Intel Core i3-10110U vs Intel Core i5-3570T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-3570T and Intel Core i3-10110U represent two very different approaches to computing, separated by seven years of architectural evolution. The data shows a clear split: the older Ivy Bridge desktop chip wins 5 of 7 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, but the newer Comet Lake mobile part dominates in Geekbench, particularly in single-core performance. The i5-3570T edges out the i3-10110U in every Cinebench test, with margins ranging from 1.5% to 2.1%, while the i3-10110U delivers a 50.8% lead in Geekbench single-core and a 20.4% lead in Geekbench multi-core. Both processors sit at the 32nd percentile of all CPUs, with average benchmark scores of 1136 and 1131 respectively, making them effectively equivalent in overall standing despite their contrasting strengths.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-3570T is the pick for sustained multi-threaded workloads that rely on Cinebench-style rendering, as it holds a consistent, if narrow, advantage across all four Cinebench variants. Its 4 cores and 4 threads, combined with a 6 MB shared L3 cache, give it a structural edge in these tests, even though its 2.30 GHz base and 3.30 GHz boost clocks are lower than the i3-10110U’s figures. The i5-3570T wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 1.5%, R20 multi-core by 1.8%, R20 single-core by 2.1%, R23 multi-core by 1.8%, and R23 single-core by 2.0%. For users running older software or applications that scale with physical cores, this desktop part is the safer choice.

The Intel Core i3-10110U is the clear winner for general-purpose responsiveness and single-threaded tasks, as evidenced by its massive Geekbench lead. The 50.8% advantage in Geekbench single-core (1174 vs 578) and 20.4% advantage in Geekbench multi-core (2143 vs 1705) reflect the newer Comet Lake architecture’s superior IPC and the boost clock reaching 4.10 GHz. This mobile chip, despite having only 2 cores and 4 threads, outperforms the 4-core i5-3570T in Geekbench multi-core, which suggests that its architectural efficiency more than compensates for the core deficit in this particular benchmark. For everyday computing, web browsing, and office tasks, the i3-10110U is the better performer.

The verdict depends entirely on workload. If the benchmark suite emphasizes Cinebench-style rendering, the i5-3570T wins. If it emphasizes Geekbench-style mixed workloads, the i3-10110U wins decisively. The data does not support a universal recommendation; it supports a workload-specific one. Neither chip is unlocked for overclocking, and both lack ECC memory support. The i5-3570T is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1155, while the i3-10110U is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1440, so platform compatibility will likely dictate the choice before performance considerations come into play.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570T has an average benchmark score of 1136, while the Intel Core i3-10110U scores 1131. The difference is 5 points, or roughly 0.4%, putting them in the same performance tier.

Q: How many cores and threads does each CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570T has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Intel Core i3-10110U has 2 cores and 4 threads. Despite having half the cores, the i3-10110U still wins Geekbench multi-core by 20.4%.

Q: What is the largest performance delta between the two chips?

A: The largest delta is in Geekbench single-core, where the Intel Core i3-10110U leads by 50.8%, scoring 1174 versus 578. This is a massive gap that highlights the architectural leap between Ivy Bridge and Comet Lake.

Q: Which CPU is better for Cinebench R23 multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570T scores 3293 versus 3236 for the i3-10110U, a 1.8% lead. This is the closest multi-core Cinebench result, but the i5-3570T wins consistently across all Cinebench versions.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. Both the Intel Core i5-3570T and the Intel Core i3-10110U have ECC memory support listed as false. This is a shared limitation that excludes both from error-correcting memory configurations.

Q: What is the production status of each chip?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570T has no production status listed in the data. The Intel Core i3-10110U is explicitly marked as "End-of-life." This suggests the i3-10110U is at the end of its availability cycle, while the i5-3570T’s status is not specified.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial, spanning multiple generations and process nodes. The Intel Core i5-3570T is built on Ivy Bridge, a 22 nm process with 1,400 million transistors on a 160 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-10110U uses Comet Lake, a 14 nm process, though its transistor count and die size are not listed. This process shrink from 22 nm to 14 nm is a key factor in the i3-10110U’s superior power efficiency, as evidenced by its 25 W TDP versus the i5-3570T’s 45 W TDP.

The cache configurations differ significantly. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, but the L3 cache differs: the i5-3570T has 6 MB shared, while the i3-10110U has 4 MB shared. The larger L3 cache on the i5-3570T likely contributes to its Cinebench wins, as it provides more room for working sets in rendering workloads. The i3-10110U compensates with a higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz versus 3.30 GHz, which explains its Geekbench single-core dominance.

The integrated graphics also differ. The i5-3570T features Intel HD 2500, while the i3-10110U features UHD Graphics. The newer UHD Graphics architecture in the i3-10110U is part of the Comet Lake package, but no specific performance numbers are provided in the data. The memory support differs as well: the i5-3570T supports only DDR3, while the i3-10110U supports both DDR3 and DDR4, though memory bus width and bandwidth figures are not listed for either chip.

The PCIe configuration is another point of divergence. The i5-3570T has PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i3-10110U has no PCIe information listed. This reflects the desktop versus mobile design philosophy: the i5-3570T is intended for a platform with a discrete GPU and expansion cards, while the i3-10110U is designed for compact laptops where PCIe lanes are often routed differently or limited.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every headline specification. The i5-3570T has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the i3-10110U has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks are close: 2.30 GHz for the i5-3570T versus 2.10 GHz for the i3-10110U. The boost clock shows a larger gap, with the i3-10110U reaching 4.10 GHz versus 3.30 GHz for the i5-3570T. This 0.80 GHz boost advantage is the most significant clock difference and directly explains the Geekbench single-core results.

Thermal design power is a major differentiator: the i5-3570T is rated at 45 W, while the i3-10110U is rated at 25 W. This nearly 2x difference in TDP makes the i3-10110U far more suitable for thin-and-light laptops, while the i5-3570T is a desktop part with more thermal headroom. The sockets reflect this: the i5-3570T uses Intel Socket 1155, a desktop socket, while the i3-10110U uses Intel BGA 1440, a soldered mobile socket.

Process node and architecture are also distinct: 22 nm Ivy Bridge versus 14 nm Comet Lake. The i5-3570T has a listed transistor count of 1,400 million and a die size of 160 mm², while these figures are absent for the i3-10110U. Memory support differs, with the i5-3570T limited to DDR3 and the i3-10110U supporting both DDR3 and DDR4. The i5-3570T has a PCIe Gen 3 x16 interface, while the i3-10110U has no PCIe data. Integrated graphics are HD 2500 versus UHD Graphics. The release dates are far apart: April 2012 for the i5-3570T and August 2019 for the i3-10110U. The i3-10110U is marked as end-of-life, while the i5-3570T has no production status specified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a fascinating picture of generational trade-offs. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-3570T scores 331 versus 326 for the i3-10110U, a 1.5% win. This is the smallest Cinebench margin, suggesting that the i3-10110U’s 4 threads are nearly a match for the i5-3570T’s 4 cores in this older test. The R20 multi-core result is similar: 1383 for the i5-3570T versus 1359, a 1.8% lead. The R23 multi-core test shows the same 1.8% margin, with scores of 3293 and 3236.

Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern. In R20 single-core, the i5-3570T scores 195 versus 191, a 2.1% win. In R23 single-core, the margin is 2.0%, with scores of 465 and 456. Despite the i3-10110U’s higher 4.10 GHz boost clock, the i5-3570T wins every single-core Cinebench test. This is counterintuitive and suggests that the older Ivy Bridge architecture delivers competitive per-clock performance in this specific benchmark, or that the Cinebench workload does not fully exploit the newer architecture’s strengths.

The Geekbench results tell a completely different story. In Geekbench multi-core, the i3-10110U scores 2143 versus 1705 for the i5-3570T, a 20.4% lead. This is a stunning reversal: the 2-core i3-10110U beats the 4-core i5-3570T by a fifth in a multi-core test. The single-core gap is even larger: 1174 versus 578, a 50.8% lead for the i3-10110U. This margin is double the multi-core lead, indicating that the Comet Lake architecture’s IPC advantage is enormous in Geekbench.

The wins are split 5-2 in favor of the i5-3570T, but the magnitude of the i3-10110U’s wins is much greater. The i5-3570T’s five wins are all within 1.5-2.1%, while the i3-10110U’s two wins are 20.4% and 50.8%. This asymmetry is crucial: the i5-3570T wins narrowly across the board in Cinebench, but the i3-10110U wins decisively in Geekbench. For users who prioritize Geekbench scores, the i3-10110U is clearly superior. For those who prioritize Cinebench, the i5-3570T is marginally better. The average benchmark scores reflect this balance, with 1136 for the i5-3570T and 1131 for the i3-10110U, a difference of just 5 points.