y wins in every shared benchmark category. Its dominance spans multi-core workloads, where it leads by roughly 20% in both R15 and R23, and single-core workloads, where it maintains the same margin. This makes it the superior choice for any application that relies on Cinebench-style rendering or CPU-bound computations. Its lower TDP of 9 watts also gives it an efficiency advantage, making it suitable for passively cooled or ultra-portable designs where power draw is critical.

The i5-5350U’s strengths are less about raw performance and more about documented platform features. It offers dual-channel memory with a specified bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s, which the i3-10110Y does not list. It also includes PCIe Gen 2 with 12 lanes, providing a defined expansion path. For legacy systems or applications that require these specific connectivity options, the i5-5350U may still be relevant, despite its end-of-life status. Its Geekbench scores—1671 multi-core and 868 single-core—provide an additional data point for users who rely on that benchmark suite.

In practical terms, the i3-10110Y is the winner for new projects requiring the best available Cinebench performance at minimal power. The i5-5350U’s role is limited to scenarios where its specific memory and PCIe specifications are needed, or where the presence of Geekbench data is a deciding factor. The benchmark results are decisive: 5 wins for the i3-10110Y, 0 for the i5-5350U.