Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Core i5-4288U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a remarkably consistent picture: the Intel Core i3-10110Y wins every recorded head-to-head test against the Intel Core i5-4288U. Across five Cinebench workloads, the newer part holds a near-uniform advantage of roughly 15%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i3-10110Y scores 265 versus 225 for the i5-4288U, a delta of 15.1%. That gap repeats almost exactly in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the i3 posts 1108 against 939, a 15.3% lead. The single-core tests tell the same story: the i3-10110Y reaches 156 in Cinebench R20 single-core and 372 in R23 single-core, while the i5-4288U manages 132 and 315 respectively, each time trailing by 15.3% or 15.4%.

The most striking aspect is the consistency. From the older R15 workload to the more demanding R23 suite, the i3-10110Y’s advantage never dips below 15.1% and never exceeds 15.4%. This is not a case of one workload favoring a particular architecture; it is a systemic performance gap. The i5-4288U’s best showing is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it closes the gap to 15.1%, but even there it still loses decisively. The i3-10110Y’s win tally stands at 5, with zero victories for the i5-4288U in the recorded head-to-head comparisons.

Looking at the broader database context, the i5-4288U holds a 25th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 927. The i3-10110Y sits just below at the 24th percentile, with an average score of 908. Despite losing every direct comparison, the i5-4288U actually edges out its rival in the aggregate database average, a quirk explained by the fact that the i5 was tested across more workloads, including Geekbench, where it scores 1745 multi-core and 896 single-core. The i3-10110Y lacks Geekbench entries in the recorded data, so its average is computed solely from Cinebench results. This discrepancy does not change the head-to-head outcome, but it does explain why the lower-scoring chip in direct tests can still show a higher overall average.

The nearest rivals for each chip further contextualize the results. The i5-4288U’s closest competitor, the Core i7-4600U, scores 931, a mere 0.5% above the i5. The i3-10110Y’s nearest rival, the Core i3-4330T, scores exactly 908, matching the i3 with a 0% delta. This suggests both chips are anchored in the same performance tier, yet the i3-10110Y consistently extracts more from the Cinebench suite.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras of Intel’s mobile lineup. The i5-4288U is built on the Haswell architecture, a 22 nm design with 1,400 million transistors on a 118 mm² die. It uses the Intel BGA 1168 socket and was released in June 2013. The i3-10110Y belongs to the Comet Lake generation, specifically Comet Lake-Y, built on a 14 nm process. It uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket and launched in August 2019. The process node shrink from 22 nm to 14 nm is a significant architectural leap, though the transistor count and die size for the i3 are not recorded in the database.

Both chips feature 2 cores and 4 threads, a configuration that has remained a constant across six years of Intel mobile parts. The cache hierarchy shows a subtle difference: both have 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, but the i3-10110Y doubles the shared L3 cache to 4 MB, versus 3 MB on the i5-4288U. That extra megabyte of L3 is a plausible contributor to the i3’s consistent 15% lead, as it allows more working data to stay closer to the cores.

Clock speeds reveal a more dramatic split. The i5-4288U runs at a 2.60 GHz base clock with a 3.10 GHz boost. The i3-10110Y lists a base clock of 1000.00 GHz in the database, which is clearly a typographical artifact; the boost clock is recorded as 4.00 GHz. Even ignoring the anomalous base figure, the 4.00 GHz boost is substantially higher than the i5’s 3.10 GHz, giving the i3 a 29% higher maximum clock. This clock advantage, combined with the larger L3 cache, explains why the i3 wins every single-core test by the same margin it wins multi-core tests.

Thermal design power separates the two even further. The i5-4288U draws 28 watts, while the i3-10110Y is rated at just 9 watts. That is a 19-watt difference, a massive reduction in power consumption for the newer part. Both use DDR3 memory, neither supports ECC, and both lack an unlocked multiplier. The i5 ships with Intel HD 5100 integrated graphics; the i3 ships with UHD Graphics. The i5 has a recorded part number (SR189), while the i3’s part number is not listed. The i3 is marked as “Active” in production status, whereas the i5’s status is not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-10110Y wins every recorded single-core test. In Cinebench R20 single-core, it scores 156 against 132 for the i5-4288U, a 15.4% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 372 versus 315, a 15.3% lead.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core workloads?

A: The i3-10110Y also wins all multi-core tests. Cinebench R15 shows 265 versus 225 (15.1% difference), R20 shows 1108 versus 939 (15.3%), and R23 shows 2640 versus 2237 (15.3%). The i5-4288U does not win a single recorded multi-core test.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes, both have 2 cores and 4 threads. The difference lies elsewhere: the i3-10110Y has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-4288U has 3 MB.

Q: Which chip consumes less power?

A: The i3-10110Y is rated at 9 watts TDP, compared to 28 watts for the i5-4288U. The newer part uses 19 watts less under its thermal design envelope.

Q: What are the release dates for these processors?

A: The i5-4288U was released in June 2013, and the i3-10110Y launched in August 2019, a gap of roughly six years.

Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both have the multiplierUnlocked field set to false, meaning neither supports unlocked multiplier adjustments.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-4288U | Intel Core i3-10110Y |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Haswell | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Haswell | Comet Lake-Y |

| Generation | Core i5 (Haswell) | Core i3 (Comet Lake-Y) |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Transistors | 1,400 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 118 mm² | Not recorded |

| L3 Cache | 3 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 1000.00 GHz (listed) |

| Boost Clock | 3.10 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 9 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1168 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5100 | UHD Graphics |

| Release Date | June 2013 | August 2019 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |

| Part Number | SR189 | Not recorded |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-10110Y wins every benchmark category recorded in the head-to-head data. Its strengths are clear in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 4.00 GHz boost clock gives it a substantial frequency advantage over the i5-4288U’s 3.10 GHz, and the larger 4 MB L3 cache helps feed those cores more efficiently. If the task is Cinebench rendering of any version, whether R15, R20, or R23, the i3-10110Y is the better choice by a consistent margin of about 15%.

The i5-4288U does have one area where it stands out in the database: its average benchmark score. At 927, it edges the i3-10110Y’s 908, thanks to additional Geekbench results that are not available for the i3. In Geekbench, the i5 scores 1745 multi-core and 896 single-core, numbers that are not part of the head-to-head comparison but do raise its aggregate standing. The i5 also has a slightly higher percentile ranking, at 25 versus 24 for the i3. For a user running mixed workloads that include Geekbench-style tests, the i5-4288U might hold a narrow overall edge in the database average, but that is a statistical artifact of missing data rather than a direct performance win.

For most practical purposes, the i3-10110Y is the superior processor. It delivers higher scores in every recorded Cinebench test, it consumes one-third of the power (9 watts versus 28 watts), and it comes from a newer process node. The i5-4288U’s only claim to a win is its broader benchmark coverage and the slight aggregate average lead that results from it. In a direct competition, the i3-10110Y takes the crown in all five head-to-head matchups, and the data does not support any scenario where the i5-4288U outperforms it in a rendering workload. The i5 might be a reasonable part for legacy Haswell-era systems, but the i3-10110Y is the clear benchmark champion between these two mobile chips.